Relations between students' approaches to learning, experienced emotions and outcomes of learning

Quantitative analyses conducted on the self-reports of first year university students suggest that there is a relationship between the ways they emotionally experience their course and the approach they take to the learning of that course. Students who more strongly experience positive emotions, such as hope and pride, and more weakly experience negative emotions (such as anger, boredom, anxiety and shame), are likely to be adopting more of a deep approach to learning. In comparison, students who describe more of a surface approach to learning are more likely to report an experience of lower positive emotions and higher negative emotions. Both the experience of more positive emotions and the adoption of a deeper approach are associated with higher achievement scores. Lower achievement is associated with surface approaches to learning and negative emotional experiences. The value of these results lies in enhancing awareness of the elements that make up the learning experience for students, and of the need for consideration of the full range of emotional and approach to learning elements in designing new learning environments.

[1]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Teaching for Understanding at University , 2009 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  J. Grégoire,et al.  Development and Construct Validation of an Academic Emotions Scale , 2008 .

[4]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[5]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ) , 2004 .

[6]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[7]  P. Ramsden.  A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire , 1991 .

[8]  P. Ramsden,et al.  The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire , 1997 .

[9]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  The university student experience of face-to-face and online discussions: coherence, reflection and meaning , 2007 .

[10]  Elizabeth Hazel,et al.  Variation in learning orchestration in university biology courses , 2002 .

[11]  Elizabeth Hazel,et al.  Students’ experiences of studying physics concepts: The effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches , 2000 .

[12]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[13]  K. Trigwell,et al.  RELATING APPROACHES TO STUDY AND QUALITY OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AT THE COURSE LEVEL , 1991 .

[14]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[15]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[16]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink,et al.  Achievement Goal Theory and Affect: An Asymmetrical Bidirectional Model , 2002 .

[17]  D. Hounsell.  The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[18]  R. Pekrun.  The impact of emotions on learning and achievement : towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators , 1992 .

[19]  Åge Diseth,et al.  Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement , 2003 .

[20]  Svein Larsen,et al.  Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement , 2006 .

[21]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[22]  Jackie Nicholas,et al.  University mathematics students' conceptions of mathematics , 1998 .

[23]  Michael Prosser,et al.  The “How” and “What” of learning physics , 1989 .

[24]  Jackie Nicholas,et al.  Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university , 1994 .

[25]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[26]  Alfred Joseph Lizzio,et al.  University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice , 2002 .

[27]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[28]  T. Seifert,et al.  Characteristics of ego- and task-oriented students: a comparison of two methodologies. , 1995, The British journal of educational psychology.

[29]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Universities into the 21st Century: Teaching for Understanding at University: Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking , 2009 .

[30]  P. Pintrich.  A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students , 2004 .

[31]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[32]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  The Importance of Students' Goals in Their Emotional Experience of Academic Failure: Investigating the Precursors and Consequences of Shame , 2002 .

[33]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Investigating the relationship between variations in students' perceptions of their academic environment and variations in study behaviour in distance education. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[34]  Debra K. Meyer,et al.  Discovering Emotion in Classroom Motivation Research , 2002 .

[35]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[36]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Improving the quality of student learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes , 1991 .

[37]  P. Salovey,et al.  Models of emotional intelligence , 2000 .

[38]  P. Pintrich.  A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[39]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education , 2002 .

[40]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .