Switching Gains for Semiactive Damping via Nonconvex Lyapunov Functions

Gain switching is proven to be an effective technique for semiactive damping of vibrating structures. Typically, switching control is based on convex, in particular quadratic, Lyapunov functions, which impose conservative solutions. In this brief we propose a switching technique based on ad hoc nonconvex Lyapunov functions, recently introduced in the literature. Remarkable advantages can be shown by considering well-known criteria such as L2 and H∞. We propose a switching strategy based on the minimum of quadratic Lyapunov functions and we show that such a strategy outperforms the effect achieved with the optimal constant gain. Explicit bounds can be assured. The scheme is amenable for implementation as very simple tools such as Lyapunov and Riccati equations are involved. Results are also validated by simulations of a realistic building structure under seismic action, based on the recorded data of the El Centro earthquake.

[1]  Patrizio Colaneri,et al.  Dynamic Output Feedback Control of Switched Linear Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Rolf Isermann,et al.  Mechatronic semi-active and active vehicle suspensions , 2004 .

[3]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  STATE OF THE ART OF STRUCTURAL CONTROL , 2003 .

[4]  Carlo Novara,et al.  Semi-Active Suspension Control Using “Fast” Model-Predictive Techniques , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[5]  S. Ge,et al.  Stability Theory of Switched Dynamical Systems , 2011 .

[6]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[7]  Tingshu Hu,et al.  Stabilization of Switched Systems via Composite Quadratic Functions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Jamal Daafouz,et al.  Dynamic output feedback Hinfinity control of switched linear systems , 2011, Autom..

[9]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  Semiactive vibration control of offshore wind turbine towers with tuned liquid column dampers using H∞ output feedback control , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications.

[10]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review , 1999 .

[11]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  Decentralized control for multichannel active vibration isolation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[12]  E. Yaz Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Claude Richard,et al.  Self-powered circuit for broadband, multimodal piezoelectric vibration control , 2008 .

[14]  A. Preumont Vibration Control of Active Structures , 1997 .

[15]  L. Sievers,et al.  Active Narrow-Band Vibration Isolation Of Machinery Noise From Resonant Substructures , 1993 .

[16]  James Lam,et al.  Semi-active H∞ control of vehicle suspension with magneto-rheological dampers , 2005 .

[17]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Active and semi-active vibration isolation , 1995 .

[18]  Jamal Daafouz,et al.  Suboptimal Switching State Feedback Control Consistency Analysis for Switched Linear Systems , 2011 .

[19]  Chih-Kung Lee,et al.  Design of Switching Damping Control for Smart Structure Self-Powered Adaptive Damping Control , 2010 .

[20]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Stabilizability of switched linear systems does not imply the existence of convex Lyapunov functions , 2006, CDC.

[21]  Jamal Daafouz,et al.  Dynamic output feedback Hºº control of switched linear systems. , 2011 .

[22]  S. Narayanan,et al.  Optimal semi-active preview control response of a half car vehicle model with magnetorheological damper , 2009 .

[23]  Brian R. Mace,et al.  Effects of magneto-rheological damper performance limitations on semi-active isolation of tonal and broadband vibration , 2006 .

[24]  M. Balas Direct Velocity Feedback Control of Large Space Structures , 1979 .

[25]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Plate with decentralised velocity feedback loops: Power absorption and kinetic energy considerations , 2012 .

[26]  Alberto Cavallo,et al.  Active Control of Flexible Structures , 2010 .

[27]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  Active control of vibration, 1st edition , 1996 .

[28]  Alberto Cavallo,et al.  Active Control of Flexible Structures: From Modeling to Implementation , 2010 .

[29]  Kisaburo Hayakawa,et al.  Robust H∞-output feedback control of decoupled automobile active suspension systems , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[30]  Mickaël Lallart,et al.  Self-Powered and Low-Power Piezoelectric Vibration Control Using Nonlinear Approaches , 2010 .

[31]  P. Makila,et al.  Computational methods for parametric LQ problems--A survey , 1987 .

[32]  William R. Saunders,et al.  Adaptive Structures: Dynamics and Control , 1998 .

[33]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[34]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Constant and switching gains in semi-active damping of vibrating structures , 2012, Int. J. Control.

[35]  Wen-Fang Xie,et al.  H ∞ robust control of semi-active Macpherson suspension system: new applied design , 2010 .

[36]  H. Toivonen A globally convergent algorithm for the optimal constant output feedback problem , 1985 .

[37]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Vibration Control Using Semi-Active Force Generators , 1974 .