Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN) assesses the role of bioenergy as a solution to meeting energy demand in a climate-constrained world. Based on inte- grated assessment models, the SRREN states that deployed bioenergy will contribute the greatest proportion of primary energy among renewable energies and result in greenhouse-gas emission reductions. The report also acknowledges insights from life-cycle assessments, which characterize biofuels as a potential source of significant greenhouse-gas emissions and environ - mental harm. The SRREN made considerable progress in bringing together contrasting views on indirect land-use change from inductive bottom-up studies, such as life-cycle analysis, and deductive top-down assessments. However, a reconciliation of these contrasting views is still missing. Tackling this challenge is a fundamental prerequisite for future bioenergy assessment.

[1]  A. Faaij,et al.  A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 , 2007 .

[2]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Towards probabilistic projections of climate change impacts on global crop yields , 2008 .

[3]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere , 2006 .

[4]  J. Edmonds,et al.  2.6: Limiting climate change to 450 ppm CO2 equivalent in the 21st century , 2009 .

[5]  F. Duchin.  Technological Change and International Trade , 1990 .

[6]  J. Fargione,et al.  The Ecological Impact of Biofuels , 2010 .

[7]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Scenarios of global bioenergy production: The trade-offs between agricultural expansion, intensification and trade , 2010 .

[8]  E. DeLucia,et al.  The greenhouse gas value of ecosystems , 2011 .

[9]  Cutler J. Cleveland,et al.  Encyclopedia of Energy , 2004 .

[10]  H. Lotze-Campen,et al.  Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production , 2010 .

[11]  Thomas W. Hertel,et al.  Economic Analysis of Land Use in Global Climate Change Policy , 2009 .

[12]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  The economics of decarbonizing the energy system—results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison , 2012, Climatic Change.

[13]  Pete Smith,et al.  Energy crops: current status and future prospects , 2006 .

[14]  J. DeCicco.  Addressing Biofuel GHG Emissions in the Context of a Fossil-Based Carbon Cap , 2009 .

[15]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints , 2009 .

[16]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing , 2009 .

[17]  J. Habermas.  Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”? , 1968 .

[18]  D. Lobell,et al.  Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture , 2010, Environmental Research Letters.

[19]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Implications of Limiting CO2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy , 2009, Science.

[20]  R. Socolow.  High-consequence outcomes and internal disagreements: tell us more, please , 2011 .

[21]  R. Plevin.  Life Cycle Regulation of Transportation Fuels: Uncertainty and its Policy Implications , 2010 .

[22]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Indirect land use change for biofuels: Testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies , 2011 .

[23]  T. Richard.  Challenges in Scaling Up Biofuels Infrastructure , 2010, Science.

[24]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  The Collapse of the Fact-value Dichotomy , 2002 .

[25]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Potential Land Use Implications of a Global Biofuels Industry , 2007 .

[26]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks , 2011 .

[27]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs , 2010 .

[28]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  How to ensure greenhouse gas emission reductions by increasing the use of biofuels?: Suitability of the European Union sustainability criteria , 2011 .

[29]  A. Faaij,et al.  Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios , 2005 .

[30]  D. Lobell,et al.  Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials , 2011 .

[31]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  T. Beringer,et al.  The global technical potential of bio-energy in 2050 considering sustainability constraints , 2010, Current opinion in environmental sustainability.

[33]  David Zilberman,et al.  Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies , 2011 .

[34]  Betina Dimaranan,et al.  Global trade and environmental impact study of the EU biofuels mandate. , 2010 .

[35]  Michael Taylor,et al.  An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[36]  Carl Wood,et al.  Current Status and Future Prospects , 1984 .

[37]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Breeding and Cereal Yield Progress , 2010 .

[38]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[39]  Navin Ramankutty,et al.  Mind the gap: how do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? , 2010 .

[40]  Tracey Holloway,et al.  Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology , 2008 .

[41]  Leon E. Clarke,et al.  Role of renewable energy in climate mitigation: a synthesis of recent scenarios , 2011 .

[42]  André Faaij,et al.  Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems , 2010 .

[43]  Kristin Seyboth,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Reviewers of the IPCC Special Report , 2011 .

[44]  K. Cassman.  Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  J. Powles,et al.  Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health , 2007, The Lancet.

[46]  J. Melillo,et al.  Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? , 2009, Science.

[47]  C. Field,et al.  Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization , 2007 .

[49]  L. Ridolfi,et al.  Reduction of the hyporheic zone volume due to the stream‐aquifer interaction , 2008 .

[50]  Thomas Bruckner,et al.  Mitigation potential and costs , 2011 .

[51]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[52]  Michael O'Hare,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[53]  A. Faaij,et al.  From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning , 2010 .

[54]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Probabilistic forecast for twenty-first-century climate based on uncertainties in emissions (without policy) and climate parameters. , 2009 .

[55]  T. Beringer,et al.  Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints , 2011 .

[56]  K Ann McKibbon,et al.  Current status and future prospects. , 2008, Health information and libraries journal.

[57]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[58]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[59]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Technological Change and International Trade -Insights from REMIND-R , 2010 .

[60]  Dieter Gerten,et al.  The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system , 2011 .

[61]  Mareike Lange,et al.  The GHG Balance of Biofuels Taking into Account Land Use Change (Power Point) , 2011 .

[62]  R. Service.  Is there a road ahead for cellulosic ethanol? , 2010, Science.

[63]  Wyatt Thompson,et al.  Effects of US biofuel policies on US and world petroleum product markets with consequences for greenhouse gas emissions , 2011 .

[64]  A. Horvath,et al.  Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[65]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Bioenergy , 2011 .

[66]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs , 2007 .

[67]  R. Howarth,et al.  Psychohistory revisited: fundamental issues in forecasting climate futures , 2011 .

[68]  Christopher B Field,et al.  The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[69]  T. Beringer,et al.  On sustainability of bioenergy production: integrating co-emissions from agricultural intensification. , 2011 .

[70]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-Mediated Responses , 2010 .

[71]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Climate policies for road transport revisited (I): Evaluation of the current framework , 2011 .

[72]  A. Faaij,et al.  Bioenergy revisited: Key factors in global potentials of bioenergy , 2010 .

[73]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The IPCC AR5 guidance note on consistent treatment of uncertainties: a common approach across the working groups , 2011 .

[74]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[75]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Climate benefits of changing diet , 2009 .

[76]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[77]  H. Putnam.  The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays , 2002 .

[78]  J. Bruinsma.  World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030: An Fao Perspective , 2002 .

[79]  R. Howarth,et al.  Limitations of integrated assessment models of climate change , 2009 .

[80]  T. Searchinger,et al.  Land-Use Change Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases , 2008 .

[81]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Exploring IMAGE model scenarios that keep greenhouse gas radiative forcing below 3 W/m2 in 2100 , 2010 .

[82]  R. DeFries,et al.  Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[83]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Renewable Energy in the Context of Sustainable Development , 2011 .