Post-licence driver education for the prevention of road traffic crashes.

BACKGROUND Worldwide, each year over a million people are killed and some ten million people are permanently disabled in road traffic crashes. Post-licence driver education is used by many as a strategy to reduce traffic crashes. However, the effectiveness of post-licence driver education has yet to be ascertained. OBJECTIVES To quantify the effectiveness of post-licence driver education in reducing road traffic crashes. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, TRANSPORT (NTIS, TRIS, TRANSDOC, IRRD), Road Res (ARRB), ATRI, National Research Register, PsycInfo, ERIC, SPECTR, Zetoc, SIGLE, Science (and Social Science) Citation Index. We searched the Internet, checked reference lists of relevant papers and contacted appropriate organisations. The search was not restricted by language or publication status. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing post-licence driver education versus no education, or one form of post-licence driver education versus another. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed methodological trial quality. MAIN RESULTS We found 24 trials of driver education, 23 conducted in the USA and one in Sweden. Twenty trials studied remedial driver education. The methodological quality of the trials was poor and three reported data unsuitable for meta-analysis. Nineteen trials reported traffic offences: pooled relative risk (RR) = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.94, 0.98); trial heterogeneity was significant (p=<0.00001). Fifteen trials reported traffic crashes: pooled RR = 0.98 (95% CI 0.96, 1.01), trial heterogeneity was not significant (p=0.75). Four trials reported injury crashes: pooled RR = 1.12 (95% CI 0.88, 1.41), trial heterogeneity was significant (p=<0.00001). No one form of education (correspondence, group or individual) was found to be substantially more effective than another, nor was a significant difference found between advanced driver education and remedial driver education. Funnel plots indicated the presence of publication bias affecting the traffic offence and crash outcomes. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS This systematic review provides no evidence that post-licence driver education is effective in preventing road traffic injuries or crashes. Although the results are compatible with a small reduction in the occurrence of traffic offences, this may be due to selection biases or bias in the included trials. Because of the large number of participants included in the meta-analysis (close to 300,000 for some outcomes) we can exclude, with reasonable precision, the possibility of even modest benefits.

[1]  Michel Bédard,et al.  Evaluation of a Re-training Program for Older Drivers , 2004, Canadian Journal of Public Health.

[2]  Beth T. Stalvey,et al.  Impact of an educational program on the safety of high-risk, visually impaired, older drivers. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  Kamran Abbasi,et al.  War on the roads , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  T. Triggs,et al.  Training for Attentional Control in Novice Car Drivers: A Simulator Study , 1998 .

[5]  Jesse A Berlin,et al.  Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? , 1997, The Lancet.

[6]  Barnie Jones,et al.  Age differences in response to high and low-threat driver improvement warning letters , 1997 .

[7]  B Jones,et al.  Age, gender and the effectiveness of high-threat letters: an analysis of Oregon's driver improvement advisory letters. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  N P Gregersen,et al.  Young drivers' overestimation of their own skill--an experiment on the relation between training strategy and skill. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  R E Kayser,et al.  Evaluation of a Dutch Educational “Driving While Intoxicated (DWI)” Prevention Program for Driving Schools , 1995, Journal of drug education.

[10]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[11]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1994 .

[12]  J. H. Schuenemeyer,et al.  Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.) , 1992 .

[13]  Paul Litwin,et al.  Driver training , 1989 .

[14]  Daniel Kadell,et al.  Traffic safety impacts of the Home Instruction/ Point Reduction Incentive (HI/PRI) program , 1987 .

[15]  Barnie Jones,et al.  Oregon's habitual traffic offender program: An evaluation of the effectiveness of license revocation , 1987 .

[16]  W C Marsh,et al.  NEGLIGENT-OPERATOR TREATMENT EVALUATION SYSTEM: PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS REPORT NUMBER 1 , 1985 .

[17]  P M Salzberg,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF THE GOAL SETTING PROGRAM: AN INTERVENTION FOR HIGH RISK DRIVERS , 1985 .

[18]  Clifford J. Helander,et al.  INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR ACCIDENT-INVOLVED DRIVERS: AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF CURRENT CALIFORNIA POLICY AND ALTERNATIVES , 1984 .

[19]  C Lynn,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE VIRGINIA DRIVER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ON NEGLIGENT DRIVING : 24-MONTH REPORT : FINAL REPORT , 1982 .

[20]  Cheryl Lynn,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE VIRGINIA DRIVER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ON NEGLIGENT DRIVING: 12 MONTH REPORT , 1982 .

[21]  R C Peck,et al.  NEGLIGENT OPERATOR PROGRAM COSTS AND EFFECTIVENESS. POST LICENSING CONTROL REPORTING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM , 1981 .

[22]  Jon C. Prothero,et al.  Evaluation of an Experimental Treatment for Problem Drivers , 1978 .

[23]  W C Marsh,et al.  EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES TO DRIVER IMPROVEMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION WITH NEGLIGENT DRIVERS , 1978 .

[24]  R G Ulmer,et al.  NEW HAMPSHIRE ALCOHOL SAFETY ACTION PROJECT. ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DRIVER RETRAINING SCHOOLS , 1977 .

[25]  D Kadell,et al.  POST LICENSING CONTROL REPORTING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM: NEGLIGENT OPERATOR PROGRAM COSTS AND EFFECTIVENESS , 1977 .

[26]  L K Li,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA HABITUAL OFFENDER LAW , 1976 .

[27]  R. M. Harano,et al.  An evaluation of some additional factors influencing the effectiveness of warning letters , 1975 .

[28]  P A O'Neall,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF TWO GROUP INTERVIEW AND TWO LETTER-CONTACT DRIVER IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS , 1975 .

[29]  N Kaestner,et al.  SUCCESSFUL ALTERNATIVES TO LICENSE SUSPENSION: THE DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE AND THE PROBATIONARY LICENSE , 1975 .

[30]  D. Pelz,et al.  Reduction of young driver crashes in a controlled pilot study: two-year follow-up in one Michigan high school. , 1971, JAMA.

[31]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A UNIFORM TRAFFIC SCHOOL CURRICULUM FOR NEGLIGENT DRIVERS WITH DISCUSSION , 1971 .

[32]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  MODIFYING NEGLIGENT DRIVING BEHAVIOR THROUGH WARNING LETTERS , 1970 .

[33]  W B Carcary,et al.  THE NEW DRIVER PROJECT - CHANGING DRIVER BELIEFS, ATTITUDES AND SELF-REPORTED DRIVING BEHAVIOUR AMONGST YOUNG DRIVERS THROUGH CLASSROOM-BASED PRE AND POST DRIVING TEST INTERVENTIONS , 2001 .

[34]  Broderick E. Reischl,et al.  Recorded Traffic Offenses of Graduates of Traffic Safety School, Cook County, Illinois , 1999 .

[35]  A J McKnight,et al.  Accident prevention versus recidivism prevention courses for repeat traffic offenders. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  Steven K. Jahns,et al.  Anti-lock brake system: an assessment of training on driver effectiveness. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global health statistics: a compendium of incidence prevalence and mortality estimates for over 200 conditions. , 1996 .

[38]  Patrick T McCoy,et al.  EVALUATION OF COUNTERMEASURES FOR IMPROVING DRIVING PERFORMANCE OF OLDER DRIVERS , 1993 .

[39]  M Ratz,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF A TRAFFIC SAFETY FILM OR A DRIVE TEST WITH COUNSELING SESSION FOR RENEWAL DRIVERS LICENSE APPLICANTS WITH POOR PRIOR RECORDS , 1989 .

[40]  Daniel Kadell,et al.  The traffic safety impact of driver improvement countermeasures targeting 55-MPH speed limit compliance , 1984 .

[41]  R C Peck,et al.  CALIFORNIA'S POST-LICENSING CONTROL REPORTING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM--A SUMMARY OF THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF RESULTS , 1983 .

[42]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ACCREDITED TRAFFIC VIOLATOR SCHOOLS IN REDUCING ACCIDENTS AND VIOLATIONS , 1980 .

[43]  C Fuchs,et al.  Wisconsin Driver Improvement Program: A treatment-control evaluation , 1980 .

[44]  C B Stoke,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF WRITTEN TESTS OF DRIVERS' KNOWLEDGE OF RULES OF THE ROAD , 1980 .

[45]  S A Schupack,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL'S DEFENSIVE DRIVING COURSE AS AN ADJUNCT TO HIGH SCHOOL DRIVER EDUCATION PROGRAMS, PART II , 1975 .

[46]  R. M. Harano,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF CALIFORNIA'S "GOOD DRIVER" INCENTIVE PROGRAM , 1974 .

[47]  N Kaestner,et al.  Accident and violation reduction through brief driver improvement interviews , 1967 .

[48]  R C Peck,et al.  A re-evaluation of group driver improvement meetings , 1965 .

[49]  R S Coppin,et al.  A CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF GROUP DRIVER IMPROVEMENT MEETINGS. , 1961 .