“Phase capture” in the perception of interpolated shape: cue combination and the influence function

This study was concerned with what stimulus information observers use to judge the shape of simple objects. We used a string of four Gabor patches to define a contour. A fifth, center patch served as a test pattern. The observers' task was to judge the location of the test pattern relative to the contour. The contour was either a straight line, or an arc with positive or negative curvature (the radius of curvature was either 2 or 6 deg). We asked whether phase shifts in the inner or outer pairs of patches distributed along the contour influence the perceived shape. That is, we measured the phase shift influence function. We found that shifting the inner patches of the string by 0.25 cycle results in almost complete phase capture (attraction) at the smallest separation (2 lambda), and the capture effect falls off rapidly with separation. A 0.25 cycle shift of the outer pair of patches has a much smaller effect, in the opposite direction (repulsion). In our experiments, the contour is defined by two cues--the cue provided by the Gabor carrier (the 'feature' cue) and that defined by the Gaussian envelope (the 'envelope' cue). Our phase shift influence function can be thought of as a cue combination task. An ideal observer would weight the cues by the inverse variance of the two cues. The variance in each of these cues predicts the main features of our results quite accurately.

[1]  M J Morgan,et al.  Vernier acuity predicted from changes in the light distribution of the retinal image. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[2]  Richard F Murray,et al.  A linear cue combination framework for understanding selective attention. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[3]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses , 2002, Science.

[4]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Detecting disorder in spatial vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[5]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Paul V. McGraw,et al.  Alignment of separated patches: multiple location tags , 1999, Vision Research.

[7]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Unmasking the mechanisms for Vernier acuity: evidence for a template model for Vernier acuity , 2000, Vision Research.

[8]  J. M. Zanker,et al.  How To Tell Circles from Ellipses: Perceiving the Regularity of Simple Shapes , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[9]  S. Klein,et al.  Seeing circles: what limits shape perception? , 2000, Vision Research.

[10]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Integration of local features into a global shape , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  M. Landy,et al.  A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues , 1993, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Levi,et al.  Integration of local orientation in strabismic amblyopia , 1998, Vision Research.

[14]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Classification images for detection and position discrimination in the fovea and parafovea. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[15]  M. Morgan,et al.  Efficiency of locating centres of dot-clusters by human observers , 1991, Vision Research.

[16]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[17]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[18]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[19]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  The visual assessment of the spatial location of a bright bar , 1988, Vision Research.

[20]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Constraints on long range interactions mediating contour detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  R. Hess,et al.  Discriminating local continuity in curved figures , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  M J Morgan,et al.  Stimulus features that determine the visual location of a bright bar. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  David Whitaker,et al.  Isolation of stimulus characteristics contributing to Weber's law for position , 2002, Vision Research.

[25]  D. Levi,et al.  The influence of adaptation on perceived visual location , 1997, Vision Research.

[26]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[27]  David Whitaker,et al.  Geometric representation of the mechanisms underlying human curvature detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[28]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Integration regions for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[29]  R. Jacobs What determines visual cue reliability? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[31]  D. Whitaker What part of a vernier stimulus determines performance? , 1993, Vision Research.

[32]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Influence function for visual interpolation , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[33]  D M Levi,et al.  Spatial-interval discrimination in the human fovea: what delimits the interval? , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[35]  D. Levi,et al.  Integration of local pattern elements into a global shape in human vision. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  R. J. Watt,et al.  The detection of deviation from straightness in lines , 1987, Vision Research.

[37]  David Badcock,et al.  Localization of element clusters by the human visual system , 1994, Vision Research.

[38]  D M Levi,et al.  The effect of contour closure on shape perception. , 1999, Spatial vision.