CFD Simulations of the Space Launch System Ascent Aerodynamics and Booster Separation

This paper presents details of Computational Fluid Dynamic modeling of the Space Launch System during ascent. The primary focus of the paper is the flow simulation of the vehicle during ascent using the Overflow Navier-Stokes code. Computations of 739 first-stage flight conditions covering a range of Mach numbers, angles of attack, and roll angles were computed. The overset grid system contained 375 million grid points, and over 28 million CPU hours were used in the simulations. The simulations were run on the Pleiades supercomputer at the NASA Advanced Supercomputer Center at Ames Research Center. The data products from this work include integrated line-loads, surface pressure coefficients, venting pressures, and protuberance air-loads. Detailed comparisons were made of the aerodynamic performance predicted by Overflow and the wind-tunnel derived aerodynamic database. A small number of the cases were run with two different turbulence models and with two differencing schemes. These results were used to quantify the sensitivity to the choice of the turbulence model and to the differencing scheme. The paper also introduces an effort to use the inviscid, unstructured Cartesian solver Cart3D to compute the aerodynamics during booster separation. Adaptive mesh refinement is being used to enable accurate simulations of sixteen booster-separation-motor plumes. The use of this tool is explored in preparation for building a booster-separation aerodynamic database.

[1]  Shishir A. Pandya,et al.  Computation of Sectional Loads from Surface Triangulation and Flow Data , 2011 .

[2]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  A Parallel Multilevel Method for Adaptively Refined Cartesian Grids with Embedded Boundaries , 2000 .

[3]  Karen A. Deere,et al.  Best Practices for Aero-Database CFD Simulations of Ares V Ascent , 2011 .

[4]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  CFD Assessment of Forward Booster Separation Motor Ignition Overpressure on ET XT 718 Ice/Frost Ramp , 2012 .

[5]  William M. Chan,et al.  Developments in Strategies and Software Tools for Overset Structured Grid Generation and Connectivity , 2011 .

[6]  Robert H. Nichols,et al.  Solver and Turbulence Model Upgrades to OVERFLOW 2 for Unsteady and High-Speed Applications , 2006 .

[7]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  STS-107 investigation ascent CFD support , 2004 .

[8]  Bandu N. Pamadi,et al.  Aerodynamic Analyses and Database Development for Ares I Vehicle First Stage Separation , 2011 .

[9]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[10]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Effects of Jet-Interaction on Pitch Control of a Launch Abort Vehicle , 2008 .

[11]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Effects of the Orion Launch Abort Vehicle Plumes on Aerodynamics and Controllability , 2013 .

[12]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Overflow Simulation Guidelines for Orion Launch Abort Vehicle Aerodynamic Analyses (Invited) , 2011 .

[13]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Characterization of Space Shuttle Ascent Debris Aerodynamics Using CFD Methods , 2005 .

[14]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Advances in overset CFD processes applied to subsonic high-lift aircraft , 2000 .

[15]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[16]  F. Menter,et al.  Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model , 2003 .

[17]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Computational Challenges in Simulating Powered Flight of the Orion Launch Abort Vehicle (Invited) , 2011 .

[18]  Jeffrey A. Housman,et al.  Best Practices for CFD Simulations of Launch Vehicle Ascent with Plumes - OVERFLOW Perspective , 2011 .

[19]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Adjoint Error Estimation and Adaptive Refinement for Embedded-Boundary Cartesian Meshes , 2007 .