Small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro evaluation of in-stent stenoses using CT angiography

Our aim was to determine whether CT angiography is suitable for the evaluation of in-stent restenoses in small vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty. Therefore, we simulated stenoses with degrees of 25, 50, 75 and 90% in a total of 12 stents with different designs (MEDTRONIC AVE; ABBOT BioDivYsio, GUIDANT Neurolink, TERUMO Tsunami, COOK V-Flex Plus) and sizes (3.0 mm, 4.0 mm). For each stenosis, the apparent stenotic degree (ASD) was measured by CT angiography. Subjective (viewing at the CT images) and objective (acquisition of a density profile) evaluations were made after the stents were filled with a solution of 0.9% NaCl and with a diluted contrast medium. It was not possible to visualize the patent lumen in any of the stenotic stent segments by viewing at the CT images. After objective evaluation, the degree of the stenoses was generally overestimated. In the group with the 3.0-mm stents, ASD ranged from 73.6 to 100% in 25% degree stenoses. With the exception of one stent, stenoses with a degree of more than 25% appeared as vessel obstruction (ASD =100%) in the 3.0-mm group. In the 4.0-mm group, the mean ASD was 60% for 25% degree stenoses, 76% for 50% degree stenoses, 91% for 75% degree stenoses and 96% for 95% degree stenoses. The minimum diameter of stents for differentiation between in-stent restenosis and vessel occlusion using CT angiography is 4.0 mm. In CT angiography, the degrees of in-stent stenoses are generally overestimated. The evaluation of in-stent restenoses only seems to be possible when CT angiographic images before and after contrast application are evaluated objectively by density profiles.

[1]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. , 2003, Radiology.

[2]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  M. Völk,et al.  Appearance of Vascular Stents in Computed Tomographic Angiography: In Vitro Examination of 14 Different Stent Types , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[4]  R. Erbel,et al.  Quantitative analysis of elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty and after intracoronary implantation of balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stents. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  K. Sartor,et al.  Differentiation of white, mixed, and red thrombi: value of CT in estimation of the prognosis of thrombolysis phantom study. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  Walter Heindel,et al.  Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation , 2003, European Radiology.

[7]  M. Koltzenburg,et al.  Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study , 1999, The Lancet.

[8]  J R Waugh,et al.  Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. , 1992, Radiology.

[9]  K. Robinson,et al.  Coronary intimal proliferation after balloon injury and stenting in swine: an animal model of restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  U. Grzyska,et al.  Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[11]  P. Libby,et al.  Cytokines and growth factors positively and negatively regulate interstitial collagen gene expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells. , 1991, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.