Multi-level analysis framework for reviewing IDT-based studies

Abstract Researchers have for years emphasized the value of multi-level studies. This research attempts to develop a framework for analyzing IT adoption studies from a multi-level perspective. Specifically, it examines research involving Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), using a framework devised on the multi-level analysis guidelines proposed by two studies. Four empirical IDT-based research papers are reviewed by applying the developed multi-level analysis framework. In doing so, this paper finds that by following the proposed framework, researchers can avoid the weakness of level bias caused by single-level analysis. In addition, the framework provides insights for managerial strategies in successful information system implementation, adoption and diffusion. Finally, the proposed framework can be referenced by future researchers for conducting multi-level analysis on IT adoption-related topics.

[1]  C. Annique Un,et al.  An empirical multi-level analysis for achieving balance between incremental and radical innovations , 2010 .

[2]  G. Tarde.  The Laws of Imitation , 2009 .

[3]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[4]  Helena Karsten,et al.  Constructing Interdependencies with Collaborative Information Technology , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[5]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[6]  M. Harris,et al.  Allocation of Decision-Making Authority , 2005 .

[7]  Arthur D. Shulman,et al.  Missing Organizational Linkages: Tools for Cross-Level Research , 2000 .

[8]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[9]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[10]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[11]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Innovation Diffusion Theory as a Predictor of Adoption Intention for Financial EDI , 1995, ICIS.

[12]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[13]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[14]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  D. Loriaux,et al.  The evolution of societies , 1991 .

[16]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[17]  Tae Hyoung Kwon,et al.  A Diffusion of Innovation Approach to MIS Infusion: Conceptualization, Methodology, and Management Strategies , 1990, ICIS.

[18]  Dorothy Leon Ard-Barton.  Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations , 1988 .

[19]  Leslie D. Ball,et al.  Identifying early adopters of large software systems , 1987, DATB.

[20]  E. Chatman.  Diffusion theory: A review and test of a conceptual model in information diffusion , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[21]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[22]  M. Fennell,et al.  Synergy, influence, and information in the adoption of administrative innovations. , 1984, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[23]  Donald C. Pelz,et al.  Use of Information Channels in Urban Innovations , 1983 .

[24]  R. Zmud.  Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[25]  Margrethe H. Olson,et al.  New Information Technology and Organizational Culture , 1982, MIS Q..

[26]  G. O'Mara,et al.  Farm size and the diffusion of green revolution technology ; On information and innovation diffusion : a bayesian approach , 1982 .

[27]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[28]  T. Barnett.  WHY ARE BUREAUCRATS SLOW ADOPTERS? THE CASE OF WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE GEZIRA SCHEME , 1979 .

[29]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[30]  R. Daft.  A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[31]  M. Moch,et al.  Size, Centralization and Organizational Adoption of Innovations , 1977 .

[32]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  The evolution of societies , 1977 .

[33]  F. Glen.  The social psychology of organizations , 1976 .

[34]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[35]  M. Aiken,et al.  Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. , 1967 .

[36]  H. G. Barnett,et al.  Innovation: The Basis of Cultural Change , 1963 .

[37]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[38]  R. Brooks,et al.  “Word-of-Mouth” Advertising in Selling New Products , 1957 .