Diffusion-Based Model for Synaptic Molecular Communication Channel

Computational methods have been extensively used to understand the underlying dynamics of molecular communication methods employed by nature. One very effective and popular approach is to utilize a Monte Carlo simulation. Although it is very reliable, this method can have a very high computational cost, which in some cases renders the simulation impractical. Therefore, in this paper, for the special case of an excitatory synaptic molecular communication channel, we present a novel mathematical model for the diffusion and binding of neurotransmitters that takes into account the effects of synaptic geometry in 3-D space and re-absorption of neurotransmitters by the transmitting neuron. Based on this model we develop a fast deterministic algorithm, which calculates expected value of the output of this channel, namely, the amplitude of excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP), for given synaptic parameters. We validate our algorithm by a Monte Carlo simulation, which shows total agreement between the results of the two methods. Finally, we utilize our model to quantify the effects of variation in synaptic parameters, such as position of release site, receptor density, size of postsynaptic density, diffusion coefficient, uptake probability, and number of neurotransmitters in a vesicle, on maximum number of bound receptors that directly affect the peak amplitude of EPSP.

[1]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Nanonetworks: A new communication paradigm , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[2]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Molecular communication nanonetworks inside human body , 2012, Nano Commun. Networks.

[3]  A. L. Edelstein,et al.  Collective binding properties of receptor arrays. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[4]  J. Henley,et al.  Shaping the synaptic signal: molecular mobility inside and outside the cleft , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Book Review , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Stevens,et al.  Facilitation and depression at single central synapses , 1995, Neuron.

[7]  M. J. Friedlander,et al.  The time course and amplitude of EPSPs evoked at synapses between pairs of CA3/CA1 neurons in the hippocampal slice , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  Gang Tong,et al.  Block of glutamate transporters potentiates postsynaptic excitation , 1994, Neuron.

[9]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Communication theoretical understanding of intra-body nervous nanonetworks , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  A Monte Carlo model reveals independent signaling at central glutamatergic synapses. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[11]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Propagation of electrical signals along giant nerve fibres , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[12]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  A Physical Channel Model for Nanoscale Neuro-Spike Communications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[13]  J. Clements Transmitter timecourse in the synaptic cleft: its role in central synaptic function , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  On the capacity of diffusion-based molecular communications with SiNW FET-based receiver , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[15]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Diversity in diffusion-based molecular communication channel with drift , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[16]  Cha-Min Tang,et al.  Saturation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors after quantal release of transmitter , 1994, Neuron.

[17]  Francesco Ventriglia,et al.  A Brownian simulation model of glutamate synaptic diffusion in the femtosecond time scale , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent Sources of Quantal Variability at Single Glutamatergic Synapses , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  N. Danbolt Glutamate uptake , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[20]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Fundamentals of Molecular Information and Communication Science , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[22]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  A queueing-theoretical delay analysis for intra-body nervous nanonetwork , 2015, Nano Commun. Networks.

[23]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[24]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Molecular Communication and Networking: Opportunities and Challenges , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[25]  Thomas A. Nielsen,et al.  Modulation of Glutamate Mobility Reveals the Mechanism Underlying Slow-Rising AMPAR EPSCs and the Diffusion Coefficient in the Synaptic Cleft , 2004, Neuron.

[26]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Communication in Neuronal Nano-Network , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[27]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  A Communication Theoretical Analysis of Synaptic Multiple-Access Channel in Hippocampal-Cortical Neurons , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[28]  Christof Koch,et al.  Detecting and Estimating Signals over Noisy and Unreliable Synapses: Information-Theoretic Analysis , 2001, Neural Computation.

[29]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Synaptic Channel Model Including Effects of Spike Width Variation , 2015, NANOCOM.

[30]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  On the Physical Design of Molecular Communication Receiver Based on Nanoscale Biosensors , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[31]  L. Savtchenko,et al.  The optimal height of the synaptic cleft , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Oscar Herreras,et al.  The Influence of Synaptic Size on AMPA Receptor Activation: A Monte Carlo Model , 2015, PloS one.