Measuring Disability in Medicare Home Care Patients: Application of Rasch Modeling to the Outcome and Assessment Information Set

Background. The Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) is the universal clinical assessment tool for adult nonmaternity patients receiving skilled care at home from Medicare-certified home health agencies in the United States. Anticipating increased use of OASIS data for research purposes, this article explored the usefulness of Rasch modeling to address disability measurement challenges presented by the unique response category structure of the seven activities of daily living (ADL) and eight instrumental ADL (IADL) items in the OASIS. Objectives. To illustrate how Rasch model statistics can be used to evaluate OASIS ADL and IADL item unidimensionality and model fit; to illustrate how Rasch modeling simultaneously estimates ADL and IADL item difficulty, thresholds between item response categories, and person disability; and to compare Rasch estimates of item difficulty and person disability scores to estimates based on more conventional Likert scoring techniques. Subjects. Medicare-eligible home health care patients (n = 583) served by one of 12 home care agencies in Ohio between November 1999 and September 2000. Measures. ADL and IADL items were measured three ways: according to the original OASIS scoring (raw Likert); transformed raw Likert scores accounting for the nonuniform item structure (corrected Likert); and Rasch Partial Credit model scores. Results. The items bathing and telephone use showed evidence of unexpected response patterns; recoding of these items was necessary for good Rasch model fit. Partial Credit model results revealed that interval distances between response categories varied widely across the 15 ADL and IADL items. When ADL and IADL items were ranked by level of difficulty, results were similar between Rasch and corrected Likert measurement approaches; however, corrected Likert person scores were found to be nonlinear at highest and lowest disability levels when plotted against Rasch person scores. Conclusions. Rasch modeling can help improve the precision of disability measurement in Medicare home care patients when using ADL and IADL items from the OASIS instrument.

[1]  D. Cella,et al.  Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: A Discussion of Item Response Theory and Its Applications in Health Status Assessment , 2000, Medical care.

[2]  J. Linacre Detecting multidimensionality: which residual data-type works best? , 1998, Journal of outcome measurement.

[3]  P. Kemper The use of formal and informal home care by the disabled elderly. , 1992, Health services research.

[4]  C. Granger,et al.  The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  RON D. HAYS,et al.  Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21st Century , 2000, Medical care.

[6]  A. Kramer,et al.  Measuring and Assuring the Quality of Home Health Care , 1994, Health care financing review.

[7]  L. Branch,et al.  A Preliminary Case-Mix Classification System for Medicare Home Health Clients , 1993, Medical care.

[8]  R. L. Kane,et al.  Developing a New Metric for ADLs , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  W. Spector,et al.  Combining activities of daily living with instrumental activities of daily living to measure functional disability. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[10]  D. Rabin,et al.  Posthospitalization home health care use and changes in functional status in a Medicare population. , 2000, Medical care.

[11]  R. M. Smith,et al.  Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. , 1998, Journal of outcome measurement.

[12]  N. Cook,et al.  A prospective study of incident comprehensive medical home care use among the elderly. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[13]  B. Wright,et al.  The structure of an instrument for assessing the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1996, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[14]  Anastasia E. Raczek,et al.  Comparison of Rasch and summated rating scales constructed from SF-36 physical functioning items in seven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  D. Patrick,et al.  Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness Evaluations: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges , 2000, Medical care.

[16]  S. Inouye,et al.  Predictors of Formal Home Health Care Use in Elderly Patients after Hospitalization , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  R. Luce,et al.  Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .

[18]  R. M. Smith,et al.  Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models. , 2000, Journal of applied measurement.

[19]  B. Soldo In-Home Services for the Dependent Elderly , 1985, Research on aging.

[20]  C. McHorney,et al.  Equating Health Status Measures With Item Response Theory: Illustrations With Functional Status Items , 2000, Medical care.

[21]  A. Jette,et al.  Toward understanding elders' health service utilization , 2005, Journal of Community Health.

[22]  B. Wright,et al.  Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  D. Andrich A rating formulation for ordered response categories , 1978 .

[24]  Mark D. Reckase,et al.  Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques , 1998 .

[25]  P. Diehr,et al.  Factors explaining the use of health care services by the elderly. , 1984, Health services research.

[26]  G. Arling,et al.  Use of in-home care by very old people. , 1984, Journal of health and social behavior.

[27]  K. Liu,et al.  Home care for the disabled elderly: predictors and expected costs. , 1992, Health services research.

[28]  Measuring disability: application of the Rasch model to activities of daily living (ADL/IADL). , 2001, Journal of outcome measurement.

[29]  R. Fortinsky,et al.  Home care resource consumption and patient outcomes: what are the relationships? , 1997, Home health care services quarterly.

[30]  M. R. Espejo Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences , 2004 .

[31]  C. Granger,et al.  The Use of Functional Assessment in Understanding Home Care Needs , 1981, Medical care.

[32]  R. A. Starrett,et al.  Home health care utilization: a causal model. , 1989, Home health care services quarterly.