Thenar motor unit number estimates using the multiple point stimulation technique: Reproducibility studies in als patients and normal subjects

Thenar motor unit number estimate (MUNE) reproducibility was assessed in 20 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and 16 normal subjects using the multiple point stimulation (MPS) technique. The MUNE was calculated by dividing the thenar compound muscle action potential negative‐peak (n‐p) area by the mean n‐p area of 10 lowest threshold, all‐or‐nothing, surface‐recorded motor unit action potentials. Two trials (test–retest) were performed by the same examiner either on separate days or on the same day with new electrode placements. The mean test MUNE was 43.4 (SD: 35.9, range: 6–145) for ALS patients and 219.4 (SD: 80.8, range: 122–368) for normal subjects. Test–retest MUNE differences were not significant for ALS patients or normal subjects. The test–retest correlation coefficient (r) was 0.99 for ALS patients and 0.85 for normal subjects. The mean difference between test–retest values was 10% for ALS patients and 17% for normal subjects. Test–retest reproducibility of the thenar MUNE using the MPS technique is high in both ALS patients and normal subjects. The reliability of the MPS technique in estimating motor unit numbers may make it a useful outcome measure in following the course of patients with progressive lower motor neuron disease, especially those enrolled in experimental drug trials.© 1995 John Wiley &Sons, Inc.

[1]  M. Bromberg Motor unit estimation: Reproducibility of the spike‐triggered averaging technique in normal and ALS subjects , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  W. Brown,et al.  Methods for estimating numbers of motor units in biceps‐brachialis muscles and losses of motor units with aging , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  Mb Alan J. McComas Dr.,et al.  Invited review: motor unit estimation: methods, results, and present status. , 1991 .

[4]  M J Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological estimation of the number of motor units within a human muscle , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  W F Brown,et al.  Multiple point electrical stimulation of ulnar and median nerves. , 1976, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  A. McComas,et al.  The numbers and relative sizes of motor units estimated by Computer , 1991, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  C A Laszlo,et al.  A review of techniques employed to estimate the number of motor units in a muscle , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  G. Wieneke,et al.  Estimation of the number of motor units based on macro-EMG. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  D W Stashuk,et al.  Motor unit number estimates based on the automated analysis of F‐responses , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  J F Yang,et al.  Methods for estimating the number of motor units in human muscles , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[11]  T J Doherty,et al.  A method for the longitudinal study of human thenar motor units , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  W. Brown,et al.  The estimated numbers and relative sizes of thenar motor units as selected by multiple point stimulation in young and older adults , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  W. Brown,et al.  AAEM minimonograph #42: Intraoperative monitoring of peripheral and cranial nerves , 1994, Muscle & nerve.