Inapparent infections shape the transmission heterogeneity of dengue

Abstract Transmission heterogeneity, whereby a disproportionate fraction of pathogen transmission events result from a small number of individuals or geographic locations, is an inherent property of many, if not most, infectious disease systems. For vector-borne diseases, transmission heterogeneity is inferred from the distribution of the number of vectors per host, which could lead to significant bias in situations where vector abundance and transmission risk at the household do not correlate, as is the case with dengue virus (DENV). We used data from a contact tracing study to quantify the distribution of DENV acute infections within human activity spaces (AS), the collection of residential locations an individual routinely visits, and quantified measures of virus transmission heterogeneity from two consecutive dengue outbreaks (DENV-4 and DENV-2) that occurred in the city of Iquitos, Peru. Negative-binomial distributions and Pareto fractions showed evidence of strong overdispersion in the number of DENV infections by AS and identified super-spreading units (SSUs): i.e. AS where most infections occurred. Approximately 8% of AS were identified as SSUs, contributing to more than 50% of DENV infections. SSU occurrence was associated more with DENV-2 infection than with DENV-4, a predominance of inapparent infections (74% of all infections), households with high Aedes aegypti mosquito abundance, and high host susceptibility to the circulating DENV serotype. Marked heterogeneity in dengue case distribution, and the role of inapparent infections in defining it, highlight major challenges faced by reactive interventions if those transmission units contributing the most to transmission are not identified, prioritized, and effectively treated.

[1]  A. Cook,et al.  Fine-scale estimation of effective reproduction numbers for dengue surveillance , 2022, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  E. Harris,et al.  Boosting can explain patterns of fluctuations of ratios of inapparent to symptomatic dengue virus infections , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  William H. Elson,et al.  Disease-driven reduction in human mobility influences human-mosquito contacts and dengue transmission dynamics , 2021, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Melis N. Anahtar,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Boston highlights the impact of superspreading events , 2020, Science.

[5]  Melis N. Anahtar,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in the Boston area highlights the role of recurrent importation and superspreading events. , 2020, medRxiv.

[6]  Max S. Y. Lau,et al.  Characterizing superspreading events and age-specific infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Georgia, USA , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  B. Singer,et al.  The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Lu Wang,et al.  Evaluating Transmission Heterogeneity and Super-Spreading Event of COVID-19 in a Metropolis of China , 2020, medRxiv.

[9]  Thomas W Scott,et al.  Optimizing the deployment of ultra-low volume and targeted indoor residual spraying for dengue outbreak response , 2020, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Yang Liu,et al.  Secondary attack rate and superspreading events for SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, The Lancet.

[11]  Thomas J. Hladish,et al.  Designing effective control of dengue with combined interventions , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Su Yun Kang,et al.  Pareto rules for malaria super-spreaders and super-spreading , 2019, Nature Communications.

[13]  William H. Elson,et al.  Dengue illness impacts daily human mobility patterns in Iquitos, Peru , 2019, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[14]  M. Gambhir,et al.  The role of super-spreading events in Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission: evidence from contact tracing , 2019, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[15]  D. Cummings,et al.  Impact of preexisting dengue immunity on Zika virus emergence in a dengue endemic region , 2019, Science.

[16]  M Elizabeth Halloran,et al.  Forecasting the effectiveness of indoor residual spraying for reducing dengue burden , 2018, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[17]  T. Scott,et al.  Contributions from the silent majority dominate dengue virus transmission , 2018, PLoS pathogens.

[18]  Steven T Stoddard,et al.  The relationship between entomological indicators of Aedes aegypti abundance and dengue virus infection , 2017, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[19]  T. Scott,et al.  Calling in sick: impacts of fever on intra-urban human mobility , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Simon I Hay,et al.  The global burden of dengue: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. , 2016, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[21]  T. Scott,et al.  Coupled Heterogeneities and Their Impact on Parasite Transmission and Control. , 2016, Trends in parasitology.

[22]  E. Harris,et al.  Neutralizing antibody titers against dengue virus correlate with protection from symptomatic infection in a longitudinal cohort , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  T. Scott,et al.  Incomplete Protection against Dengue Virus Type 2 Re-infection in Peru , 2015, bioRxiv.

[24]  Anavaj Sakuntabhai,et al.  Asymptomatic humans transmit dengue virus to mosquitoes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  V. Dukic,et al.  Effects of host heterogeneity on pathogen diversity and evolution. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[26]  T. Scott,et al.  Shifting Patterns of Aedes aegypti Fine Scale Spatial Clustering in Iquitos, Peru , 2014, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[27]  T. Scott,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Global Positioning System (GPS) Data-Loggers and Semi-structured Interviews for Capturing Fine-scale Human Mobility: Findings from Iquitos, Peru , 2014, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[28]  Aaron A. King,et al.  Time-varying, serotype-specific force of infection of dengue virus , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Andrew J. Tatem,et al.  Recasting the theory of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission dynamics and control , 2014, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[30]  T. Scott,et al.  Socially structured human movement shapes dengue transmission despite the diffusive effect of mosquito dispersal. , 2014, Epidemics.

[31]  T. Scott,et al.  Determinants of Heterogeneous Blood Feeding Patterns by Aedes aegypti in Iquitos, Peru , 2014, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[32]  T. Alex Perkins,et al.  Heterogeneity, Mixing, and the Spatial Scales of Mosquito-Borne Pathogen Transmission , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  Edward C. Holmes,et al.  Host and viral features of human dengue cases shape the population of infected and infectious Aedes aegypti mosquitoes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Valerie Paz-Soldan,et al.  Using GPS Technology to Quantify Human Mobility, Dynamic Contacts and Infectious Disease Dynamics in a Resource-Poor Urban Environment , 2013, PloS one.

[35]  John S. Brownstein,et al.  The global distribution and burden of dengue , 2013, Nature.

[36]  T. Scott,et al.  House-to-house human movement drives dengue virus transmission , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Derek A T Cummings,et al.  Revealing the microscale spatial signature of dengue transmission and immunity in an urban population , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Dana A. Focks,et al.  Epidemiology of Dengue Virus in Iquitos, Peru 1999 to 2005: Interepidemic and Epidemic Patterns of Transmission , 2010, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[39]  Ted M Ross Dengue Virus , 2010, Clinics in Laboratory Medicine.

[40]  In-Kyu Yoon,et al.  Prospective cohort studies of dengue viral transmission and severity of disease. , 2010, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[41]  Uriel Kitron,et al.  The Role of Human Movement in the Transmission of Vector-Borne Pathogens , 2009, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[42]  G. Nahler secondary attack rate , 2009 .

[43]  Alun L Lloyd,et al.  Stochasticity and heterogeneity in host–vector models , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[44]  J. Lloyd-Smith Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Negative Binomial Dispersion Parameter for Highly Overdispersed Data, with Applications to Infectious Diseases , 2007, PloS one.

[45]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[46]  Willem Takken,et al.  Ecological aspects for application of genetically modified mosquitoes , 2003 .

[47]  Matt J Keeling,et al.  Modeling dynamic and network heterogeneities in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  C. Dye,et al.  Heterogeneities in the transmission of infectious agents: implications for the design of control programs. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Richard H. Elderkin Population biology of infectious diseases : Life sciences research reports, volume 25. Edited by R.M. Anderson and R.M. May, Springer-Verlag, 1982. $23.00. , 1986 .

[50]  C. Dye,et al.  Population dynamics of mosquito-borne disease: effects of flies which bite some people more frequently than others. , 1986, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[51]  R. May,et al.  Population Biology of Infectious Diseases , 1982, Dahlem Workshop Reports.