Websites for E-Electioneering in Maharashtra and Gujarat, India

Purpose – The purpose of this exploratory study is to look at how the Internet was used by political parties and candidates during the Indian parliamentary elections of 2009.Design/methodology/approach – A total of 31 web sites belonging to political parties and their candidates in the Indian states of Maharashtra and Gujarat were examined for how they were used to mobilize volunteers and voters. An online questionnaire and in‐depth interviews were administered to the web site coordinators/designers and politicians.Findings – The study found that sites were not used to their maximum potential but instead, merely for publicity, online presence, and to explore the new medium. There was greater reliance by most candidates on traditional media such as rallies and face‐to‐face interaction. The reason may be due to the limited Internet penetration in India, which also means the Internet may have less influence on voters. Some candidates have shown the way to the potential use of the medium for fund raising and ...

[1]  Daniel J. Weitzner,et al.  Developing the national communications and information infrastructure , 2010, Internet Res..

[3]  Michael Margolis.  Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[4]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Tentative steps towards interaction: The use of the Internet in the British European Parliament Election 2009 , 2010, Internet Res..

[5]  CHRISTOPHER LATIMER,et al.  Understanding the complexity of the digital divide in relation to the quality of House campaign websites in the United States , 2009, New Media Soc..

[6]  Nigel Jackson,et al.  Political parties, the Internet and the 2005 General Election: third time lucky? , 2007, Internet Res..

[7]  Cristian Vaccari,et al.  From the air to the ground: the internet in the 2004 US presidential campaign , 2008, New Media Soc..

[8]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  Online campaigning: an opening for the outsiders? An analysis of Finnish parliamentary candidates' websites in the 2003 election campaign , 2009, New Media Soc..

[9]  K. Foot,et al.  The Internet and national elections : a comparative study of web campaigning , 2007 .

[10]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification , 2007 .

[11]  Jim Macnamara,et al.  E-Electioneering: Use of new media in the 2007 Australian federal election , 2008 .

[12]  Cristian Vaccari.  Research Note: Italian Parties' Websites in the 2006 Elections , 2008 .

[13]  B. Steel,et al.  Public Information Campaigns and "At-Risk" Voters , 1998 .

[14]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[15]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Parties, Election Campaigning and the Internet:Toward A Comparative Institutional Approach , 2008 .

[16]  M. R. Kerbel,et al.  Blog for America and Civic Involvement , 2005 .

[17]  Rohit Chopra.  Global primordialities: virtual identity politics in online Hindutva and online Dalit discourse , 2006, New Media Soc..

[18]  Rob Malouf,et al.  Taking sides: user classification for informal online political discourse , 2008, Internet Res..

[19]  David Jacobs,et al.  Internet Activism and the Democratic Emergency in the U.S. , 2005 .

[20]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer.  Election Campaigning Online , 2005 .

[21]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[22]  Aaron Smith and Lee Rainie.  The internet and the 2008 election , 2008 .