A phase II safety and efficacy study of amprenavir in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine in HIV-infected patients with limited antiretroviral experience. Amprenavir PROAB2002 Study Team.

OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and efficacy of amprenavir (APV) in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and zidovudine (ZDV). DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, partially blinded trial. SETTING Nine study sites in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS A group of 84 HIV-infected subjects with no prior 3TC or protease inhibitor therapy experience, CD4 cell count > or = 150 x 10(6) cells/l, and plasma HIV RNA > 10000 copies/ml. INTERVENTIONS 3TC/ZDV with one of three doses of APV (900, 1050, or 1200 mg) versus 3TC/ZDV with 1050 mg placebo. All medications were dosed twice daily. The 1050 mg placebo and the APV 1050 mg dose were administered blinded. After 12 weeks, APV 1050 mg was substituted for 1050 mg placebo in the control group and the blind was maintained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Reduction in plasma HIV RNA from baseline; proportion of subjects with plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml; and an increase in CD4 cell count from baseline. RESULTS During the initial 12-week study period, APV/3TC/ZDV-treated subjects had greater viral suppression than the group receiving two nucleosides. By 48 weeks, 89% of subjects in the group taking the highest APV dose (1200 mg) had plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml while 42% of the 900 mg group and 60% of the 3TC/ZDV group (1050 mg APV added at week 12) had plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml using an as-treated analysis. By 60 weeks, 86% of subjects in the APV 1200 mg group had plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml in the as-treated analysis, while 25% (900 mg), 43% (1050 mg), and 20% (1200 mg) of subjects had viral load <400 copies/ml in a strict intent-to-treat analysis owing to treatment discontinuations. Median CD4 cell count increases at week 60 were highest for the three treatment groups who received APV throughout the study, by intent-to-treat and as-treated analyses. The most common adverse events considered to be possibly drug related were nausea, rash, oral paresthesia, diarrhea, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with APV, dosed at 1200 mg twice daily in combination with 3TC/ZDV, resulted in sustained viral suppression. This combination represents a potent alternative initial antiretroviral regimen for protease inhibitor-naive individuals.

[1]  D Johnson,et al.  The value of patient-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in predicting virologic and immunologic response. California Collaborative Treatment Group. , 1999, AIDS.

[2]  B. Gazzard,et al.  1998 revision to the British HIV Association guidelines for antiretroviral treatment of HIV seropositive individuals , 1998, The Lancet.

[3]  C. Decker,et al.  Metabolism of amprenavir in liver microsomes: role of CYP3A4 inhibition for drug interactions. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[4]  S. Hammer,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1997. Updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel. , 1998, JAMA.

[5]  B Clotet,et al.  Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adults with HIV infection: implications for clinical management. International AIDS Society--USA Panel. , 1998, JAMA.

[6]  D. Cooper,et al.  Pathogenesis of HIV-1-protease inhibitor-associated peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia, and insulin resistance , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  D. Cooper,et al.  Abnormal fat distribution and use of protease inhibitors , 1998, The Lancet.

[8]  David A. Cooper,et al.  A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors , 1998, AIDS.

[9]  C. Flexner HIV-protease inhibitors. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  G. Satten,et al.  Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  K. Sepkowitz Effect of HAART on natural history of AIDS-related opportunistic disorders , 1998, The Lancet.

[12]  N. Graham,et al.  Potential factors affecting adherence with HIV therapy , 1997, AIDS.

[13]  M A Fischl,et al.  A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Currier,et al.  Protease inhibitor-associated hyperglycaemia , 1997, The Lancet.

[15]  J. Mestan,et al.  In Vitro Effect of α1-Acid Glycoprotein on the Anti—Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Activity of the Protease Inhibitor CGP 61755: A Comparative Study with Other Relevant HIV Protease Inhibitors , 1997 .

[16]  S. Pazhanisamy,et al.  Weak binding of VX-478 to human plasma proteins and implications for anti-human immunodeficiency virus therapy. , 1995, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  R. Myers,et al.  In vitro selection and characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates with reduced sensitivity to hydroxyethylamino sulfonamide inhibitors of HIV-1 aspartyl protease , 1995, Journal of virology.

[18]  B. G. Rao,et al.  In vitro selection and characterization of VX-478 resistant HIV-1 variants. , 1998, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[19]  B. Sadler,et al.  In vitro antiviral activity of 141W94 (VX-478) in combination with other antiretroviral agents. , 1996, Antiviral research.