Determinants of femoral geometry and structure during adolescent growth

Our goal was to understand developmental determinants of femoral structure during growth and sexual maturation by relating femoral measurements to gender and developmental factors (age, pubertal stage, height, and body mass). The bone mineral content of the femur was measured by dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry in 101 healthy Caucasian adolescents and young adults, 9–26 years of age. After some simplifying assumptions had been made, cross‐sectional geometric properties of the femoral midshaft were estimated. Two geometry‐based structural indicators, the section modulus and whole bone strength index, were calculated to assess the structural characteristics of the femur. Femoral strength, as described by these structural indicators, increased dramatically from childhood through young adulthood. Regressions were performed between these femoral measurements and the developmental factors. Our data show that of age, pubertal stage, body mass, and height, body mass is the strongest predictor of femoral cross‐sectional properties, and the correlation of body mass with femoral cross‐sectional structure is independent of gender. A model including all four developmental factors and gender did not substantially increase the accuracy of predictions compared with the model with body mass alone. In light of previous research, we hypothesize that body mass is an indicator of in vivo loading and that this in vivo loading influences the cross‐sectional growth of the long bones.

[1]  D. Carter,et al.  Developmental mechanics determine long bone allometry. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Mechanobiologic influences in long bone cross-sectional growth. , 1993, Bone.

[3]  A. Hassall,et al.  Factors affecting bone mineral density in high school girls. , 1992, The New Zealand medical journal.

[4]  D. Carter,et al.  Clinical and anthropometric correlates of bone mineral acquisition in healthy adolescent girls. , 1991, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[5]  C. Ruff,et al.  Articular and diaphyseal remodeling of the proximal femur with changes in body mass in adults. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  S L Hui,et al.  Role of physical activity in the development of skeletal mass in children , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  I. Litt,et al.  Decreased bone density in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa. , 1990, Pediatrics.

[8]  W. Hayes,et al.  Bone-mineral content in the lower limb. Relationship to cross-sectional geometry. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  D. R. Sumner,et al.  Postembryonic dimensional allometry of the human femur. , 1984, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  T. M. Graber Manual of physical status and performance in childhood , 1983 .

[11]  L. Neinstein Adolescent Self-assessment of Sexual Maturation , 1982, Clinical pediatrics.

[12]  W C Hayes,et al.  The effect of prolonged physical training on the properties of long bone: a study of Wolff's Law. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  I. Litt,et al.  Adolescents' self-assessment of sexual maturation. , 1980, Pediatrics.

[14]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Effect of puberty on rates of bone growth and mineralisation: with observations in male delayed puberty. , 1979, Archives of disease in childhood.

[15]  Z. Jaworski,et al.  Bone loss in response to long-term immobilisation. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  R. Robinson Physicochemical Structure of Bone , 1975 .

[17]  J. Currey,et al.  The mechanical properties of bone tissue in children. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  A. R. Frisancho,et al.  Subperiosteal and endosteal bone apposition during adolescence. , 1970, Human biology.

[19]  J A Weatherell,et al.  Variation in the density of the femoral diaphysis with age. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  M. Maresh Linear growth of long bones of extremities from infancy through adolescence; continuing studies. , 1955, A.M.A. American journal of diseases of children.

[21]  C. Ruff,et al.  Postcranial robusticity in Homo. III: Ontogeny. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[22]  S. Glantz Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance / Stanton A. Glantz, Bryan K. Slinker , 1990 .

[23]  D R Carter,et al.  Scaling of long bone fracture strength with animal mass. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  D B Burr,et al.  Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  R. Malina,et al.  Manual of Physical Status and Performance in Childhood , 1983, Springer US.

[26]  R. Martin,et al.  Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  J. Tanner,et al.  Growth at adolescence : with a general consideration of the effects of hereditary and environmental factors upon growth and maturation from birth to maturity , 1962 .