Why some firms never invest in formal R&D

In this paper we study the frequency of formal R&D investments. We link real options theory to the knowledge‐based view to explain how a firm's knowledge resources influence its frequency of investing in R&D to establish technological options. Specifically, we propose that a firm that lacks internal knowledge resources is more likely to never invest in R&D, a firm that has both internal and external knowledge resources is more likely to sometimes invest in R&D, while a firm that has internal knowledge resources but lacks external knowledge resources is more likely to always invest in R&D. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[2]  Nelson Phillips,et al.  Remembrance of Things Past? The Dynamics of Organizational Forgetting , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment , 1987 .

[4]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Project Management Under Risk: Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R...D , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Rita Gunther McGrath A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments , 1997 .

[6]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[7]  Timothy B. Folta Governance and uncertainty: the trade‐off between administrative control and commitment , 1998 .

[8]  F. Merino,et al.  A consistent analysis of diversification decisions with non-observable firm effects , 1997 .

[9]  Oliver Hart,et al.  Firms, contracts, and financial structure , 1995 .

[10]  C. Annique Un,et al.  Regional Economic Integration and R&D Investment , 2007 .

[11]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study , 2006 .

[12]  Edward H. Bowman,et al.  Real Options Analysis and Strategic Decision Making , 2001 .

[13]  Constance E. Helfat Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: the evolution of firm capabilities , 2000 .

[14]  Tony W. Tong,et al.  Real Options in Strategic Management , 2007 .

[15]  S. Myers Determinants of corporate borrowing , 1977 .

[16]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment , 1997 .

[17]  Erwin Danneels Organizational antecedents of second‐order competences , 2008 .

[18]  David P. Newton,et al.  Real R&D options1: Real R&D options , 2004 .

[19]  Steven White,et al.  Competition, Capabilities, and the Make, Buy, or Ally Decisions of Chinese State-Owned Firms , 2000 .

[20]  R. Salomon,et al.  EXPORT AND DOMESTIC SALES: THEIR INTERRELATIONSHIP AND DETERMINANTS , 2005 .

[21]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[22]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Evolutionary diffusion: internal and external methods used to acquire encompassing, complementary, and incremental technological changes in the lithotripsy industry , 1998 .

[23]  E. Pennings,et al.  The Option Value of Advanced R&D , 1997 .

[24]  B. Kogut,et al.  Capabilities as Real Options , 2001 .

[25]  José David Vicente-Lorente,et al.  Specificity and opacity as resource‐based determinants of capital structure: evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms , 2001 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[27]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms , 2004 .

[28]  Mikel Buesa,et al.  Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region , 1996 .

[29]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[30]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Strategic Management of R&D Pipelines with Cospecialized Investments and Technology Markets , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Helen Weeds,et al.  Strategic Delay in a Real Optimna Model of R&D Competition , 2002 .

[32]  Christopher M. Scherpereel,et al.  The option-creating institution: A real options perspective on economic organization: Working paper series--02-04 , 2002 .

[33]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Real options in multinational corporations: organizational challenges and risk implications , 2007 .

[34]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[35]  E. Hippel,et al.  Customers As Innovators: A New Way to Create Value , 2002 .

[36]  Heli Wang,et al.  Real options and real value: The role of employee incentives to make specific knowledge investments , 2008 .

[37]  Ali H. Hassan,et al.  Application of real options analysis for pharmaceutical R&D project valuation—Empirical results from a survey , 2006 .

[38]  Manfred Perlitz,et al.  Real options valuation: the new frontier in R&D project evaluation? , 1999 .

[39]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Diversification Strategy and R&D Intensity in Multiproduct Firms , 1989 .

[40]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[41]  J. Galende,et al.  Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour , 2003 .

[42]  H. Tsoukas The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[43]  Walter Kuemmerle,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment in Industrial Research in the Pharmaceutical and Electronics Industries: Results from a Survey of Multinational Firms , 1999 .

[44]  Tailan Chi,et al.  Option to acquire or divest a joint venture , 2000 .

[45]  Rita Gunther McGrath Falling Forward: Real Options Reasoning and Entrepreneurial Failure , 1999 .

[46]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  What Is Not A Real Option: Considering Boundaries for the Application of Real Options to Business Strategy , 2004 .

[47]  B. Everitt,et al.  Cluster Analysis: Low Temperatures and Voting in Congress , 2001 .

[48]  R. Pindyck Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment , 1990 .

[49]  E. Lukas,et al.  The Choice between Greenfield Investment and Cross-Border Acquisition: A Real Option Approach , 2006 .

[50]  Joan D. Penner-Hahn,et al.  Firm and environmental influences on the mode and sequence of foreign research and development activities , 1998 .

[51]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[52]  F. Hayek The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[53]  Ming-Cheng Wu,et al.  Pricing Real Growth Options When the Underlying Assets have Jump Diffusion Processes: The Case of R&D Investments , 2007 .

[54]  M. V. Shyam Kumar,et al.  The value from acquiring and divesting a joint venture: a real options approach , 2005 .

[55]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  How Do Real Options Matter? Empirical Research on Strategic Investments and Firm Performance , 2007 .

[56]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[57]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Organizing Practices in Services: Capturing Practice-Based Knowledge for Innovation , 2004 .

[58]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information , 1981 .

[59]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Bridging inter‐ and intra‐firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 2001 .

[60]  R CarlilePaul A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .

[61]  Raffaele Oriani,et al.  Uncertainty and the Market Valuation of R&D within a Real Options Logic , 2008 .

[62]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATION , 1998 .

[63]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[64]  Danny Cassimon,et al.  The valuation of a NDA using a 6-fold compound option , 2004 .

[65]  Timothy B. Folta,et al.  Real options in equity partnerships , 2002 .

[66]  D. Teece ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISE , 1980 .

[67]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  The Derivation of R&D Return Indicators within a Real Options Framework , 2003 .

[68]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[69]  S. Guriev,et al.  Patents vs. Trade Secrets: Knowledge Licensing and Spillover , 2006 .

[70]  D. Gill Strategic Disclosure of Intermediate Research Results , 2008 .

[71]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[72]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF HEURISTICS AND BIASES AFFECTING REAL OPTION VALUATION , 2004 .

[73]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Real Options: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead , 2008 .

[74]  Eduardo S. Schwartz Patents and R&D as Real Options , 2003 .

[75]  C. Un,et al.  Do Subsidiaries of Foreign MNEs Invest More in R&D than Domestic Firms? , 2008 .

[76]  Aija Leiponen,et al.  Skills and innovation , 2005 .

[77]  David Enke,et al.  Valuation for the Strategic Management of Research and Development Projects: The Deferral Option , 2004 .

[78]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses , 1985 .

[79]  Isabel Suárez González,et al.  A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities , 1999 .

[80]  S. Thomke R&D comes to services. Bank of America's pathbreaking experiments. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[81]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or- Buy Decisions in Information Services , 1997 .