Information technology, knowledge management and human resource management

Drawing on dynamic capability view, this study aims to offer a conceptual framework to clarify the nature of the effects of firm’s information technology (IT) capability, knowledge management (KM) capability and human resource management (HRM) capability on organizational business performance. IT is the driver that changes all aspects of doing business in the digital era, while both knowledge and human resources (HR) are being increasingly regarded as key levers of competitive advantage in today’s global, dynamic and complex business environment.,The survey methodology was used to collect data. To clarify the relationships between IT capability, KM capability and organizational business performance, the qualitative literature review has been conducted. This review has revealed the three structural models presenting possible interactions between observed constructs. Confirmatory factor analysis has been used for the evaluation of proposed measurement models while structural equation modeling has been used for structural models’ assessments and hypotheses testing.,IT capability enhances HRM capability which enhances KM capability. As a result, KM capability together with IT capability enhances organizational business performance. In addition, there is an interaction effect of KM capability and HRM capability on business performance.,First, the sample is based on the emerging economy firms. Second, the use of a self-rating performance measure may be a limitation of the study. Third, the data are not completely normally distributed. Fourth, specificities of different industries were not the subject of analysis in this paper. This should be considered in the interpretation and understanding of the results.,From managerial point of view, the paper indicates what managers can do to master their dynamic capabilities, especially those relevant to the business in the digital era. Firms are urged to develop and improve their capabilities to face dynamic environment and intense competition, as well as business globalization. However, to improve certain capability, firms should develop others as well because of their interconnectedness.,The main academic contribution of this study is reflected through the development of the integrative model which is aimed at identifying the interrelationships among IT, KM, HRM and business performance. The results indicate the importance of observing interconnections between the firms’ various capabilities to verify the premise of the dynamic capability view. This paper identified relationships between most prominent firm’s resources for the digital era: knowledge, HR and IT. The results show causes and effects of relationships between capabilities related to these resources.

[1]  Holger Steinmetz,et al.  Three Approaches to Estimate Latent Interaction Effects: Intention and Perceived Behavioral Control in the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2011 .

[2]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[4]  Késia Rozzett,et al.  Human resources management policies and practices scale (HRMPPS): exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis , 2012 .

[5]  S. Liao,et al.  The Relationship among Knowledge Management, Organizational Learning, and Organizational Performance , 2009 .

[6]  J. Barney,et al.  Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 2007 .

[7]  Eric Tsui,et al.  The role of IT in KM: where are we now and where are we heading? , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  Exploring the role of knowledge management practices on exports: A dynamic capabilities view , 2014 .

[9]  Aino Kianto,et al.  The impact of intellectual capital management on company competitiveness and financial performance , 2013 .

[10]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Isabel M. Prieto,et al.  Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices , 2014 .

[12]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Ten Fallacies of Availability and Reliability Analysis , 2008, ISAS.

[13]  D. Bandalos The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling , 2002 .

[14]  Narayan Ramasubbu,et al.  How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance , 2011, MIS Q..

[15]  Jie Yang The knowledge management strategy and its effect on firm performance: A contingency analysis , 2010 .

[16]  Peter H. Gray,et al.  The impact of knowledge repositories on power and control in the workplace , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[17]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[18]  C. Chou,et al.  The curvilinear relationships between responsive and proactive market orientations and new product performance: A contingent link , 2008 .

[19]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Angela Titi Amayah Determinants of knowledge sharing in a public sector organization , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Ana Pérez-Luño,et al.  Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity , 2009 .

[23]  Yao-Sheng Liao The effect of human resource management control systems on the relationship between knowledge management strategy and firm performance , 2011 .

[24]  José Manuel Montes Peón,et al.  Human Resource Practices, Organizational Learning and Business Performance , 2005 .

[25]  Roelof P. uit Beijerse Questions in knowledge management: defining and conceptualising a phenomenon , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  M. Shaw,et al.  A strategic analysis of inter organizational information sharing , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Matti Pohjola,et al.  The New Economy: facts, impacts and policies , 2002, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[28]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[29]  Teresa L. Ju,et al.  A contingency model for knowledge management capability and innovation , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[30]  Dovev Lavie The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[31]  Fawzy Soliman,et al.  Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resources management , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[32]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[33]  A. Lockett,et al.  The Development of the Resource-Based View of the Firm: A Critical Appraisal , 2009 .

[34]  A. Comrey Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  Gary Klein,et al.  IT support in manufacturing firms for a knowledge management dynamic capability link to performance , 2007 .

[36]  M. Browne Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[37]  Salleh Yahya,et al.  Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[39]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  M. Gloet,et al.  Knowledge management and the links to HRM: Developing leadership and management capabilities to support sustainability , 2006 .

[41]  A. Goktan,et al.  Innovation speed and radicalness: are they inversely related? , 2011 .

[42]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The influence of technology on the future of human resource management , 2015 .

[43]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[44]  Christina Ling-Hsing Chang,et al.  The role of organizational culture in the knowledge management process , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[45]  Victor Oltra,et al.  Knowledge management effectiveness factors: the role of HRM , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[46]  Harry Scarbrough,et al.  Towards a second generation of KM? The people management challenge , 2001 .

[47]  D. Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture , 2011 .

[48]  Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Studying the effect of HRM practices on the knowledge management process , 2012 .

[49]  Hui-Ling Huang,et al.  Knowledge management fit and its implications for business performance: A profile deviation analysis , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[50]  Susana Pérez López,et al.  Information Technology Competency, Knowledge Processes and Firm Performance , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[51]  I. Edvardsson HRM and knowledge management , 2008 .

[52]  Rory L. Chase,et al.  Knowledge Management Benchmarks , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[53]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[54]  Xiangyang Wang,et al.  Organizational unlearning and organizational relearning: a dynamic process of knowledge management , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[55]  D. Griffith,et al.  The Influence of Competitive Intensity and Market Dynamism on Knowledge Management Capabilities of Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries , 2005 .

[56]  Emma Parry,et al.  Desired goals and actual outcomes of e‐HRM , 2011 .

[57]  Lori N. K. Leonard,et al.  The Human Resource's Influence in Shaping IT Competence , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[58]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Introducing Lisrel: A Guide for the Uninitiated , 2000 .

[59]  D. Hislop Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment: A review and research agenda , 2003 .

[60]  Roman Kmieciak,et al.  Innovativeness, empowerment and IT capability: Evidence from SMEs , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[61]  Tony S. Wirjanto,et al.  Path Dependence of Dynamic Information Technology Capability: An Empirical Investigation , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Victor Y. Haines,et al.  Information technology usage and human resource roles and effectiveness , 2008 .

[63]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  The relationship between human resource management practices, business strategy and firm performance: evidence from steel industry in Taiwan , 2010 .

[64]  Hung-Tai Tsou,et al.  Service Delivery Innovation , 2009 .

[65]  Byung Gon Kim,et al.  An Integrated View of Knowledge Management for Performance , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[66]  Paul P. Tallon Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility , 2008, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[67]  Patrick S. W. Fong,et al.  Visualizing Evolution of Knowledge Management Capability in Construction Firms , 2013 .