Modelling performance of a small array of Wave Energy Converters: Comparison of Spectral and Boussinesq models

This paper presents results from numerical simulations of three Oscillating Wave Surge Converters (OWSC) using two different computational models, Boussinesq wave (BW) and Spectral wave (SW) of the commercial software suite MIKE. The simulation of a shallow water wave farm applies alternative methods for implementing a frequency dependent absorption in both the BW and SW models, where energy extraction is based on experimental data from a scaled Oyster device. The effects of including wave diffraction within the SW model is tested by using diffraction smoothing steps and various directional wave conditions. The results of this study reveal important information on the models realms of validity that is heavily dependent on the incident sea state and the removal of diffraction for the SW model. This yields an increase in simulation accuracy for far-field disturbances when diffraction is entirely removed. This highlights specific conditions where the BW and SW model may thrive but also regions where reduced performance is observed. The results presented in this paper have not been validated with real sea site wave device array performance, however, the methodology described would be useful to device developers to arrive at preliminary decisions on array configurations and to minimise negative environmental impacts.

[1]  P. Troch,et al.  Numerical implementation and sensitivity analysis of a wave energy converter in a time-dependent mild-slope equation model , 2010 .

[2]  Dean L. Millar,et al.  Modelling analysis of the sensitivity of shoreline change to a wave farm , 2007 .

[3]  P. A. Madsen,et al.  A new form of the Boussinesq equations with improved linear dispersion characteristics , 1991 .

[4]  Gregorio Iglesias,et al.  Wave farm impact based on realistic wave-WEC interaction , 2013 .

[5]  Ian Bryden,et al.  On the Interaction of Waves with an Array of Open Chambered Structures: Application to Wave Energy Converters , 2010 .

[6]  Julien De Rouck,et al.  WAKE EFFECTS BEHIND A FARM OF WAVE ENERGY CONVERTERS FOR IRREGULAR LONG-CRESTED AND SHORT-CRESTED WAVES , 2011 .

[7]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Application of the Time-Dependent Mild-Slope Equations for the Simulation of Wake Effects in the Lee of a Farm of Wave Dragon Wave Energy Converters , 2010 .

[8]  George H. Smith,et al.  Wave climate investigation for an array of wave power devices , 2007 .

[9]  J. P. Kofoed,et al.  Numerical modelling of the hydrodynamics around the farm of Wave Activated Bodies ( WAB ) , 2012 .

[10]  Gregorio Iglesias,et al.  Wave farm impact: The role of farm-to-coast distance , 2014 .

[11]  Jørgen Harck Nørgaard,et al.  Investigation of Wave Transmission from a Floating Wave Dragon Wave Energy Converter , 2012 .

[12]  Barbara Zanuttigh,et al.  A FARM OF WAVE ACTIVATED BODIES FOR COASTAL PROTECTION PURPOSES , 2012 .

[13]  Vengatesan Venugopal,et al.  The Simulation of Nearshore Wave Energy Converters and their Associated Impacts around the Outer Hebrides , 2013 .

[14]  A. Sarmento,et al.  The impact of wave energy farms in the shoreline wave climate: Portuguese pilot zone case study using Pelamis energy wave devices , 2010 .

[15]  Per A. Madsen,et al.  Wave reflection from a vertical permeable wave absorber , 1983 .

[16]  Dean L. Millar,et al.  Further analysis of change in nearshore wave climate due to an offshore wave farm: An enhanced case study for the Wave Hub site , 2012 .

[17]  Matthew Folley,et al.  The Effect of the Spectral Distribution of Wave Energy on the Performance of a Bottom Hinged Flap Type Wave Energy Converter , 2012 .

[18]  Zhang Yong-gang A New Form of Boussinesq Equation with Improved Linear Dispersion Characteristics , 1999 .

[19]  P. A. Madsen,et al.  A new form of the Boussinesq equations with improved linear dispersion characteristics. Part 2. A slowly-varying bathymetry , 1992 .