States on Steroids: The Intergovernmental Odyssey of American Climate Policy

Climate change has conventionally been framed as an issue that would be addressed by an international regime established through negotiation among nation-states. The experience of policy development in the decade following the signing of the Kyoto Protocol indicates that climate change also needs to be examined as a challenge of multilevel governance. The increasingly central role of state governments in American climate policy formation squares with recent experience in other Western democracies that share authority across governmental levels. This paper examines the American experience, considering factors that have contributed to a state-centric policy process and using that body of experience to assess competing strategic choices faced by individual states based on their mix of emission trends and policy adoption rates. In turn, the collective state experience allows for consideration of the varied political feasibility of competing climate policy tools that remain under active review in subnational, national, and international contexts. The paper concludes with a set of scenarios that explore different ways in which a state-centric system may be integrated with expanding involvement at the national level.

[1]  J. Zimmerman.  Congressional Preemption During the George W. Bush Administration , 2007 .

[2]  L. Ross,et al.  Environmental policy in China , 1988 .

[3]  R. Repetto,et al.  Punctuated Equilibrium and the Dynamics of U.S. Environmental Policy , 2006 .

[4]  Charles O. Jones,et al.  Clean Air: The Policies and Politics of Pollution Control. , 1975 .

[5]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Renewables Portfolio Standards: A Comparative Analysis of State-Level Policy Impact Projections , 2007 .

[6]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  The Cost of Climate Policy , 2002 .

[7]  Denise Scheberle,et al.  Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation , 1997 .

[8]  Timothy J. Conlan,et al.  Federalism, the Bush Administration, and the Transformation of American Conservatism , 2007 .

[9]  Cliff Chen,et al.  Weighing the costs and benefits of state renewables portfolio standards in the United States: A comparative analysis of state-level policy impact projections , 2009 .

[10]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  For workshop on Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post Kyoto World , 2006 .

[11]  Daniel J. Fiorino.  The New Environmental Regulation , 2006 .

[12]  Barry G. Rabe,et al.  Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy , 2004 .

[13]  Reuben G. Gustavson,et al.  Resources for the Future, Annual Report , 1959 .

[14]  Christine Yoshinaga-Itano,et al.  State of the States , 1998 .

[15]  J. Wiener,et al.  Reconstructing Climate Policy , 2003 .

[16]  D. Vogel.  Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[17]  B. Rabe.  Environmental Policy and the Bush Era: The Collision Between the Administrative Presidency and State Experimentation , 2007 .

[18]  Mark Roseland,et al.  Toward Sustainable Communities: Resources for Citizens and Their Governments , 1992 .

[19]  S. Kamieniecki.  Corporate America and Environmental Policy: How Often Does Business Get Its Way? , 2006 .

[20]  Thomas E. Mann,et al.  The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track , 2006 .

[21]  Paul Manna.  School's In: Federalism and the National Education Agenda , 2006 .

[22]  S. Kamieniecki.  Misplaced Distrust: Policy Networks and the Environment in France, the United States, and Canada , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[23]  Stacy D. Vandeveer,et al.  Political Science and Prediction: What's Next for U.S. Climate Change Policy? , 2007 .

[24]  Jay Apt,et al.  Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy? , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Ian H. Rowlands,et al.  The Development of Renewable Electricity Policy in the Province of Ontario: The Influence of Ideas and Timing , 2007 .

[26]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation , 2008 .

[27]  Richard N. Cooper,et al.  Trading up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy , 1995 .

[28]  Kathryn Hoberg Arehart,et al.  State of the States: The Status of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening, Assessment, and Intervention Systems in 16 States. , 1998, American journal of audiology.

[29]  Paul L. Posner.  The Politics of Preemption: Prospects for the States , 2005, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[30]  J. Dernbach.  Stabilizing and then Reducing U.S. Energy Consumption: Legal and Policy Tools for Efficiency and Conservation , 2007 .

[31]  Regulation in the States , 2004 .

[32]  P. S. Nivola.  Tense Commandments: Federal Prescriptions and City Problems , 2002 .

[33]  T. Dinan.  Trade-offs in Allocating Allowances for CO2 Emissions , 2007 .