Greenfield Investments, Economic Complexity, and Financial Inclusion-Environmental Quality Nexus in BRICS Countries: Does Renewable Energy Transition matter?

[1]  Rizwan Raheem Ahmed,et al.  Can intra-regional trade, renewable energy use, foreign direct investments, and economic growth mitigate ecological footprints in South Asia? , 2022 .

[2]  Bangzhu Zhu,et al.  The impact of economic complexity, technology advancements, and nuclear energy consumption on the ecological footprint of the USA: Towards circular economy initiatives , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[3]  Tasnim Sultana,et al.  Impact of urbanization, industrialization, electrification and renewable energy on the environment in BRICS: fresh evidence from novel CS-ARDL model , 2022, Heliyon.

[4]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Going away or going green in NAFTA nations? Linking natural resources, energy utilization, and environmental sustainability through the lens of the EKC hypothesis , 2022, Resources Policy.

[5]  A. Zakari,et al.  Roles of trilemma in the world energy sector and transition towards sustainable energy: A study of economic growth and the environment , 2022, Energy Policy.

[6]  Muhammad Usman,et al.  Investigating the Role of Information and Communication Technologies, Economic Growth, and Foreign Direct Investment in the Mitigation of Ecological Damages for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals , 2022, Evaluation review.

[7]  O. Aluko,et al.  Economic complexity and environmental degradation: Evidence from OECD countries , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[8]  M. Usman,et al.  Are Mercosur economies going green or going away? An empirical investigation of the association between technological innovations, energy use, natural resources and GHG emissions , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[9]  A. Awan,et al.  How far renewable energy and globalization are useful to mitigate the environment in Mexico? Application of QARDL and spectral causality analysis , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[10]  Irfan Khan,et al.  Modeling factors of biogas technology adoption: a roadmap towards environmental sustainability and green revolution , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[11]  Atif Jahanger,et al.  Achieving Carbon Neutrality Pledge through Clean Energy Transition: Linking the Role of Green Innovation and Environmental Policy in E7 Countries , 2022, Energies.

[12]  J. Álvarez‐García,et al.  Analysing the influence of foreign direct investment and urbanization on the development of private financial system and its ecological footprint , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  Atif Jahanger,et al.  Do technological innovation and urbanization mitigate carbon dioxide emissions from the transport sector? , 2022, Technology in Society.

[14]  Wu Sun,et al.  Does financial inclusion promote investment and affect residents' happiness?—Evidence from China , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[15]  Syed Ahtsham Ali,et al.  Alternative energy and natural resources in determining environmental sustainability: a look at the role of government final consumption expenditures in France , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[16]  Jixin Cheng,et al.  Can Digital Finance Promote Comprehensive Carbon Emission Performance? Evidence from Chinese Cities , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[17]  Feipeng Guo,et al.  Research on Determining the Critical Influencing Factors of Carbon Emission Integrating GRA with an Improved STIRPAT Model: Taking the Yangtze River Delta as an Example , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  Atif Jahanger,et al.  The Impact of Hydropower Energy in Malaysia Under the EKC Hypothesis: Evidence From Quantile ARDL Approach , 2022, SAGE Open.

[19]  Buhari Doğan,et al.  The role of biomass energy consumption and economic complexity on environmental sustainability in G7 economies , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[20]  Cai Li,et al.  Dissipating environmental pollution in the BRICS economies: do urbanization, globalization, energy innovation, and financial development matter? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[21]  M. Usman,et al.  Do Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, and Environmental-Related Technologies Asymmetrically Reduce Ecological Footprint? Evidence from Pakistan , 2022, Energies.

[22]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Testing the role of economic complexity on the ecological footprint in China: a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach , 2022, Energy & Environment.

[23]  Najabat Ali,et al.  The effect of renewable energy development, market regulation, and environmental innovation on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[24]  M. Usman,et al.  The Impact of Green Investment, Technological Innovation, and Globalization on CO2 Emissions: Evidence From MINT Countries , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[25]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  Structural emissions reduction of China's power and heating industry under the goal of "Double Carbon": A perspective from input-output analysis , 2022, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[26]  Liying Li,et al.  Does sustainable financial inclusion and energy efficiency ensure green environment? Evidence from B.R.I.C.S. countries , 2022, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[27]  A. Chandio,et al.  How does economic complexity affect ecological footprint in G-7 economies: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumptions and testing EKC hypothesis , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[28]  J. Popp,et al.  Financial Inclusion, Technological Innovations, and Environmental Quality: Analyzing the Role of Green Openness , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[29]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Institutional factors-environmental quality nexus in BRICS: a strategic pillar of governmental performance , 2022, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[30]  S. Ullah,et al.  Environmental concerns of financial inclusion and economic policy uncertainty in the era of globalization: evidence from low & high globalized OECD economies , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[31]  Sana Ullah,et al.  Financial inclusion and its influence on economic-environmental performance: demand and supply perspectives , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[32]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  The criticality of tourism development, economic complexity, and country security on ecological footprint , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[33]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  A non-linear analysis of the impacts of natural resources and education on environmental quality: Green energy and its role in the future , 2022, Resources Policy.

[34]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations , 2022, Resources Policy.

[35]  X. Vo,et al.  Decomposing Scale and Technique Effects of Financial Development and Foreign Direct Investment on Renewable Energy Consumption , 2022 .

[36]  M. Usman,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Economic Complexity and the Transition to a Clean Energy Pattern on Ecological Footprint From the Indian Perspective , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[37]  M. Ramzan,et al.  Does Globalization Moderate the Effect of Economic Complexity on CO2 Emissions? Evidence From the Top 10 Energy Transition Economies , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[38]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  The role of economic complexity in the environmental Kuznets curve of MINT economies: evidence from method of moments quantile regression , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[39]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Revisiting the EKC hypothesis by assessing the complementarities between fiscal, monetary, and environmental development policies in China , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[40]  Nabila Amin,et al.  Dynamic linkages of financial inclusion, modernization, and environmental sustainability in South Asia: a panel data analysis , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[41]  M. Usman,et al.  Pollution concern during globalization mode in financially resource-rich countries: Do financial development, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption matter? , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[42]  J. Martins,et al.  Modeling the Relationship Between Economic Complexity and Environmental Degradation: Evidence From Top Seven Economic Complexity Countries , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[43]  Giray Gozgor,et al.  Effects of Age Dependency and Urbanization on Energy Demand in BRICS: Evidence From the Machine Learning Estimator , 2021, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[44]  N. Leitão,et al.  The Impact of Renewable Energy and Economic Complexity on Carbon Emissions in BRICS Countries under the EKC Scheme , 2021, Energies.

[45]  Kangjuan Lv,et al.  Economic complexity, tourism, energy prices, and environmental degradation in the top economic complexity countries: fresh panel evidence , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[46]  A. Ashraf,et al.  The Ecological Footprints of Greenfield FDI and Cross-border M&A Sales , 2021, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[47]  U. Pata,et al.  On the interaction between fiscal policy and CO2 emissions in G7 countries: 1875–2016 , 2021, Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[48]  Umer Shahzad,et al.  Does economic complexity matter for environmental sustainability? Using ecological footprint as an indicator , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[49]  F. Ganda.  The non-linear influence of trade, foreign direct investment, financial development, energy supply and human capital on carbon emissions in the BRICS , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[50]  M. Madaleno,et al.  Does export product quality and renewable energy induce carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from leading complex and renewable energy economies , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[51]  W. Cai,et al.  Nonlinear influence of urbanization on China's urban residential building carbon emissions: New evidence from panel threshold model. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[52]  Buhari Doğan,et al.  Role of economic complexity to induce renewable energy: contextual evidence from G7 and E7 countries , 2021 .

[53]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Does financial inclusion limit carbon dioxide emissions? Analyzing the role of globalization and renewable electricity output , 2021 .

[54]  Zübeyde Şentürk Ulucak,et al.  Can renewable energy be used as an effective tool in the decarbonization of the Mediterranean region: fresh evidence under cross-sectional dependence , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[55]  L. Chu,et al.  Environmental quality and the role of economic policy uncertainty, economic complexity, renewable energy, and energy intensity: the case of G7 countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[56]  M. Haseeb,et al.  Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS- does renewable and non-renewable energy matter? , 2021 .

[57]  Eyup Dogan,et al.  Which households are more energy vulnerable? Energy poverty and financial inclusion in Turkey , 2021, Energy Economics.

[58]  Rizwan Raheem Ahmed,et al.  Foreign Direct Investments, Renewable Electricity Output, and Ecological Footprints: Do Financial Globalization Facilitate Renewable Energy Transition and Environmental Welfare in Bangladesh? , 2021, Asia-Pacific Financial Markets.

[59]  F. Bekun,et al.  MODELLING THE IMPACT OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND URBANIZATION ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN SOUTH AFRICA: ASSESSING THE MODERATING ROLE OF HUMAN CAPITAL , 2021 .

[60]  A. Rehman,et al.  Mitigations pathways towards sustainable development: Assessing the influence of fiscal and monetary policies on carbon emissions in BRICS economies , 2021 .

[61]  S. Zaidi,et al.  Dynamic linkages between financial inclusion and carbon emissions: Evidence from selected OECD countries , 2021, Resources, Environment and Sustainability.

[62]  Cem Işık,et al.  Do inward foreign direct investment and economic development improve local environmental quality: aggregation bias puzzle , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[63]  Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary,et al.  The nexus between financial inclusion and economic development: Comparison of old and new EU member countries , 2021 .

[64]  M. Sarfraz,et al.  Envisaging the asymmetrical association among FDI, ICT, and climate change: a case from developing country , 2021 .

[65]  M. Usman,et al.  Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries , 2021 .

[66]  A. Isiksal.  Testing the effect of sustainable energy and military expenses on environmental degradation: evidence from the states with the highest military expenses , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[67]  Wenxiu Hu,et al.  Digital Financial Inclusion and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Study , 2021 .

[68]  Huaping Sun,et al.  Energy carbon emission reduction of China’s transportation sector: An input–output approach , 2020 .

[69]  Shuangqi Li,et al.  Energy-related CO2 emissions and structural emissions’ reduction in China’s agriculture: An input–output perspective , 2020 .

[70]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital , 2020 .

[71]  Nadia Doytch.  The impact of foreign direct investment on the ecological footprints of nations , 2020, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators.

[72]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for deforestation in Bangladesh: An ARDL analysis with multiple structural breaks , 2020, Energy, Ecology and Environment.

[73]  Buhari Doğan,et al.  The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries , 2020 .

[74]  U. Pata.  Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[75]  K. Jermsittiparsert,et al.  The role of tourism and renewable energy in testing the environmental Kuznets curve in the BRICS countries: fresh evidence from methods of moments quantile regression , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[76]  D. Vo,et al.  Financial inclusion and stability in the Asian region using bank-level data , 2020, Borsa Istanbul Review.

[77]  Chuanwang Sun,et al.  Do financial development, urbanization and trade affect environmental quality? Evidence from China , 2020 .

[78]  Mohamed Benbouziane,et al.  Examining the driving factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model: the case of Algeria , 2020 .

[79]  L. Chu.  Economic structure and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: new evidence from economic complexity , 2020 .

[80]  Malepekola Precious Monaheng,et al.  The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[81]  Quocviet Bui,et al.  The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[82]  Kyle S. Herman,et al.  Environmental regulatory spillovers, institutions, and clean technology innovation: A panel of 32 countries over 16 years , 2020 .

[83]  Muhammad Tariq Majeed,et al.  Asymmetric effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions of BRICS economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[84]  Danish,et al.  Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization , 2020 .

[85]  Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary,et al.  Does financial inclusion impact CO2 emissions? Evidence from Asia , 2020 .

[86]  N. Odhiambo,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment, Information Technology and Economic Growth Dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2019, Telecommunications Policy.

[87]  M. Pesaran.  General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels , 2004, Empirical Economics.

[88]  Muhammad Rafiq,et al.  Brownfield, greenfield, and renewable energy consumption: Moderating role of effective governance , 2020, Energy & Environment.

[89]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Fiscal policy and CO2 emissions from heterogeneous fuel sources in Thailand: Evidence from multiple structural breaks cointegration test. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[90]  Junxian Liu,et al.  Combined nonlinear effects of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from a panel data partially linear additive model , 2019, Energy.

[91]  Abdul Rauf,et al.  Does Energy-Growth and Environment Quality Matter for Agriculture Sector in Pakistan or not? An Application of Cointegration Approach , 2019, Energies.

[92]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[93]  Heng Li,et al.  Revealing stylized empirical interactions among construction sector, urbanization, energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in China. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[94]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[95]  J. Raji,et al.  Greenfield, Mergers & Acquisitions, Energy Consumption, and Environmental Performance in selected SAARC and ASEAN countries , 2019 .

[96]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Research on influencing factors of environmental pollution in China: A spatial econometric analysis , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[97]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: Accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[98]  R. M. Adeel-Farooq,et al.  Green field investment and environmental performance: A case of selected nine developing countries of Asia , 2018 .

[99]  M. Hassan,et al.  Financial inclusion and economic growth in OIC countries , 2018 .

[100]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Unpacking systemic innovation capacity as strategic ambidexterity: How projects dynamically configure capabilities for agricultural innovation , 2017 .

[101]  S. Narayan,et al.  Does FDI influence renewable energy consumption? An analysis of sectoral FDI impact on renewable and non-renewable industrial energy consumption , 2016 .

[102]  E. Dumitrescu,et al.  Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels , 2012 .

[103]  Shinji Kaneko,et al.  Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis , 2010 .

[104]  J. Westerlund.  Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data , 2006 .

[105]  Takashi Yamagata,et al.  Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[106]  M. Pesaran.  A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence , 2003 .

[107]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Rethinking the Environmental Impacts of Population , Affluence and Technology ’ , 2003 .

[108]  M. Hashem Pesaran,et al.  Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels , 1999 .

[109]  M. Hashem Pesaran,et al.  The Role of Economic Theory in Modelling the Long Run , 1997 .