Measuring variability in trophic status in the Lake Waco/Bosque River Watershed

BackgroundNutrient management in rivers and streams is difficult due to the spatial and temporal variability of algal growth responses. The objectives of this project were to determine the spatial and seasonal in situ variability of trophic status in the Lake Waco/Bosque River watershed, determine the variability in the lotic ecosystem trophic status index (LETSI) at each site as indicators of the system's nutrient sensitivity, and determine if passive diffusion periphytometers could provide threshold algal responses to nutrient enrichment.MethodsWe used the passive diffusion periphytometer to measure in-situ nutrient limitation and trophic status at eight sites in five streams in the Lake Waco/Bosque River Watershed in north-central Texas from July 1997 through October 1998. The chlorophyll a production in the periphytometers was used as an indicator of baseline chlorophyll a productivity and of maximum primary productivity (MPP) in response to nutrient enrichment (nitrogen and phosphorus). We evaluated the lotic ecosystem trophic status index (LETSI) using the ratio of baseline primary productivity to MPP, and evaluated the trophic class of each site.ResultsThe rivers and streams in the Lake Waco/Bosque River Watershed exhibited varying degrees of nutrient enrichment over the 18-month sampling period. The North Bosque River at the headwaters (NB-02) located below the Stephenville, Texas wastewater treatment outfall consistently exhibited the highest degree of water quality impact due to nutrient enrichment. Sites at the outlet of the watershed (NB-04 and NB-05) were the next most enriched sites. Trophic class varied for enriched sites over seasons.ConclusionSeasonality played a significant role in the trophic class and sensitivity of each site to nutrients. Managing rivers and streams for nutrients will require methods for measuring in situ responses and sensitivities to nutrient enrichment. Nutrient enrichment periphytometers show significant potential for use in nutrient gradient studies.

[1]  Marty D. Matlock,et al.  LIMITING NUTRIENT DETERMINATION IN LOTIC ECOSYSTEMS USING A QUANTITATIVE NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT PERIPHYTOMETER 1 , 1998 .

[2]  W. Dodds,et al.  Nutrient limitation of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in ten North American streams , 2003 .

[3]  D. A. Schultz,et al.  The use of the algal growth potential test for data assessment , 1987 .

[4]  James H. Torrie,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach (2nd ed) , 1980 .

[5]  G. J. Mitchell,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach , 1981 .

[6]  J. Cairns,et al.  A Review and Analysis of Some Methods Used to Measure Functional Aspects of Periphyton , 1979 .

[7]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[8]  J. H. Torrie,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York Toronto London. , 1960 .

[9]  B. Biggs,et al.  Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[10]  R. Wagner.  Influence of temperature, photoperiod and nutrition on growth and consumption of Chaetopteryx villosa (Trichoptera) , 1990 .

[11]  Marty D. Matlock,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A LOTIC ECOSYSTEM TROPHIC STATUS INDEX , 1999 .

[12]  E. Stanley,et al.  Variation in nutrient limitation of lotic and lentic algal communities in a Texas (USA) river , 1990, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  John Bennet Lawes,et al.  X. Agricultural, botanical, and chemical results of experiments on the mixed herbage of permanent meadow, conducted for more than twenty years in succession on the same land.—Part I , 1880, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[14]  J. Gaur,et al.  Algal periphyton of an unshaded stream in relation to in situ nutrient enrichment and current velocity , 1994 .

[15]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[16]  Student-Newman-Kuels controls the false discovery rate , 2000 .

[17]  Walter K. Dodds,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams , 2002 .

[18]  R. Hecky,et al.  Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: A review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment1 , 1988 .

[19]  R. Weitzel.  Methods and measurements of periphyton communities : a review , 1979 .

[20]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[21]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 14th edition. , 1976 .

[22]  A. Hershey,et al.  Seasonal Changes in Chlorophyll a Response to Nutrient Amendments in a North Shore Tributary of Lake Superior , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[23]  M. R. Droop,et al.  The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture , 1974, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[24]  D. Correll,et al.  Phosphorus: a rate limiting nutrient in surface waters. , 1999, Poultry science.

[25]  Prostitution In Nevada,et al.  ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers , 1974 .

[26]  J. Adams,et al.  Eutrophication , 2019, Encyclopedia of Ecology.