Communication in Nuclear Emergency Preparedness: A Closer Look at Information Reception

Preparedness of the general population plays a key role in the effective implementation of protective actions in case of a nuclear emergency (e.g., evacuation or intake of iodine tablets). In this context, a good communication of emergency management actors with the public along the entire cycle of preparedness-response-recovery is of paramount importance. This article aims at providing a better understanding of the way people process communicated messages and the factors that may influence how they do this. In particular, it investigates information reception as part of the information processing in precrisis communication. As a case study, the precrisis communication context was chosen, as it has been tackled to a lesser extent in the literature. The empirical data used for this study originated from a large-scale opinion survey in Belgium. One topic in this survey addressed the information campaign for the distribution of iodine tablets, in the context of preparedness for nuclear emergencies. The findings of this study demonstrate that systematic predictors have a stronger influence on information reception, as compared to heuristic predictors. The latter are only to a minor extent involved in the reception of emergency preparedness information. The hypothesized pattern--that more specific knowledge about the field relates to a higher reception of information--was confirmed for precrisis communication. Contrary to expectations, results showed that people with a high perception of radiation risks were less attentive to information about protective actions. People with little confidence in authorities were also more likely to have a low reception of information.

[1]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[3]  H. Paek,et al.  Information Processing of Genetically Modified Food Messages Under Different Motives: An Adaptation of the Multiple‐Motive Heuristic‐Systematic Model , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The role of mood and message ambiguity in the interplay of heuristic and systematic processing , 1994 .

[5]  R. Meertens,et al.  How Does the General Public Evaluate Risk Information? The Impact of Associations with Other Risks , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Karl Dake Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk , 1992 .

[7]  G. Bohner,et al.  Mood and persuasion: independent effects of affect before and after message processing. , 1994, The Journal of social psychology.

[8]  John B. Best,et al.  Cognitive psychology, 5th ed. , 1999 .

[9]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. , 1999, Environmental research.

[11]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perception of Risk From Radiation , 1996 .

[12]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Partisan Cues and the Media: Information Flows in the 1992 Presidential Election , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[13]  L. Sjöberg MYTHS OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC PARADIGM AND HOW THEY CAN MISINFORM RISK COMMUNICATION , 2006 .

[14]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1987 .

[15]  Vivianne H M Visschers,et al.  Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[17]  Annie Lang,et al.  The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages , 1999 .

[18]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Morality Information, Performance Information, and the Distinction Between Trust and Confidence1 , 2006 .

[19]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions , 1993 .

[20]  B. Jones The politics of attention , 2005 .

[21]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[22]  André Blais,et al.  Testing Zaller’s Reception and Acceptance Model in an Intense Election Campaign , 2008 .

[23]  M. Korstanje The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[24]  Robert J. Griffin,et al.  Energy in the Eighties: Education, Communication, and the Knowledge Gap , 1990 .

[25]  Annie Lang Using the Limited Capacity Model of Motivated Mediated Message Processing to Design Effective Cancer Communication Messages , 2006 .

[26]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  G. Gaskell,et al.  GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[29]  Timothy C. Earle,et al.  Social Trust , 1995 .

[30]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[31]  Arne Öhman,et al.  As fast as the blink of an eye: Evolutionary preparedness for preattentive processing of threat. , 1997 .

[32]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986 .

[33]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Seeking and Processing Information about Impersonal Risk , 2006 .

[34]  U. Beck Living in the world risk society , 2006 .

[35]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  C. Robertson,et al.  Communicating information in an emergency preparedness pill distribution campaign. , 2008, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[37]  R. Griffin,et al.  Risk Information Seeking Among U.S. and Dutch Residents , 2009 .

[38]  J. Zaller,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion: Preface , 1992 .

[39]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Chronic issue-specific fear inhibits systematic processing of persuasive communications. , 1990 .

[40]  Lennart Sj Are Received Risk Perception Models Alive and Well , 2002 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk. , 1983 .

[42]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste , 1991, Science.

[43]  J. Zaller,et al.  WHO GETS THE NEWS? ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF NEWS RECEPTION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH , 1993 .

[44]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Automatic and controlled processing revisited. , 1984, Psychological review.

[45]  K. Pijawka,et al.  Reversing NIMBY: An Assessment of State Strategies for Siting Hazardous-Waste Facilities , 1999 .

[46]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  After the Flood , 2008 .

[47]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Uneven progress: Social psychology and the study of attitudes. , 1992 .

[48]  J. Shao,et al.  PSEUDO-R 2 IN LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODEL , 2006 .

[49]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[50]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model , 2011 .

[51]  Ortwin Renn Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[52]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[53]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[54]  Lennart Sj Local Acceptance of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository , 2004 .

[55]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Information Processing and Risk Perception: An Adaptation of the Heuristic-Systematic Model , 2002 .

[56]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .