Linking Routines to Operations Capabilities: A New Perspective

A typical approach to studying capabilities in the operations management literature is to assess the intended or realized competitive operational performance and their contribution to business and organizational objectives. While it is crucial to identify the operational performance that helps create competitive advantage, it is equally important to understand the means for delivering the needed performance at the operational level. Drawing on the resource-based view (RBV), we argue that routines are a critical source of operations capabilities and subsequently investigate operations capabilities by means of their underlying routines. Because a common problem to studying capabilities is the ambiguous and confusing definitions, we conduct an extensive literature review to address the semantic confusion among various definitions of capabilities and delineate it from other related terms. We identify improvement and innovation as two critical plant level capabilities, each consisting of a bundle of interrelated yet distinct routines. We then empirically measure the two capabilities as second-order latent variables and estimate their effects on a set of operational performance measures. The results suggest that routines form internally consistent bundles which are significantly related to operational performance. This supports our notion of “capabilities as routine bundles” that are difficult to imitate and thus a source of competitive advantage.

[1]  E. James Flynn,et al.  World class manufacturing: an investigation of Hayes and Wheelwright's foundation , 1999 .

[2]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[3]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  COMPETITIVE PRIORITIES: INVESTIGATING THE NEED FOR TRADE‐OFFS IN OPERATIONS STRATEGY , 2002 .

[4]  Larry P. Ritzman,et al.  REVISITING ALTERNATIVE THEORETICAL PARADIGMS IN MANUFACTURING STRATEGY , 2000 .

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[6]  Rohit Verma,et al.  MULTIPLE RATERS IN SURVEY‐BASED OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND TUTORIAL , 2000 .

[7]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Trade-offs? What Trade-offs? Competence and Competitiveness in Manufacturing Strategy , 1993 .

[8]  John Bessant,et al.  Developing strategic continuous improvement capability , 1999 .

[9]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[10]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  Shekhar Jayanthi,et al.  Innovation implementation in high technology manufacturing: A chaos-theoretic empirical analysis , 1998 .

[12]  S. Vickery,et al.  Production Competence and Business Strategy: Do They Affect Business Performance? , 1993 .

[13]  Emilios Avgouleas The Handbook of Technology Management , 2009 .

[14]  B. Chakravarthy Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[15]  G. Pisano,et al.  Beyond World-Class : The New Manufacturing Strategy , 1994 .

[16]  R. Pouder,et al.  Change drivers in the new millennium: implications for manufacturing strategy research , 2001 .

[17]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[18]  S. D. Amundson Relationships between theory-driven empirical research in operations management and other disciplines , 1998 .

[19]  S. Sitkin,et al.  DISTINGUISHING CONTROL FROM LEARNING IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[20]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[21]  R. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[22]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[23]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Configurations of Manufacturing Strategy, Business Strategy, Environment and Structure , 1996 .

[24]  Peter S. Pande,et al.  The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance , 2000 .

[25]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[26]  Manus Rungtusanatham,et al.  Beyond improved quality: the motivational effects of statistical process control , 2001 .

[27]  Robert A. Burgelman Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in , 2002 .

[28]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance , 2001 .

[29]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings , 1998 .

[30]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[31]  Henry Mintzberg Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[32]  Christoph Zott,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDY , 2003 .

[33]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[34]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[35]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[36]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From Continuous Improvement to Continuous Innovation , 2001 .

[37]  G. Johnson,et al.  Ceos' cognitive maps and the scope of the organization , 1994 .

[38]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[39]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction? , 2004 .

[40]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[41]  Hemant K. Jain,et al.  Success of Data Resource Management in Distributed Environments: An Empirical Investigation , 1998, MIS Q..

[42]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[43]  M. Noble,et al.  Manufacturing Strategy: Testing the Cumulative Model in a Multiple Country Context* , 1995 .

[44]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Learning the Innovation Journey: Order out of Chaos? , 1996 .

[45]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[46]  J. Ettlie Product-process development integration in manufacturing , 1995 .

[47]  M. Tushman,et al.  Readings in the Management of Innovation , 1988 .

[48]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[49]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities , 2004 .

[50]  J. Hulland,et al.  Redeployment of Brands, Sales Forces, and General Marketing Management Expertise following Horizontal Acquisitions: A Resource-Based View , 1999 .

[51]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[52]  David B. Montgomery,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Firm Performance: The Case of Small Manufacturing Firms in Japan , 2004 .

[53]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[55]  A. Meyer,et al.  Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory , 1990 .

[56]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[57]  E. James Flynn,et al.  World‐class manufacturing project: overview and selected results , 1997 .

[58]  H. Volberda,et al.  Exploring Exploration Orientation and its Determinants: Some Empirical Evidence , 2004 .

[59]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The impact of just-in-time manufacturing and its infrastructure on manufacturing performance , 1997 .

[61]  Mikko A. Junttila,et al.  A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance , 2002 .

[62]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[63]  Ke-Hai Yuan,et al.  On Averaging Variables in a Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model , 1997 .

[64]  Cecil C. Bozarth,et al.  The impact of market requirements focus and manufacturing characteristics focus on plant performance , 1997 .

[65]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[66]  Gary D. Scudder,et al.  Innovation in manufacturing , 1989 .

[67]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  COMPETING THROUGH MANUFACTURING AND THE NEW MANUFACTURING PARADIGM: IS MANUFACTURING STRATEGY PASSE? , 1996 .

[68]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  Rita Gunther McGrath Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[70]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[71]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[72]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[73]  M. Porter What is strategy , 2000 .

[74]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Manufacturing practices, strategic fit and performance: A routine‐based view , 2004 .

[75]  Paul C. Godfrey,et al.  THE PROBLEM OF UNOBSERVABLES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[76]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Towards a Theory of Competitive Progression: Evidence from High‐Tech Manufacturing , 2004 .

[77]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[78]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[79]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[80]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[81]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Strategic, structural contingency and institutional explanations in the adoption of innovative manufacturing practices , 2004 .

[82]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance , 2003 .

[83]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[84]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[85]  C. McDermott,et al.  An exploratory analysis of new competencies: a resource based view perspective , 2002 .

[86]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[87]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[88]  A. Madhok COST, VALUE AND FOREIGN MARKET ENTRY MODE: THE TRANSACTION AND THE FIRM , 1997 .

[89]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A Theory of Production Competence , 1989 .

[90]  Gregory P. White A meta‐analysis model of manufacturing capabilities , 1996 .

[91]  Jayanth Jayaram,et al.  An empirical examination of quality tool deployment patterns and their impact on performance , 1999 .

[92]  S. Winter Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[93]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[94]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward ☆ , 2006 .

[95]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[96]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[97]  John K. McCreery,et al.  Competitive Priorities in Operations Management , 1998 .

[98]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[99]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[100]  E. L. Nichols,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AS A STRATEGIC RESOURCE IN SUPPLY MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[101]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[102]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[103]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[104]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[105]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Relevance of Baldrige constructs in an international context: A study of national culture , 2006 .

[106]  Lawrence M. Corbett,et al.  Key manufacturing capability elements and business performance , 2002 .

[107]  John N. Pearson,et al.  Strategically managed buyer–supplier relationships and performance outcomes , 1999 .

[108]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. , 1990 .

[109]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Core manufacturing capabilities and their links to product differentiation , 1998 .

[110]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing , 1984 .

[111]  Ravi Kathuria Competitive priorities and managerial performance: a taxonomy of small manufacturers , 2000 .

[112]  Greco Rb,et al.  From the classroom to the corner office. , 1992 .

[113]  J. Barney Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[114]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[115]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Competing for Advantage , 2003 .

[116]  Robert E. Markland,et al.  STRATEGIC PRODUCTION COMPETENCE: CONVERGENT, DISCRIMINANT, AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITY , 2009 .