Mediatization of Social Space and the Case of Uber Drivers

Digital data have become a form of “objectivation”, which affect how we construct social knowledge and organize social space (Couldry & Hepp, 2017). The workplace is one sphere that is increasingly datafied. This study explores how Uber drivers, a form of digitally-enabled service workers, contribute to the normalization of the social production of space through their interpretative practices of digital data in an online forum. Drawing on Uber’s corporate discourse and an Uber driver online forum, we analyze two facets of the Uber app and drivers’ mediated experiences: (1) the quantification and discipline of drivers’ performance through Uber’s rating system and (2) the coordination of spatial movement through location-related metrics. We argue that the underlying workings of the Uber app premediate expectations of service encounters and spatial movement. Uber drivers meanwhile develop practices which respond to and circumvent their own data contributions to the system. Drivers’ practices, we argue, are largely in compliance with the calculative logics set by Uber. The article addresses implications of Uber drivers’ practices for the reproduction of social space and power-relations in digitally-enabled service work and the gig economy.

[1]  Aaron Shapiro,et al.  Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy , 2018, New Media Soc..

[2]  I. Coyne.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  Solon Barocas,et al.  Discriminating Tastes: Uber's Customer Ratings as Vehicles for Workplace Discrimination , 2017 .

[4]  N. Couldry,et al.  The Mediated Construction of Reality , 2016 .

[5]  Steven H. Lopez.  Workers, Managers, and Customers , 2010 .

[6]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Standing Out from the Crowd: Emotional Labor, Body Labor, and Temporal Labor in Ridesharing , 2016, CSCW.

[7]  A. Hochschild,et al.  The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. , 1985 .

[8]  K. Ball.  Workplace surveillance: an overview , 2010 .

[9]  Melissa Gregg,et al.  On Friday Night Drinks: Workplace Affects in the Age of the Cubicle , 2009 .

[10]  Jocelyn A. Hollander,et al.  Conceptualizing Resistance , 2004 .

[11]  U. Huws.  Labor in the Global Digital Economy: The Cybertariat Comes of Age , 2014 .

[12]  Trebor Scholz.  Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital Economy , 2016 .

[13]  William Attwood-Charles,et al.  The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms , 2017 .

[14]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Designing for Labour: Uber and the On-Demand Mobile Workforce , 2016, CHI.

[15]  N. van Doorn,et al.  Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy , 2017 .

[16]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .

[17]  Angèle Christin.  Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice , 2017 .

[18]  Claire Maiers,et al.  Analytics in action: users and predictive data in the neonatal intensive care unit , 2017 .

[19]  F. Davis,et al.  The Cabdriver and His Fare: Facets of a Fleeting Relationship , 1959, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Alex Rosenblat,et al.  Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers , 2016 .

[21]  The taxicab-hailing encounter: The politics of gesture in the interaction order , 2014 .

[22]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Thinking critically about and researching algorithms , 2014, The Social Power of Algorithms.

[23]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (an excerpt) , 1991, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[24]  H. Braverman.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[25]  Alison Hearn,et al.  Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and rating, and the digital 'reputation' economy , 2010 .

[26]  Peter Fleming,et al.  The Human Capital Hoax: Work, Debt and Insecurity in the Era of Uberization , 2017 .

[27]  Bernhard Rieder,et al.  Scrutinizing an algorithmic technique: the Bayes classifier as interested reading of reality , 2017, The Social Power of Algorithms.

[28]  André Jansson.  Mediatization and Social Space: Reconstructing Mediatization for the Transmedia Age , 2013 .

[29]  David Stark,et al.  The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life , 2009 .

[30]  Karen E. C. Levy,et al.  The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work , 2015, Inf. Soc..

[31]  V. Gekara.  Humans and machines at work; Monitoring, surveillance and automation in contemporary capitalismP.Moore, M.Upchurch, and X.Whittaker (2018), Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 253 pages. Price, £89.99 , 2019, New Technology, Work and Employment.

[32]  C. Anderson.  Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms , 2011 .

[33]  Matt Carlson,et al.  Automating judgment? Algorithmic judgment, news knowledge, and journalistic professionalism , 2018, New Media Soc..

[34]  S. Bolton.  Old ambiguities and new developments : exploring the emotional labour process , 2010 .

[35]  R. Leidner.  Emotional Labor in Service Work , 1999 .

[36]  Solon Barocas,et al.  Refractive Surveillance: Monitoring Customers to Manage Workers , 2018 .

[37]  M. Marshall.  Sampling for qualitative research. , 1996, Family practice.

[38]  Lee Humphreys,et al.  Connecting, Coordinating, Cataloguing: Communicative Practices on Mobile Social Networks , 2012 .

[39]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers , 2015, CHI.

[40]  A. Young.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[41]  Rosie Smith.  Cyber-proletariat: global labour in the digital vortex , 2016 .

[42]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[43]  Brenton J. Malin,et al.  Free to Work Anxiously: Splintering Precarity Among Drivers for Uber and Lyft , 2017 .

[44]  Julie Yujie Chen,et al.  Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy , 2018, New Media Soc..

[45]  Taina Bucher,et al.  The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms , 2017, The Social Power of Algorithms.

[46]  Brooke Erin Duffy,et al.  The romance of work: Gender and aspirational labour in the digital culture industries , 2016 .

[47]  Wendy Nelson Espeland,et al.  The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change , 2009 .