Large bowel cancer: Surgical pathology and its relationship to survival

Modifications of Dukes' (1932) classification of rectal tumours have led to confusion. From the data of 2518 patients who had undergone curative colorectal surgery the interrelationships between tumour penetration, grade, vascular invasion and pattern of lymph node involvement have been examined and their individual relevance to survival determined. Subdivision of Dukes' A cases into those confined to the muscularis mucosae (A) and those penetrating into, but not through, the bowel wall (B1) should be abandoned. Despite interrelationships between lymph node status, grade of tumour and vascular invasion, they all contribute prognostic information independent of each other. Apical lymph node involvement, more than four lymph nodes involved and extensive primary tumours with nodal involvement all carry a bad prognosis. Although interrelated each variable is individually relevant. However, subgroups of patients with Dukes' C tumours have an observed survival significantly better than expected. When few lymph nodes are involved or the primary tumour is confined to the bowel wall but lymph nodes are involved, the expectation of life is equivalent to Dukes' B.

[1]  Michael Greatorex,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 2015 .

[2]  R C Newland,et al.  Terminology and classification of colorectal adenocarcinoma: the Australian clinico-pathological staging system. , 1983, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[3]  R. Zaino,et al.  Colorectal carcinoma: Evaluation of histologic grade and factors influencing prognosis , 1982, Journal of surgical oncology.

[4]  R. Fitzgerald What is the Dukes' system for carcinoma of the rectum? , 1982, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[5]  J. Scott,et al.  Diagnosis and survival in carcinoma of the large bowel. , 1982, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[6]  J. Feldman,et al.  The influence of age upon the survival of adult patients with carcinoma of the colon. , 1981, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[7]  S. Stewart-Brown,et al.  Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. , 1981, Journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  P. Chapuis,et al.  The relationship of survival to staging and grading of colorectal carcinoma: A prospective study of 503 cases , 1981, Cancer.

[9]  C. Dukes,et al.  The classification of cancer of the rectum , 1980 .

[10]  S. Stewart-Brown,et al.  Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. , 1980 .

[11]  I. Talbot,et al.  The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer , 1980, The British journal of surgery.

[12]  E. Hughes,et al.  I. Carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid: Cancer specific long‐term survival. A series of 1061 cases treated by one surgeon , 1980, Cancer.

[13]  S. Stewart-Brown,et al.  Large-bowel obstruction caused by cancer: a prospective study. , 1979, British medical journal.

[14]  S. Stewart-Brown,et al.  SURGEON-RELATED VARIABLES AND THE CLINICAL TRIAL , 1978, The Lancet.

[15]  C. Rubio,et al.  A critical reappraisal of Dukes' classification. , 1977, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[16]  Goligher Jc The Dukes' A, B and C categorization of the extent of spread of carcinomas of the rectum. , 1976 .

[17]  M. Whittaker,et al.  The prognosis after surgical treatment for carcinoma of the rectum , 1976, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  Turnbull Rb Current concepts in cancer. Cancer of the GI tract: colon, rectum, anus. The no-touch isolation technique of resection. , 1975 .

[19]  R. Turnbull The No-Touch Isolation Technique of Resection , 1975 .

[20]  M. Pike,et al.  Conservatism of the approximation sigma (O-E)2-E in the logrank test for survival data or tumor incidence data. , 1973, Biometrics.

[21]  I. D. Hill Computing man years at risk. , 1972, British journal of preventive & social medicine.

[22]  J. S. Jones,et al.  Adenocarcinoma of the Large Bowel , 1971, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  F. R. Watson,et al.  Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates. , 1967, Annals of surgery.

[24]  F. Ederer,et al.  Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. , 1958, Journal of chronic diseases.

[25]  Road,et al.  The Spread of Rectal Cancer and its Effect on Prognosis , 1958, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  F. A. Coller,et al.  THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF DIRECT EXTENSION OF CARCINOMA OF THE COLON AND RECTUM , 1954, Annals of surgery.

[27]  Howard Gt Carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. , 1946, The Journal of the Tennessee State Medical Association. Tennessee State Medical Association.

[28]  C. Dukes Cancer of the rectum: An analysis of 1000 cases , 1940 .

[29]  W. B. Gabriel,et al.  Lymphatic spread in cancer of the rectum , 1935 .

[30]  C. Dukes,et al.  III. The treatment of carcinoma of the rectum with radium. With an introduction on the spread of cancer of the rectum , 1930 .

[31]  L. Zinkin,et al.  A critical review of the classifications and staging of colorectal cancer , 1983, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[32]  S J Pocock,et al.  Long term survival analysis: the curability of breast cancer. , 1982, Statistics in medicine.

[33]  D. Roseman,et al.  Staging of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. , 1980, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[34]  D. C. Dashfield HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE , 1954 .

[35]  J. Kirklin,et al.  The role of the peritoneal reflection in the prognosis of carcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid colon. , 1949, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.