Fouling-resistant membranes for the treatment of flowback water from hydraulic shale fracturing: A pilot study

Abstract Polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber ultrafiltration (UF) and polyamide spiral wound reverse osmosis (RO) membrane modules were surface-modified by contact with an aqueous solution containing dopamine to deposit polydopamine on the membrane surfaces and other wetted parts inside the modules. UF modules were further modified by grafting poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) brushes to the polydopamine coating. Polydopamine and polydopamine-g-PEG coatings increase hydrophilicity of the membrane surfaces and have previously been shown to improve fouling resistance towards model oil/water emulsions in laboratory studies. In a pilot-scale test treating hydraulic fracturing flowback water from the Barnett Shale region of Texas, the fouling performance of modified UF and RO membrane modules was compared to that of unmodified analogs. UF modules were used to remove most of the highly fouling organic matter in the feed before desalination by a train of RO elements. Polydopamine-modified UF modules maintained higher flux, lower transmembrane pressure difference, and improved cleaning efficiency relative to unmodified modules. The polydopamine coating did not appear to improve RO fouling behavior, presumably because most of the organic foulants had been removed by UF pretreatment of the feedwater. However, higher and more stable salt rejection was observed in modified RO modules than in unmodified modules.

[1]  Stephen Rassenfoss,et al.  From Flowback to Fracturing: Water Recycling Grows in the Marcellus Shale , 2011 .

[2]  Peter K. Eriksson,et al.  Temperature effects on the performance of thin-film composite, aromatic polyamide membranes , 1989 .

[3]  Lensie Owlen Paugh.  Marcellus Shale Water Management Challenges in Pennsylvania , 2008 .

[4]  James S. Taylor,et al.  Assessment of ASTM D 4516 for evaluation of reverse osmosis membrane performance , 2005 .

[5]  Linda Zou,et al.  Surface hydrophilic modification of RO membranes by plasma polymerization for low organic fouling , 2011 .

[6]  Robin Beckwith,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing: The Fuss, The Facts, The Future , 2010 .

[7]  B. Freeman,et al.  In fl uence of polydopamine deposition conditions on pure water fl ux and foulant adhesion resistance of reverse osmosis , ultra fi ltration , and micro fi ltration membranes , 2010 .

[8]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Microbial adhesion to poly(ethylene oxide) brushes: influence of polymer chain length and temperature. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[9]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water Purification by Membranes: The Role of Polymer Science , 2010 .

[10]  E. P. Jacobs,et al.  UF of pulp and paper effluent: membrane fouling-prevention and cleaning , 2002 .

[11]  R. Baker.  Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[12]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. , 2009, Water research.

[13]  R. L. Riley,et al.  Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes , 1965 .

[14]  B. Freeman,et al.  Influence of polydopamine deposition conditions on pure water flux and foulant adhesion resistance of reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, and microfiltration membranes , 2010 .

[15]  Nandakishore Rajagopalan,et al.  Membrane processing of oily streams. Wastewater treatment and waste reduction , 1998 .

[16]  Michael B. Smith,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing: History of an Enduring Technology , 2010 .

[17]  B. Freeman,et al.  Transport of Gases and Vapors in Glassy and Rubbery Polymers , 2006 .

[18]  B. Freeman,et al.  A bioinspired fouling-resistant surface modification for water purification membranes , 2012 .

[19]  M. Abdel-Jawad,et al.  Standarization of RO membrane performance , 1998 .

[20]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[21]  S. Edmondson,et al.  Polydopamine-melanin initiators for Surface-initiated ATRP , 2011 .

[22]  B. McCloskey.  Novel surface modifications and materials for fouling resistant water purification membranes , 2009 .

[23]  B. Freeman,et al.  PEG-coated reverse osmosis membranes: Desalination properties and fouling resistance , 2009 .

[24]  Shuang Liang,et al.  Two-step optimization of pressure and recovery of reverse osmosis desalination process. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Haeshin Lee,et al.  Mussel-Inspired Surface Chemistry for Multifunctional Coatings , 2007, Science.

[26]  B. Freeman,et al.  Effect of crossflow testing conditions, including feed pH and continuous feed filtration, on commercial reverse osmosis membrane performance , 2009 .

[27]  B. Freeman,et al.  Effect of polydopamine deposition conditions on fouling resistance, physical properties, and permeation properties of reverse osmosis membranes in oil/water separation , 2013 .

[28]  Roger R. Myers,et al.  Marcellus Shale Post-Frac Flowback Waters - Where is All the Salt Coming from and What are the Implications? , 2009 .

[29]  George E. King,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing 101: What Every Representative, Environmentalist, Regulator, Reporter, Investor, University Researcher, Neighbor and Engineer Should Know About Estimating Frac Risk and Improving Frac Performance in Unconventional Gas and Oil Wells , 2012 .