A Pumilio-induced RNA structure switch in p27-3′ UTR controls miR-221 and miR-222 accessibility

Key regulators of 3′ untranslated regions (3′ UTRs) are microRNAs and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). The p27 tumour suppressor is highly expressed in quiescent cells, and its downregulation is required for cell cycle entry after growth factor stimulation. Intriguingly, p27 accumulates in quiescent cells despite high levels of its inhibitors miR-221 and miR-222 (Refs 5, 6). Here we show that miR-221 and miR-222 are underactive towards p27-3′ UTR in quiescent cells, as a result of target site hindrance. Pumilio-1 (PUM1) is a ubiquitously expressed RBP that was shown to interact with p27-3′ UTR. In response to growth factor stimulation, PUM1 is upregulated and phosphorylated for optimal induction of its RNA-binding activity towards the p27-3′ UTR. PUM1 binding induces a local change in RNA structure that favours association with miR-221 and miR-222, efficient suppression of p27 expression, and rapid entry to the cell cycle. We have therefore uncovered a novel RBP-induced structural switch modulating microRNA-mediated gene expression regulation.

[1]  Hermann Bondi,et al.  The good, the bad and the ugly , 1988, Nature.

[2]  L. Hengst,et al.  Translational Control of p27Kip1 Accumulation During the Cell Cycle , 1996, Science.

[3]  James M. Roberts,et al.  The murine gene p27Kip1 is haplo-insufficient for tumour suppression , 1998, Nature.

[4]  Tom H. Pringle,et al.  The human genome browser at UCSC. , 2002, Genome research.

[5]  R. Bernards,et al.  Stable suppression of tumorigenicity by virus-mediated RNA interference. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[6]  P. Manow.  ‚The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly‘ , 2002 .

[7]  Ivo L. Hofacker,et al.  Vienna RNA secondary structure server , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Randal J. Kaufman,et al.  Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  Reuven Agami,et al.  p53-Dependent Regulation of Cdc6 Protein Stability Controls Cellular Proliferation , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[10]  W. Filipowicz,et al.  Inhibition of Translational Initiation by Let-7 MicroRNA in Human Cells , 2005, Science.

[11]  Anthony K. L. Leung,et al.  Quantitative analysis of Argonaute protein reveals microRNA-dependent localization to stress granules , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Plasterk,et al.  The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[13]  M. Mann,et al.  Global, In Vivo, and Site-Specific Phosphorylation Dynamics in Signaling Networks , 2006, Cell.

[14]  Reuven Agami,et al.  A genetic screen implicates miRNA-372 and miRNA-373 as oncogenes in testicular germ cell tumors. , 2006, Cell.

[15]  Reuven Agami,et al.  Regulation of the p27Kip1 tumor suppressor by miR‐221 and miR‐222 promotes cancer cell proliferation , 2007 .

[16]  R. Agami,et al.  Classifying microRNAs in cancer: the good, the bad and the ugly. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  Reuven Agami,et al.  RNA-Binding Protein Dnd1 Inhibits MicroRNA Access to Target mRNA , 2007, Cell.

[18]  F. Slack,et al.  The Caenorhabditis elegans pumilio homolog, puf-9, is required for the 3'UTR-mediated repression of the let-7 microRNA target gene, hbl-1. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[19]  M. Mann,et al.  PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites , 2007, Genome Biology.

[20]  Jeffrey E. Thatcher,et al.  Dysregulation of microRNAs after myocardial infarction reveals a role of miR-29 in cardiac fibrosis , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  W. Filipowicz,et al.  Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  R. Agami,et al.  Interplay between microRNAs and RNA-binding proteins determines developmental processes , 2008, Cell cycle.

[23]  Ludger Hengst,et al.  The Cdk inhibitor p27 in human cancer: prognostic potential and relevance to anticancer therapy , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[24]  N. Mukherjee,et al.  Ribonomic Analysis of Human Pum1 Reveals cis-trans Conservation across Species despite Evolution of Diverse mRNA Target Sets , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  S. K. Zaidi,et al.  MicroRNAs 221 and 222 bypass quiescence and compromise cell survival. , 2008, Cancer research.

[26]  O. Kent,et al.  Functional integration of microRNAs into oncogenic and tumor suppressor pathways , 2008, Cell cycle.

[27]  Mihaela Zavolan,et al.  Comparative Analysis of mRNA Targets for Human PUF-Family Proteins Suggests Extensive Interaction with the miRNA Regulatory System , 2008, PloS one.