ePatients on YouTube: Analysis of Four Experiences From the Patients' Perspective

Background Many patients share their personal experiences and opinions using online video platforms. These videos are watched by millions of health consumers and health care professionals. Although it has become a popular phenomenon, little is known about patients who share videos online and why they do so. Objective We aimed to explore the motivations and challenges faced by patients who share videos about their health and experiences on YouTube. As part of a conference discussion, we asked several patients actively engaged on YouTube to make a video explaining their motivations. This paper discusses these videos. Methods In this qualitative study, we performed an analysis of the videos created by 4 patients about their self-reported motivations and challenges they face as YouTube users. First, two judges compared the transcriptions and decided the exact wording when confusing content was found. Second, two judges categorized the content of the videos to identify the major themes. Results Four main categories emerged: (1) the origin or cause for making the first video, (2) the objectives that they achieve by continuing to make videos, (3) the perception of community, and (4) the negative consequences of the experience. Conclusions The main reason for making videos was to bridge the gap between traditional health information about their diseases and everyday life. The first consequence of sharing their life on YouTube was a loss of privacy. However, they also experienced the positive effects of expressing their feelings, being part of a large community of peers, and helping others to deal with a chronic condition.

[1]  W. Chou,et al.  Social Media Use in the United States: Implications for Health Communication , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  Ruta K Valaitis,et al.  Computers and the Internet: Tools for Youth Empowerment , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  C. V. van Uden-Kraan,et al.  Patient-initiated online support groups: motives for initiation, extent of success and success factors , 2010, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  R. Charon,et al.  Narrative and medicine. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Frost,et al.  Sharing Health Data for Better Outcomes on PatientsLikeMe , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Diana Gosálvez Prados,et al.  Society for Participatory Medicine , 2011 .

[7]  M Soledad Cepeda,et al.  Emotional disclosure through patient narrative may improve pain and well-being: results of a randomized controlled trial in patients with cancer pain. , 2008, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[8]  John B. Horrigan,et al.  Pew Internet & American Life Project , 2002 .

[9]  G. Eysenbach Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  Provider‐sponsored virtual communities for chronic patients: improving health outcomes through organizational patient‐centred knowledge management , 2003, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  Paul J. Ambrose,et al.  Neo-tribes: the power and potential of online communities in health care , 2006, CACM.

[12]  Cécile Paris,et al.  Talking about your health to strangers: understanding the use of online social networks by patients , 2010, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[13]  J. Kahn,et al.  Emotional self-disclosure and emotional avoidance: Relations with symptoms of depression and anxiety. , 2009 .

[14]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  From Intermediation to Disintermediation and Apomediation: New Models for Consumers to Access and Assess the Credibility of Health Information in the Age of Web2.0 , 2007, MedInfo.

[15]  E. Augustson,et al.  Cancer Survivorship in the Age of YouTube and Social Media: A Narrative Analysis , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  N. Christakis,et al.  Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.