Commitment at Work and Independence From Management

This article examines a case of advanced teamwork in a Canadian aluminum smelter. It demonstrates a pattern of high commitment at work and acceptance of change combined with a robust independence of workers from management. Control is no longer exerted at the level of work execution but is moved a step higher in the conception and monitoring of production, thus opening the way for workers' self-regulation. The explanation for this pattern lies in workers' tradition of group solidarity, which was expressed through a strong role for the trade union. Comparison with other cases underlies the centrality of worker collective organization if teamwork is to meet workers' as well as managers' expectations.

[1]  Alice Lam.  Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework , 2000 .

[2]  Leonard J. Barchak,et al.  The End of Ideology , 2019, Raymond Aron and Liberal Thought in the Twentieth Century.

[3]  Paul Thompson,et al.  THE POLITICS OF PARTNERSHIP ? INNOVATION IN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS IN THE SCOTTISH SPIRITS INDUSTRY , 1998 .

[4]  John Forth,et al.  All Change at Work?: British employment relations 1980–1998, as portrayed by the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey series , 2000 .

[5]  P. Adler.  Time-and-motion regained , 1993 .

[6]  R. Gottlieb,et al.  Alienation and Freedom , 2003 .

[7]  Bill Harley,et al.  Team Membership and the Experience of Work in Britain: An Analysis of the WERS98 Data , 2001 .

[8]  Paul Edwards,et al.  Modes of Integration and the Diffusion of Best Practice in the Multinational Enterprise , 2001 .

[9]  James W. Rinehart,et al.  Just another car factory? : lean production and its discontents , 1998 .

[10]  Erik Olin Wright,et al.  Working-Class Power , Capitalist-Class Interests , and Class Compromise 1 , 2000 .

[11]  Anthony V. Baltakis.  Learning from Saturn , 2003 .

[12]  Jacques Bélanger.  Autorégulation du travail et division sociale : observation dans une aluminerie québécoise , 2001 .

[13]  Paul Edwards,et al.  The Social Relations of Productivity : A Longitudinal and Comparative Study of Aluminium Smelters , 2003 .

[14]  James D. Wright.  In search of a new working class , 1978 .

[15]  Harvie Ramsay,et al.  Cycles of Control: Worker Participation in Sociological and Historical Perspective , 1977 .

[16]  Paul Edwards,et al.  Does Teamworking Work, and if so, Why? A Case Study in the Aluminium Industry , 1998 .

[17]  Ann C. Frost.  Just another car factory? Lean production and its discontents , 2000 .

[18]  Harley Shaiken,et al.  Two Routes to Team Production: Saturn and Chrysler Compared , 1997 .

[19]  P. Edwards,et al.  Involving employees in total quality management , 1998 .

[20]  Eric Batstone.  LABOUR AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1986 .

[21]  G. Murray.  Work and employment relations in the high performance workplace , 2002 .

[22]  小山 和伸.  Academy of Management Review : 抄録雑誌の概要 , 1987 .

[23]  Jacques Bélanger,et al.  Teamwork and Internal Labour Markets: A Study of a Canadian Aluminium Smelter , 1998 .

[24]  Anthony Dobbins,et al.  Teamworking: a new dynamic in the pursuit of management control , 2001 .

[25]  Riccardo Peccei,et al.  Checking Out Service: Evaluating Excellence, HRM and TQM in Retailing , 1997 .

[26]  Françoise Chevalier,et al.  From Quality Circles to Total Quality , 1991 .