Comparison of Open Discectomy with Microendoscopic Discectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniations: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVEWe compared the intra- and postoperative differences, as well as the final outcome of patients with herniated lumbar discs who underwent either open discectomy (OD) or microendoscopic discectomy (MED). METHODSWe performed a prospective controlled randomized study of 40 patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniations nonresponsive to conservative treatment who underwent OD or MED with a 24-month follow-up period. Pre- and postoperative neurological status, pain, and functional outcome were evaluated. Other studied variables were the duration of the procedure, blood loss, time of hospital stay, and time to return to work. Statistical analysis with a P value less than 0.005 was carried out. RESULTSThe only statistically significant differences found were for size of the incision, length of hospital stay, and operative time. The former two were greater in the OD group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.05, respectively), and the latter was greater in the MED group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONThe few parameters that were found to be statistically significant between the groups did not affect the overall outcome. In the current series, the final clinical and neurological results were similarly satisfactory in both the OD and the MED groups.

[1]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Lumbar disc disease. , 1982, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  P. Pynsent,et al.  The Oswestry Disability Index. , 2000, Spine.

[3]  D. Turk,et al.  Assessment of Chronic Pain Patients , 1994, Seminars in neurology.

[4]  P. Lewis,et al.  Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  M. Yașargil Microsurgical Operation of Herniated Lumbar Disc , 1977 .

[6]  J C Fairbank,et al.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. , 1980, Physiotherapy.

[7]  J. Maroon Current Concepts in Minimally Invasive Discectomy , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[8]  Alf Nachemson,et al.  The Lumbar Spine An Orthopaedic Challenge , 1976 .

[9]  T. Toyone,et al.  Low-back pain following surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Prof. Dr. Franco Postacchini,et al.  Lumbar Disc Herniation , 1999, Springer Vienna.

[11]  A. Brawanski,et al.  When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered? , 2002, Neurosurgical Review.

[12]  R. Williams Lumbar disc disease. Microdiscectomy. , 1993, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[13]  吉田 宗人,et al.  Microendoscopic discectomy. , 1999, Clinical privilege white paper.

[14]  M. Kamimura,et al.  Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc prolapse , 2003, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[15]  W. Caspar A New Surgical Procedure for Lumbar Disc Herniation Causing Less Tissue Damage Through a Microsurgical Approach , 1977 .

[16]  Simeone Fa The neurosurgical approach to lumbar disc disease. , 1971 .

[17]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Microendoscopic Discectomy Compared with Standard Microsurgical Discectomy for Treatment of Uncontained or Large Contained Disc Herniations , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[18]  H. Weber,et al.  Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. , 1983, Spine.

[19]  Maurice M. Smith,et al.  Microendoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Technical Note , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[20]  S. Kahraman,et al.  Outcome Analyses in 1072 Surgically Treated Lumbar Disc Herniations , 1999, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[21]  J. S. Barr,et al.  脊椎管を侵す椎間板のヘルニア(Rupture of the Intervertebral Disc with Involvement of the Spinal Canal) , 1934 .