Globalization in the Computer Industry: Implications of the Asian Production Network for the U.S. - eScholarship

ISR Paper based on book GLOBALIZATION IN THE COMPUTER INDUSTRY: IMPLICATIONS OF THE ASIAN PRODUCTION NETWORK FOR THE U.S Kenneth L. Kraemer and Jason Dedrick Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine INTRODUCTION The computer industry has been dominated throughout its history by U.S. companies that have developed most of the important innovations, set key technical standards, and still produce over two-thirds of the world's hardware, software and services. Periodic technology shifts such as the introduction of the minicomputer and personal computer have changed the structure of the industry, but in each case it was American companies who were the industry leaders. Despite the continuing leadership of U.S. companies, the actual production of computer equipment has shifted steadily away from the U.S., mostly to countries in the Asia-Pacific region. While U.S.-based companies still account for 65% of the world's computer hardware sales, the percent of the world's computer hardware produced in North America declined steadily, from 50% in 1985 to 28% in 1995. Meanwhile, the share produced in Asia grew from 23% to 47%, virtually replacing the U.S. production (Figure 1). This development is mainly the result of U.S. companies having organized complex global production networks, and Asian countries finding opportunities to participate in those networks. Figure 1. Company vs. country position in the computer industry World computer sales by location of vendor's headquarters World computer production by location of production % of world hardware production by location ROW Europe Asia N. America Europe Asia N. America Sources: McKinsey & Company, Inc., The 1996 Report on the Computer Industry (New York, NY: McKinsey & Company, Inc., 1996). Source: Elsevier, Yearbook of World Electronics Data (Elsevier Advanced Technology, various years). The rapid globalization of the computer industry has raised concerns that the U.S. was at risk of losing its industry leadership. Former U.S. Trade Representative Clyde Prestowitz predicted in 1989 that the Japanese would take over the computer industry as they had with televisions and other electronics products (Business Week, 1989). The next year, Intel CEO

[1]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[2]  David C. Moschella Waves of Power: The Dynamics of Global Technology Leadership, 1964-2010 , 1997 .

[3]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta , 1992, Business History Review.

[4]  Chalmers A. Johnson,et al.  MITI and the Japanese Miracle , 1982 .

[5]  C R Morris,et al.  How architecture wins technology wars. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[6]  A. Amsden Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization , 1991 .

[7]  A. Marshall,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1891 .

[8]  Michael Borrus,et al.  Left for Dead: Asian Production Networks and the Revival of US Electronics , 1997 .

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Supporting the Free Market: Information Technology Policy in Hong Kong , 1994, Inf. Soc..

[10]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Carriers of Regionalization: The East Asian Production Networks of Japanese Electronics Firms , 1994 .

[11]  M. Anchordoguy,et al.  Computers, Inc: Japan's Challenge to IBM , 1989 .

[12]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Payoffs from Investment in Information Technology: Lessons from the Asia-Pacific Region , 1994 .

[13]  R. Wade Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization , 1991 .

[14]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  From Nationalism to Pragmatism: IT Policy in China , 1995, Computer.

[15]  James M. Buchanan,et al.  The return to increasing returns , 1994 .

[16]  W. Diebold,et al.  Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization , 1990 .

[17]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[18]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Flexibility, and Policy Coordination: Taiwan's Computer Industry , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[19]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  National Technology Policy and Computer Production in Asia-Pacific Countries , 1995, Inf. Soc..

[20]  M. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[21]  Patrick Clawson,et al.  The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy: By the World Bank. (New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank, 1993. 389 pp. $19.95, paper.) , 1995 .

[22]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing returns and the new world of business. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[23]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Competing through Standards: DOS/V and Japan's PC Market , 1996 .

[24]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[25]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[26]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Korean Technology Policy at a Crossroads: The Case of Computers , 1995 .

[28]  西口 清勝,et al.  The East Asian Miracle--Economic Growth and Public Policy/World Bank(1993) , 1993 .

[29]  Allyn A. Young,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS , 1928 .