Fuzzy risk analysis under influence of non-homogeneous preferences elicitation in fiber industry

Fuzzy risk analysis plays an important role in mitigating the levels of harm of a risk. In real world scenarios, it is a big challenge for risk analysts to make a proper and comprehensive decision when coping with risks that are incomplete, vague and fuzzy. Many established fuzzy risk analysis approaches do not have the flexibility to deal with knowledge in the form of preferences elicitation which lead to incorrect risk decision. The inefficiency is reflected when they consider only risk analyst preferences elicitation that is partially known. Nonetheless, the preferences elicited by the risk analyst are often non-homogeneous in nature such that they can be completely known, completely unknown, partially known and partially unknown. In this case, established fuzzy risk analysis methods are considered as inefficient in handling risk, hence an appropriate fuzzy risk analysis method that can deal with the non-homogeneous nature of risk analyst’s preferences elicitation is worth developing. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel fuzzy risk analysis method that is capable to deal with the non-homogeneous risk analyst’s preferences elicitation based on grey numbers. The proposed method aims at resolving the uncertain interactions between homogeneous and non-homogeneous natures of risk analyst’s preferences elicitation by using a novel consensus reaching approach that involves transformation of grey numbers into grey parametric fuzzy numbers. Later on, a novel fuzzy risk assessment score approach is presented to correctly evaluate and distinguish the levels of harm of the risks faced, such that these evaluations are consistent with preferences elicitation of the risk analyst. A real world risk analysis problem in fiber industry is then carried out to demonstrate the novelty, validity and feasibility of the proposed method.

[1]  Enrique Romero,et al.  Tensile strength during drying of remoulded and compacted clay: The role of fabric and water retention , 2018, Applied Clay Science.

[2]  Alexander E. Gegov,et al.  Ranking of fuzzy numbers based on centroid point and spread , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[3]  Abdul Malek Yaakob,et al.  FN-TOPSIS: Fuzzy Networks for Ranking Traded Equities , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[4]  Hadi Akbarzade Khorshidi,et al.  An improved similarity measure for generalized fuzzy numbers and its application to fuzzy risk analysis , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[5]  Harish Garg,et al.  Symmetric Triangular Interval Type-2 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets with Their Applications in Multi Criteria Decision Making , 2018, Symmetry.

[6]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  On the relationship between some extensions of fuzzy set theory , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Dipak Kumar Jana,et al.  Novel interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller for improving risk assessment model of cyber security , 2018, J. Inf. Secur. Appl..

[8]  Fang Yan,et al.  A set pair analysis based layer of protection analysis and its application in quantitative risk assessment , 2018, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[9]  Yong-Huang Lin,et al.  Novel high-precision grey forecasting model , 2007 .

[10]  Vahab Sarfarazi,et al.  Determination of tensile strength of concrete using a novel apparatus , 2018 .

[11]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  R-fuzzy sets and grey system theory , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[12]  Alexander E. Gegov,et al.  Multi-Layer Decision Methodology For Ranking Z-Numbers , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[13]  Harish Garg,et al.  An approach for analyzing the reliability and profit of an industrial system based on the cost free warranty policy , 2018 .

[14]  Harish Garg,et al.  Some Generalized Complex Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multicriteria Decision-Making Process , 2018, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering.

[15]  Li-Wei Chen,et al.  Integration of the grey relational analysis with genetic algorithm for software effort estimation , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Harish Garg,et al.  A novel approach for analyzing the reliability of series-parallel system using credibility theory and different types of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers , 2016 .

[17]  Deng Ju-Long,et al.  Control problems of grey systems , 1982 .

[18]  Harish Garg,et al.  Some arithmetic operations on the generalized sigmoidal fuzzy numbers and its application , 2018 .

[19]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  Type-2 Fuzzy Logic and the Modelling of Uncertainty in Applications , 2009, Human-Centric Information Processing Through Granular Modelling.

[20]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (II) , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  Andrzej Bargiela,et al.  Human-Centric Information Processing Through Granular Modelling , 2009, Human-Centric Information Processing Through Granular Modelling.

[22]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  A significance measure for R-fuzzy sets , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[23]  David V. Budescu,et al.  A review of human linguistic probability processing: General principles and empirical evidence , 1995, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[24]  G. Kannan,et al.  A hybrid normalised multi criteria decision making for the vendor selection in a supply chain model , 2007 .

[25]  Yi Lin,et al.  Grey Information - Theory and Practical Applications , 2005, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[26]  Etienne Parizet,et al.  Empirical identification of perceptual criteria for customer-centred design. Focus on the sound of tapping on the dashboard when exploring a car , 2010 .

[27]  Türkay Dereli,et al.  Industrial applications of type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: A concise review , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[28]  Shyamal Kumar Mondal,et al.  Fuzzy risk analysis in familial breast cancer using a similarity measure of interval-valued fuzzy numbers , 2016 .

[29]  Harish Garg,et al.  A NOVEL TRIANGULAR INTERVAL TYPE-2 INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS AND THEIR AGGREGATION OPERATORS , 2018 .

[30]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model by Applying Grey Numbers , 2009, Informatica.

[31]  J. Deng,et al.  Introduction to Grey system theory , 1989 .

[32]  Yong-Huang Lin,et al.  Multi-attribute group decision making model under the condition of uncertain information , 2008 .

[33]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities (II) , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Martí Rosas-Casals,et al.  Applying network analysis to assess coastal risk planning , 2018 .

[35]  Rituparna Chutia,et al.  A new method of ranking parametric form of fuzzy numbers using value and ambiguity , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[36]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  Grey sets and greyness , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[37]  Abraham Kandel,et al.  A new fuzzy arithmetic , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[38]  Gagandeep Kaur,et al.  Generalized Cubic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators Using t-Norm Operations and Their Applications to Group Decision-Making Process , 2018, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering.

[39]  Hao Wu,et al.  Risk assessment of rockburst via an extended MABAC method under fuzzy environment , 2019, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology.

[40]  Sara Mantovani,et al.  Influence of Manufacturing Constraints on the Topology Optimization of an Automotive Dashboard , 2017 .

[41]  Bao Qing Hu,et al.  Dominance-based rough fuzzy set approach and its application to rule induction , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Yi Lin,et al.  Theory of grey systems: capturing uncertainties of grey information , 2004 .