A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE

Several imaging modalities, including T1-weighted structural imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI can show chronological age related changes. Employing machine learning algorithms, an individual's imaging data can predict their age with reasonable accuracy. While details vary according to modality, the general strategy is to: (1) extract image-related features, (2) build a model on a training set that uses those features to predict an individual's age, (3) validate the model on a test dataset, producing a predicted age for each individual, (4) define the “Brain Age Gap Estimate” (BrainAGE) as the difference between an individual's predicted age and his/her chronological age, (5) estimate the relationship between BrainAGE and other variables of interest, and (6) make inferences about those variables and accelerated or delayed brain aging. For example, a group of individuals with overall positive BrainAGE may show signs of accelerated aging in other variables as well. There is inevitably an overestimation of the age of younger individuals and an underestimation of the age of older individuals due to “regression to the mean.” The correlation between chronological age and BrainAGE may significantly impact the relationship between BrainAGE and other variables of interest when they are also related to age. In this study, we examine the detectability of variable effects under different assumptions. We use empirical results from two separate datasets [training = 475 healthy volunteers, aged 18–60 years (259 female); testing = 489 participants including people with mood/anxiety, substance use, eating disorders and healthy controls, aged 18–56 years (312 female)] to inform simulation parameter selection. Outcomes in simulated and empirical data strongly support the proposal that models incorporating BrainAGE should include chronological age as a covariate. We propose either including age as a covariate in step 5 of the above framework, or employing a multistep procedure where age is regressed on BrainAGE prior to step 5, producing BrainAGE Residualized (BrainAGER) scores.

[1]  Christian Gaser,et al.  BrainAGE score indicates accelerated brain aging in schizophrenia, but not bipolar disorder , 2017, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[2]  J. Cole,et al.  Predicting Age Using Neuroimaging: Innovative Brain Ageing Biomarkers , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  A. Baghestani,et al.  How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis , 2012, Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench.

[4]  H. Völzke,et al.  Advanced brain aging: relationship with epidemiologic and genetic risk factors, and overlap with Alzheimer disease atrophy patterns , 2016, Translational Psychiatry.

[5]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  Brain age predicts mortality , 2017, Molecular Psychiatry.

[6]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Imaging patterns of brain development and their relationship to cognition. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Christian Gaser,et al.  The Effect of the APOE Genotype on Individual BrainAGE in Normal Aging, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s Disease , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Christian Wachinger,et al.  Gaussian process uncertainty in age estimation as a measure of brain abnormality , 2018, NeuroImage.

[9]  Lin Ma,et al.  Alterations of functional connectivities from early to middle adulthood: Clues from multivariate pattern analysis of resting-state fMRI data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[10]  F. Galton Regression Towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature. , 1886 .

[11]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Advanced BrainAGE in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2013, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[12]  Cong Jin,et al.  Predicting healthy older adult's brain age based on structural connectivity networks using artificial neural networks , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[13]  D. Sheehan,et al.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[14]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Estimating the age of healthy subjects from T1-weighted MRI scans using kernel methods: Exploring the influence of various parameters , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  L. Wilkins Increased brain-predicted aging in treated HIV disease , 2017, Neurology.

[16]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Support Vector Regression Machines , 1996, NIPS.

[17]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  BrainAGE in Mild Cognitive Impaired Patients: Predicting the Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  A. Dale,et al.  Critical ages in the life course of the adult brain: nonlinear subcortical aging , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.

[19]  Y. Stern,et al.  Differences between chronological and brain age are related to education and self-reported physical activity , 2016, Neurobiology of Aging.

[20]  Trang T. Le,et al.  Effect of Ibuprofen on BrainAGE: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Response Exploratory Study. , 2018, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[21]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment , 2016, NeuroImage.

[22]  A. D. Clayden CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS IN MEDICINE: A practical system for critical appraisal , 1989 .

[23]  M. Shammas Telomeres, lifestyle, cancer, and aging , 2011, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[24]  Robert Leech,et al.  Prediction of brain age suggests accelerated atrophy after traumatic brain injury , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[25]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Accelerated brain aging in schizophrenia and beyond: a neuroanatomical marker of psychiatric disorders. , 2014, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[26]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Predicting age across human lifespan based on structural connectivity from diffusion tensor imaging , 2014, 2014 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) Proceedings.

[27]  Joanna M. Wardlaw,et al.  Risk and protective factors for structural brain ageing in the eighth decade of life , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[28]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[29]  Jerzy Bodurka,et al.  Tulsa 1000: a naturalistic study protocol for multilevel assessment and outcome prediction in a large psychiatric sample , 2018, BMJ Open.