The Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) trial: clinical and angiographic profile at study entry.

BACKGROUND The optimal revascularization strategy for diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) remains uncertain for lack of an adequately powered, randomized trial. The FREEDOM trial was designed to compare contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with MVD against a background of optimal medical therapy. METHODS A total of 1,900 diabetic participants with MVD were randomized to PCI or CABG worldwide from April 2005 to March 2010. FREEDOM is a superiority trial with a mean follow-up of 4.37 years (minimum 2 years) and 80% power to detect a 27.0% relative reduction. We present the baseline characteristics of patients screened and randomized, and provide a comparison with other MVD trials involving diabetic patients. RESULTS The randomized cohort was 63.1 ± 9.1 years old and 29% female, with a median diabetes duration of 10.2 ± 8.9 years. Most (83%) had 3-vessel disease and on average took 5.5 ± 1.7 vascular medications, with 32% on insulin therapy. Nearly all had hypertension and/or dyslipidemia, and 26% had a prior myocardial infarction. Mean hemoglobin A1c was 7.8 ± 1.7 mg/dL, 29% had low-density lipoprotein <70 mg/dL, and mean systolic blood pressure was 134 ± 20 mm Hg. The mean SYNTAX score was 26.2 with a symmetric distribution. FREEDOM trial participants have baseline characteristics similar to those of contemporary multivessel and diabetes trial cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The FREEDOM trial has successfully recruited a high-risk diabetic MVD cohort. Follow-up efforts include aggressive monitoring to optimize background risk factor control. FREEDOM will contribute significantly to the PCI versus CABG debate in diabetic patients with MVD.

[1]  R. A. Johnson,et al.  Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. , 1985, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Nashef,et al.  The logistic EuroSCORE , 2003 .

[3]  R. Califf,et al.  Relationship between diabetes mellitus and long-term survival after coronary bypass and angioplasty. , 1997, Circulation.

[4]  V. Fuster,et al.  Optimal treatment of the diabetic patient with multivessel disease , 2008, Current cardiology reports.

[5]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  G. Stone,et al.  SYNTAX Score Reproducibility and Variability Between Interventional Cardiologists, Core Laboratory Technicians, and Quantitative Coronary Measurements , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  I. Palacios,et al.  Five-year follow-up of the Argentine randomized trial of coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI II). , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  James T. Willerson,et al.  Appointment of New Associate Editor for Circulation , 1996 .

[9]  G. Angelini,et al.  Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Mitchell W. Krucoff,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial. Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, th , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  W. Howard,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease , 2008 .

[14]  P. Lemos,et al.  Coronary Revascularization (Surgical or Percutaneous) Decreases Mortality After the First Year in Diabetic Subjects but not in Nondiabetic Subjects With Multivessel Disease: An Analysis From the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II) , 2006, Circulation.

[15]  F. Welt,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial. Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, th , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  R. Frye,et al.  Baseline coronary angiographic findings in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial (BARI 2D). , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  Sheng-Chia Chung,et al.  Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease Enrolled in the BARI 2D Trial , 2008 .

[18]  Ameet Bakhai,et al.  Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[19]  R. Bonow,et al.  The diabetes epidemic: a national and global crisis. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[20]  J. Spertus,et al.  Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  Sheng-Chia Chung,et al.  Baseline characteristics of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease enrolled in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial. , 2008, American heart journal.

[22]  R A Deyo,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. , 2011, European heart journal.

[24]  Robert L. Frye,et al.  Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  EuroPCR EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005 .

[26]  V. Fuster,et al.  Design of the Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) Trial. , 2008, American heart journal.