Communities of Practice

The mixed methods approach has emerged as a ``third paradigm'' for social research. It has developed a platform of ideas and practices that are credible and distinctive and that mark the approach out as a viable alternative to quantitative and qualitative paradigms. However, there are also a number of variations and inconsistencies within the mixed methods approach that should not be ignored. This article argues the need for a vision of research paradigm that accommodates such variations and inconsistencies. It is argued that the use of ``communities of practice'' as the basis for such a research paradigm is (a) consistent with the pragmatist underpinnings of the mixed methods approach, (b) accommodates a level of diversity, and (c) has good potential for understanding the methodological choices made by those conducting mixed methods research.

[1]  M. Hammersley.  What's Wrong With Ethnography? , 1991 .

[2]  A. Bryman.  Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2007 .

[3]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[4]  Leslie Goodyear,et al.  The Merits of Mixing Methods in Evaluation , 2001 .

[5]  D. Campbell,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences , 1966 .

[6]  J. Greene.  Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? , 2008 .

[7]  The New Era of Mixed Methods , 2007 .

[8]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[9]  Derek Layder.  Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research , 1998 .

[10]  M. Masterman.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: The Nature of a Paradigm , 1970 .

[11]  A. Bryman.  Quantity and quality in social research , 1988 .

[12]  John Mitchell,et al.  Communities of practice : reshaping professional practice and improving organisational productivity in the Vocational Education and Training (VET) sector - resources for practitioners , 2001 .

[13]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  What Can the Literature on Communities of Practice Tell Us about Educational Research? Reflections on Some Recent Proposals. , 2005 .

[14]  Phil Hodkinson,et al.  Research as a form of work: expertise, community and methodological objectivity , 2004 .

[15]  B. Somekh,et al.  Research methods in the social sciences , 2005 .

[16]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook , 1999 .

[17]  L. Brazen.  Educational Research , 1959, Nature.

[18]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[19]  N. Denzin.  The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1970 .

[20]  M. Hammersley.  The dilemma of qualitative method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago tradition , 1991 .

[21]  J. Creswell,et al.  Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods , 2007 .

[22]  Sharon F. Rallis,et al.  The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. , 1994 .

[23]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Editorial: Exploring the Nature of Research Questions in Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[24]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[25]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Mixed-Method Research: Introduction and Application , 1999 .

[26]  George R. Franke,et al.  HANDBOOK OF MIXED METHODS IN SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (Book) , 2004 .

[27]  Kathleen M. T. Collins,et al.  A Model Incorporating the Rationale and Purpose for Conducting Mixed-Methods Research in Special Education and Beyond , 2006 .

[28]  M. Guha.  The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods , 2005 .

[29]  A. Bryman.  Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2006 .

[30]  D. Silverman.  Qualitative Methodology and Sociology: Describing the Social World , 1985 .

[31]  Cleo H. Cherryholmes.  Notes on Pragmatism and Scientific Realism , 1992 .

[32]  Chris Taylor,et al.  Combining Methods in Educational and Social Research. Conducting Educational Research. , 2004 .

[33]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice: learning as a social system , 1998 .

[34]  L. Harvey.  The myths of the Chicago School , 1986 .

[35]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Anthony P. M. Coxon,et al.  Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data: What does the User Need? , 2005 .

[37]  P. Richards.  Health research , 1954, Nature.

[38]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[39]  G. Postiglione.  The Nature as Paradigm , 2002 .

[40]  Stephen Gorard,et al.  Combining Methods in Educational and Social Research , 2004 .

[41]  D. Campbell,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences. , 1966 .

[42]  A. Hunter,et al.  Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles , 1989 .

[43]  Alexandru Tupan,et al.  Triangulation , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[44]  R. Donovan.  Consequences of Pragmatism , 1983 .

[45]  Thomas D. Cook,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation , 1979 .

[46]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[47]  Malcolm Williams.  New strategies in social research , 2006 .

[48]  Richard Shusterman,et al.  The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture , 1992 .

[49]  E. Mayo.  The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization , 1934, Nature.

[50]  W. Mackenzie,et al.  The Management and the Worker , 2008 .

[51]  Lois-Ellin Datta,et al.  Paradigm wars: A basis for peaceful coexistence and beyond , 1994 .

[52]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[53]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[54]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[55]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[56]  Carolyn L Murdaugh,et al.  Handbook of Data Analysis , 2006 .

[57]  Robert H. Ennis,et al.  Philosophy of educational research , 1973 .

[58]  A. Bryman,et al.  The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods (three volumes) , 2003 .

[59]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[60]  T. Broadbent,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge , 1972 .

[61]  Gretchen Rossman,et al.  Mixed Methods in Evaluation Contexts: A Pragmatic Framework , 2003 .

[62]  L. Giddings.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2d ed , 2005 .

[63]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[64]  N. Leech,et al.  On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies , 2005 .

[65]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[66]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[67]  Emery R. Hayhurst,et al.  The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization , 1934 .