Effect of Graft Height Mismatch on Contact Pressures With Osteochondral Grafting of the Talus

Background: Osteochondral allograft transplantation is technically demanding. It is not always possible to place the surface of the graft perfectly flush with the surrounding cartilage. One must often choose between placing at least some portion of the surface of the graft slightly elevated or recessed. The effect of this choice on joint contact pressure is unknown. Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the effect of graft height mismatch on joint contact pressure in the ankle. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten human cadaveric ankles underwent osteochondral grafting by removal then replacement of an osteochondral plug. Six conditions were tested: intact, graft flush, graft elevated 1.0 mm, graft elevated 0.5 mm, graft recessed 0.5 mm, and graft recessed 1.0 mm. Joint contact pressures were measured with a Tekscan sensor while loads of 200 N, 400 N, 600 N, and 800 N were sequentially applied. Results: The peak contact pressure at the graft site for the flush condition was not significantly different from the intact condition for either medial or lateral lesions. In contrast, peak pressure on the opposite facet of the talar dome was significantly increased during the flush condition for the medial but not the lateral grafts. Elevated grafts experienced significantly increased contact pressures, whereas recessed grafts experienced significantly decreased pressures. These changes were greater for lateral than for medial lesions. Reciprocal changes in joint contact pressures were found on the opposite facet of the talus with elevated grafts on the lateral side and recessed grafts on the medial side. Conclusion: Flush graft placement can restore near-normal joint contact pressure. Elevated graft placement leads to significant increases in joint contact pressure at the graft site. Recessed graft placement leads to a transfer of pressure from the graft site to the opposite facet of the talus. Clinical Relevance: Osteochondral grafts in the talus should be placed flush if possible or else slightly recessed.

[1]  T. Hedman,et al.  The Effect of Fibular Malreduction on Contact Pressures in an Ankle Fracture Malunion Model* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  R. Al-Shaikh,et al.  Autologous Osteochondral Grafting for Talar Cartilage Defects , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  W. Herzog,et al.  Effects of inserting a pressensor film into articular joints on the actual contact mechanics. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  S. Raikin,et al.  Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Localization and Morphologic Data from 424 Patients Using a Novel Anatomical Grid Scheme , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[5]  S F Viegas,et al.  A Comprehensive Study of Pressure Distribution in the Ankle Joint with Inversion and Eversion , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  L. Hangody,et al.  Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Talus: Two to Seven Year Results in 36 Patients , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  P. Scranton,et al.  Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  E. Lautenschlager,et al.  The Effect of Angled Osteochondral Grafting on Contact Pressure , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  In vitro measurement of intraarticular pressure in the ankle joint , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  J. Michelson,et al.  Intra-articular Load Distribution in the Human Ankle Joint During Motion , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  J. Koh,et al.  The Effect of Graft Height Mismatch on Contact Pressure following Osteochondral Grafting , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  G. Sammarco,et al.  Treatment of Talar Osteochondral Lesions Using Local Osteochondral Graft , 2002, Foot & ankle international.