Design and Characterization of an Exoskeleton for Perturbing the Knee During Gait

Objective: An improved understanding of mechanical impedance modulation in human joints would provide insights about the neuromechanics underlying functional movements. Experimental estimation of impedance requires specialized tools with highly reproducible perturbation dynamics and reliable measurement capabilities. This paper presents the design and mechanical characterization of the ETH Knee Perturbator: an actuated exoskeleton for perturbing the knee during gait. Methods: A novel wearable perturbation device was developed based on specific experimental objectives. Bench-top tests validated the device's torque limiting capability and characterized the time delays of the on-board clutch. Further tests demonstrated the device's ability to perform system identification on passive loads with static initial conditions. Finally, the ability of the device to consistently perturb human gait was evaluated through a pilot study on three unimpaired subjects. Results: The ETH Knee Perturbator is capable of identifying mass-spring systems within 15% accuracy, accounting for over 95% of the variance in the observed torque in 10 out of 16 cases. Five-degree extension and flexion perturbations were executed on human subjects with an onset timing precision of 2.52% of swing phase duration and a rise time of 36.5 ms. Conclusion: The ETH Knee Perturbator can deliver safe, precisely timed, and controlled perturbations, which is a prerequisite for the estimation of knee joint impedance during gait. Significance: Tools such as this can enhance models of neuromuscular control, which may improve rehabilitative outcomes following impairments affecting gait and advance the design and control of assistive devices.

[1]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  S. Prentice,et al.  Adaptation to unilateral change in lower limb mechanical properties during human walking , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Todd A Kuiken,et al.  Trip recovery strategies following perturbations of variable duration. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  The Difference Between Stiffness and Quasi-Stiffness in the Context of Biomechanical Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Design of a wearable perturbator for human knee impedance estimation during gait , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[6]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  Considering Limb Impedance in the Design and Control of Prosthetic Devices , 2014 .

[7]  Jaime Prat Pastor,et al.  Development of a hinge compatible with the kinematics of the knee joint , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[9]  N. Hogan,et al.  Time-Varying Ankle Mechanical Impedance During Human Locomotion , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  MIT-Skywalker: A novel environment for neural gait rehabilitation , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[11]  J. S. Rovick,et al.  External knee joint design based on normal motion. , 1985, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  Thomas Sinkjær,et al.  Mobile ankle and knee perturbator , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Lock Your Robot: A Review of Locking Devices in Robotics , 2015, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[14]  Robert Riener,et al.  Model-Based Estimation of Knee Stiffness , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Joyce P Trost,et al.  Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[16]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[17]  Roger Gassert,et al.  An adaptive and robust online method to predict gait events , 2016, EMBC.

[18]  R. Riener,et al.  Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[19]  V. Dietz,et al.  Single joint perturbation during gait: neuronal control of movement trajectory , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  A Bilateral Ankle Manipulator to Investigate Human Balance Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  A. Dollar,et al.  Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness of the Human Hip in the Stance Phase of Walking , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  D. J. Bennett Torques generated at the human elbow joint in response to constant position errors imposed during voluntary movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  Effects on Normal Gait of a New Active Knee Orthosis for Hemiparetic Gait Retraining , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  I W Hunter,et al.  System identification of human joint dynamics. , 1990, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[25]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  A Highly Backdrivable, Lightweight Knee Actuator for Investigating Gait in Stroke , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[26]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Closed-loop multivariable system identification for the characterization of the dynamic arm compliance using continuous force disturbances: a model study , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  M. Tomizuka,et al.  A Gait Monitoring System Based on Air Pressure Sensors Embedded in a Shoe , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[28]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A robotic device for manipulating human stepping , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[29]  R. Waters,et al.  The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[30]  E Burdet,et al.  A method for measuring endpoint stiffness during multi-joint arm movements. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[32]  Daniel Ludvig,et al.  The dynamic effect of muscle activation on knee stiffness , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  Robert Riener,et al.  Knee stiffness estimation in physiological gait , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  Kimberly A. Ingraham,et al.  Configuring a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis for Transfemoral Amputees within Five Specific Ambulation Modes , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  U. Croce,et al.  A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[36]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  Transfemoral amputee recovery strategies following trips to their sound and prosthesis sides throughout swing phase , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[37]  Katherine S. Rudolph,et al.  Gait recovery in healthy subjects: Perturbations to the knee motion with a Smart Knee Brace , 2010, AIM 2010.

[38]  N. Mrachacz-Kersting,et al.  Characterisation of the quadriceps stretch reflex during the transition from swing to stance phase of human walking , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  N. Mrachacz-Kersting,et al.  Reflex and non-reflex torque responses to stretch of the human knee extensors , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  C. Robinson,et al.  Knee elasticity influenced by joint angle and perturbation intensity. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[41]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Feasibility Study of a Wearable Exoskeleton for Children: Is the Gait Altered by Adding Masses on Lower Limbs? , 2013, PloS one.

[42]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[43]  I. W. Hunter,et al.  System identification of human triceps surae stretch reflex dynamics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Elliott J. Rouse,et al.  Estimation of Human Ankle Impedance During the Stance Phase of Walking , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[45]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a new mechatronic platform for assessment and prevention of fall risks , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[46]  W. Rymer,et al.  In vivo human knee joint dynamic properties as functions of muscle contraction and joint position. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  C. Hsieh,et al.  Dynamic behavior and modelling of the pre-sliding static friction , 2000 .

[48]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  Design of a Multidisc Electromechanical Brake , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.