Is the World Flat? : Unpacking the Geography of Crowd Capital

How does the geographic location of individual crowd members effect crowdsourcing participation and outcomes? How do variations in contest design effect crowdsourcing participation and outcomes by country and region? In this work we begin to answer these important questions by empirically testing the effects of geography and contest design on crowdsourcing participation and outcomes. Using data from a global creative crowdsourcing site, we utilize Crowd Capital Theory with data encompassing 1,858,202 observations from 28,214 crowd members on 94 different projects, to test our hypotheses based on the premise that the crowdsourcing is – much like the real world – not a flat one. Using multiple probit regressions to isolate the geographic effects, we find significant variation across countries and regions on crowdsourcing participation and outcomes, and further, significant effects of contest design on participation and outcomes by country and region. Our work makes new and useful contributions to the literature on crowdsourcing and creative competitions used for open innovation, ascertaining that the world is still not flat — even in case of tournaments on IT platforms with global reach. This is also the first work to empirically measure the distinct stages of resource creation from IT-mediated crowds; in doing so we validate Crowd Capital Theory as a model for resource creation from IT-mediated crowds.

[1]  J. Andrei Villarroel,et al.  INTRA-CORPORATE CROWDSOURCING (ICC): LEVERAGING UPON RANK AND SITE MARGINALITY FOR INNOVATION , 2010 .

[2]  Eric Schenk,et al.  Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices , 2011 .

[3]  Karim R Lakhani,et al.  Using the crowd as an innovation partner. , 2013, Harvard business review.

[4]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  The Power of Innomediation , 2003 .

[5]  K. Lakhani,et al.  The Principles of Distributed Innovation , 2007, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[6]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[7]  Oded Nov,et al.  Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Co-Creation: Toward a Taxonomy and an Integrated Research Perspective , 2010, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[10]  Thierry Burger-Helmchen,et al.  Crowdsourcing of inventive activities: definition and limits , 2011 .

[11]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Optimal Design of Crowdsourcing Contests , 2009, ICIS.

[12]  Yun Xu,et al.  The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[13]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[14]  P. Whitla,et al.  Crowdsourcing and its application in marketing activities , 2009 .

[15]  Yannig Roth,et al.  Crowdsourcing in the Production of Video Advertising: The Emerging Roles of Crowdsourcing Platforms , 2013 .

[16]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Jeff Howe,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2008, Human Resource Management International Digest.

[18]  Dahui Li,et al.  Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[19]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[20]  Richard D. Wang,et al.  Tournaments for Ideas , 2010 .

[21]  Aaron Delwiche,et al.  The Participatory Cultures Handbook , 2012 .

[22]  Christian Lüthje,et al.  Whom Should Firms Attract to Open Innovation Platforms? The Role of Knowledge Diversity and Motivation , 2011 .

[23]  Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara,et al.  Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Paul Belleflamme,et al.  Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Daren C. Brabham.  Crowdsourcing: A Model for Leveraging Online Communities , 2011 .

[26]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Using Open Innovation to Identify the Best Ideas , 2013 .

[27]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Collaboratively crowdsourcing workflows with turkomatic , 2012, CSCW.

[28]  Michael K. Reiter,et al.  Crowds: anonymity for Web transactions , 1998, TSEC.

[29]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[30]  Patrick Finnegan,et al.  'Orchestrating' sustainable crowdsourcing: A characterisation of solver brokerages , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Aaron Barlow,et al.  Blogging America: The New Public Sphere , 2007 .

[32]  Daren C. Brabham.  Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving , 2008 .

[33]  Pankaj Ghemawat,et al.  Global Integration ' Global Concentration , 2006 .

[34]  John Prpic,et al.  The Theory of Crowd Capital , 2012, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  Manuel Blum,et al.  reCAPTCHA: Human-Based Character Recognition via Web Security Measures , 2008, Science.

[36]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  A Theoretical Model of User Engagement in Crowdsourcing , 2013, CRIWG.

[37]  G. Sutton,et al.  Judging the Archon Genomics X PRIZE for whole human genome sequencing , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[38]  John Prpic,et al.  The Contours of Crowd Capability , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.