Surface electrical capacitance as an index of epidermal barrier properties of composite skin substitutes and skin autografts

Restoration of the epidermal barrier is a requirement for burn wound closure. A rapid, reliable, and noninvasive measure of the rate of restoration of the epidermal barrier is not readily available. To monitor the reformation of the epidermal barrier, we measured surface electrical capacitance on cultured skin substitutes (human keratinocytes and fibroblasts attached to collagen‐glycosaminoglycan substrates) and split‐thickness skin autografts grafted to patients. Data were collected from four patients with burns and one pediatric patient with a congenital hairy nevus comprising > 60% total body surface area. Capacitance measurements were performed at days 7, 10, 12, 14, and 28 by direct contact of the capacitance probe for 10 seconds to the cultured skin substitutes or split‐thickness autograft. On postoperative days 7, 10, 12, 14, 21, and 28, the surface electrical capacitance of cultured skin substitutes after 10 seconds of sampling was 2468 ± 268, 1443 ± 439, 129 ± 43, 200 ± 44, 88 ± 20, and 74 ± 19 picofarads (mean ± standard error of the mean), respectively. Surface electrical capacitance for split‐thickness autograft on the same days was 1699 ± 371, 1914 ± 433, 125 ± 16, 175 ± 63, 110 ± 26, 271 ± 77 picofarads, respectively. Surface electrical capacitance in all of the grafts decreased with time. Cultured skin substitutes had approximately the same 10‐second capacitance values as split‐thickness autograft during 3 weeks of healing and approached values for uninjured skin (32 ± 5 picofarads) by 12 days. Measurement of surface electrical capacitance is a direct, inexpensive, and convenient index for noninvasive monitoring of epidermal barrier formation.

[1]  Howard I. Maibach,et al.  Bioengineering of the skin : water and the stratum corneum , 2004 .

[2]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Cultured Skin Substitutes and Native Skin Autograft for Treatment of Full‐Thickness Burns , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[3]  S. Hoath,et al.  Effect of Prenatal Steroids on Skin Surface Hydrophobicity in the Premature Rat , 1995, Pediatric Research.

[4]  S. Boyce,et al.  Pigmentation and inhibition of wound contraction by cultured skin substitutes with adult melanocytes after transplantation to athymic mice. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[5]  S. Hoath,et al.  Ontogeny of water sorption-desorption in the perinatal rat. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Skin anatomy and antigen expression after burn wound closure with composite grafts of cultured skin cells and biopolymers. , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide measurements for determination of skin graft "take". , 1992, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[8]  R. Wolf,et al.  The effect of smoking on skin moisture and on surface lipids , 1992, International journal of cosmetic science.

[9]  G. Jemec,et al.  Epidermal hydration and skin mechanics. The relationship between electrical capacitance and the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. , 1990, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[10]  S. Boyce,et al.  Burn wound closure with cultured autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts attached to a collagen-glycosaminoglycan substrate. , 1989, JAMA.

[11]  P. Leung,et al.  Microcirculation in hypertrophic scars after burn injury. , 1989, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[12]  H. Tagami,et al.  Electrical determination of water content and concentration profile in a simulation model of in vivo stratum corneum. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[13]  R. Warner,et al.  Electron probe analysis of human skin: determination of the water concentration profile. , 1988, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[14]  G. Imokawa,et al.  Selective recovery of deranged water-holding properties by stratum corneum lipids. , 1986, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[15]  P. M. Weeks Wound repair, third edition, Peacock Erle E.. WS Saunders Co, Philadelphia (1984), 544 pp, $60.00 , 1984 .

[16]  H. Tagami,et al.  Evaluation of the skin surface hydration in vivo by electrical measurement. , 1980, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[17]  Y. Masuda,et al.  New Methods of Measuring Capacitance and Resistance of Very High Loss Materials at High Frequencies , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[18]  S. Hoath,et al.  Use of continuous electrical capacitance and transepidermal water loss measurements for assessing barrier function in neonatal rat skin. , 1995, Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society.

[19]  S. Hoath,et al.  Human Newborn Skin: The Effect of Isopropanol on Skin Surface Hydrophobicity , 1994, Pediatric Research.

[20]  T. Kajs,et al.  Review of the instrumental assessment of skin: Effects of , 1991 .

[21]  C. Blichmann,et al.  Assessment of skin moisture. Measurement of electrical conductance, capacitance and transepidermal water loss. , 1988, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[22]  K. Yukitake,et al.  Relationship between Maturation of the Skin and Electrical Skin Resistance , 1987, Pediatric Research.

[23]  Jean-Luc Leveque,et al.  Impedance methods for studying skin moisturization , 1983 .

[24]  P. Elias,et al.  Epidermal lipids, barrier function, and desquamation. , 1983, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[25]  A. Kligman,et al.  CHAPTER XX – The Biology of the Stratum Corneum , 1964 .