Estimating aqueous solvation and lipophilicity of small organic molecules: A comparative overview of atom/group contribution methods

Methods for the calculation of two properties of interest in drug design, namely free energy of aqueous solvation and lipophilicity (log P), using fragmental methods are reviewed here. Though aqueous solvation free energies are commonly estimated using `whole molecule' methods such as GB/SA and AMSOL, we have recently shown that fragmental approaches can offer high quality predictions as well (for molecules of the size of 20 atoms or less). In the case of log P predictions, the more commonly used ALOGP and CLOGP approaches represent the two extremes of the fragmental constant approach: ALOGP uses atom-sized fragments and no correction factors; CLOGP uses larger fragments and correction factors, which are typically obtained for each series of molecules separately. Anew approach (HLOGP) that uses both smaller (atom-sized) and larger fragments is shown to offer better performance than the other two widely used methods for the prediction of lipophilicity. In this approach, an automated `inventory' of fragments (bonded atom combinations) within a molecule, known as molecular hologram, is used as a composite descriptor and it is used in conjunction with partial least squares for the prediction of aqueous solvation or lipophilicity. It is emphasized that these different methods are useful in different types of drug design applications involving small organic molecules.

[1]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[2]  P. Furet,et al.  3D molecular lipophilicity potential profiles: a new tool in molecular modeling , 1988 .

[3]  A Wlodawer,et al.  An approach to rapid estimation of relative binding affinities of enzyme inhibitors: application to peptidomimetic inhibitors of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  J. Hine,et al.  Structural effects on rates and equilibriums. XIX. Intrinsic hydrophilic character of organic compounds. Correlations in terms of structural contributions , 1975 .

[5]  Thorsten Naumann,et al.  HQSAR: A New, Highly Predictive QSAR Technique , 1997 .

[6]  A. Leo.  CALCULATING LOG POCT FROM STRUCTURES , 1993 .

[7]  C. Hansch,et al.  A NEW SUBSTITUENT CONSTANT, PI, DERIVED FROM PARTITION COEFFICIENTS , 1964 .

[8]  J N Weinstein,et al.  Mapping the binding site of the nucleoside transporter protein: a 3D-OSAR study. , 1990, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[9]  J. Sangster.  Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry , 1997 .

[10]  A. Ghose,et al.  Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three‐Dimensional Structure‐Directed Quantitative Structure‐Activity Relationships I. Partition Coefficients as a Measure of Hydrophobicity , 1986 .

[11]  P. Broto,et al.  Molecular structures: perception, autocorrelation descriptor and sar studies: system of atomic contributions for the calculation of the n-octanol/water partition coefficients , 1984 .

[12]  Arup K. Ghose,et al.  Prediction of Solvation Free Energies of Small Organic Molecules: Additive-Constitutive Models Based on Molecular Fingerprints and Atomic Constants , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Luhua Lai,et al.  A New Atom-Additive Method for Calculating Partition Coefficients , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[14]  P. Kollman,et al.  Investigating the Anomalous Solvation Free Energies of Amines with a Polarizable Potential , 1996 .

[15]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[16]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Free Energies of Hydration for Organic Molecules from Monte Carlo Simulations , 1995 .

[17]  M. Rami Reddy,et al.  Assessment of methods used for predicting lipophilicity: Application to nucleosides and nucleoside bases , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  N. Bodor,et al.  An extended version of a novel method for the estimation of partition coefficients. , 1992, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[19]  G M Crippen,et al.  Modeling the benzodiazepine receptor binding site by the general three-dimensional structure-directed quantitative structure-activity relationship method REMOTEDISC. , 1990, Molecular pharmacology.

[20]  A. Leo,et al.  Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology , 1979 .

[21]  Arup K. Ghose,et al.  Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics , 1989, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[22]  A. Ghose,et al.  Prediction of Hydrophobic (Lipophilic) Properties of Small Organic Molecules Using Fragmental Methods: An Analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP Methods , 1998 .

[23]  A. Ghose,et al.  Structural mimicry of adenosine by the antitumor agents 4-methoxy- and 4-amino-8-(beta-D-ribofuranosylamino)pyrimido[5,4-d]pyrimidine as viewed by a molecular modeling method. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Vijay K. Gombar,et al.  Assessment of n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient: When Is the Assessment Reliable? , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[25]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[26]  N. Bodor,et al.  A new method for the estimation of partition coefficient , 1989 .

[27]  A. Ghose,et al.  Use of physicochemical parameters in distance geometry and related three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships: a demonstration using Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.