Compliant structures-based wing and wingtip morphing devices

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the design and experimental work of compliant wing and wingtip morphing devices conducted within the EU FP7 project NOVEMOR and to demonstrate that the optimization tools developed can be used to synthesize compliant morphing devices. Design/methodology/approach The compliant morphing devices were “designed-through-optimization”, with the optimization algorithms including Simplex optimization for composite compliant skin design, aerodynamic shape optimization able to take into account the structural behaviour of the morphing skin, continuum-based and load path representation topology optimization methods and multi-objective optimization coupled with genetic algorithm for compliant internal substructure design. Low-speed subsonic wind tunnel testing was performed as an effective means of demonstrating proof-of-concept. Findings It was found that the optimization tools could be successfully implemented in the manufacture and testing stage. Preliminary insight into the performance of the compliant structure has been made during the first wind tunnel tests. Practical implications The tools in this work further the development of morphing structures, which when implemented in aircraft have potential implications to environmentally friendlier aircrafts. Originality/value The key innovations in this paper include the development of a composite skin optimization tool for the design of highly 3D morphing wings and its ensuing manufacture process; the development of a continuum-based topology optimization tool for shape control design of compliant mechanisms considering the stiffness and displacement functions; the use of a superelastic material for the compliant mechanism; and wind tunnel validation of morphing wing devices based on compliant structure technology.

[1]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[2]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[3]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Morphing Aircraft Systems: Historical Perspectives and Future Challenges , 2013 .

[4]  Egon Stanewsky,et al.  Aerodynamic benefits of adaptive wing technology , 2000 .

[5]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Topological Optimization of Compliant Adaptive Wing Structure , 2009 .

[6]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[7]  G.A.A. Thuwis,et al.  Stiffness and Layout Tailoring of a Morphing High-lift System with Aeroelastic Loads , 2012 .

[8]  Shaker A. Meguid,et al.  Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges , 2010 .

[9]  S. Kota,et al.  An Effective Method of Synthesizing Compliant Adaptive Structures using Load Path Representation , 2005 .

[10]  Liyong Tong,et al.  Shape morphing of laminated composite structures with photostrictive actuators via topology optimization , 2011 .

[11]  P. Mantegazza,et al.  Multibody Implementation of Finite Volume C-0 Beams , 2000 .

[12]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topology synthesis of large‐displacement compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[13]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  DESIGN OF A SMART LEADING EDGE DEVICE FOR LOW SPEED WIND TUNNEL TESTS IN THE EUROPEAN PROJECT SADE , 2011 .

[14]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  A Process Chain for Structural Optimization of a Smart Droop Nose for an Active Blown High Lift System , 2014 .

[15]  M. Bendsøe Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem , 1989 .

[16]  B. Kulfan Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method , 2008 .

[17]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  A Two Levels Approach for the Optimal Design of Morphing Airfoils , 2010 .

[18]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[19]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Integrated Multidisciplinary Topology Optimization Approach to Adaptive Wing Design , 2006 .

[20]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  Application of the active camber morphing concept based on compliant structures to a regional aircraft , 2014, Smart Structures.

[21]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Realization of Morphing Wings: A Multidisciplinary Challenge , 2012 .

[22]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  A Two-Level Approach for the Optimal Design of Morphing Wings Based On Compliant Structures , 2011 .

[23]  M. Zhou,et al.  The COC algorithm, Part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization , 1991 .

[24]  H. P. Mlejnek,et al.  Some aspects of the genesis of structures , 1992 .

[25]  Z. Kang,et al.  Integrated Optimization of Material Layout and Control Voltage for Piezoelectric Laminated Plates , 2008 .