The ECAT ART Scanner for Positron Emission Tomography. 1. Improvements in Performance Characteristics.

The widespread use of positron emission tomography (PET) has been to some extent limited by the cost and complexity of PET instrumentation. Recognition of the wider applicability of clinical PET imaging is reflected in the ECAT ART design, a low cost PET scanner targeted for clinical applications, particularly in oncology. The ART comprises two asymmetrically opposed arrays of BGO block detectors. Each array consists of 88 (transaxial) by 24 (axial) crystals, and the arrays rotate continuously at 30 rpm to acquire a full 3D projection data set. Sensitivity and count rate limitations are key performance parameters for any imaging device. This paper reports on improved performance characteristics of the ART, achieved by operating the scanner with a decreased block integration time, reduced coincidence time window, and collimated singles transmission sources. Compared to the standard ART configuration, these modifications result in both improved count rate performance and higher quality transmission scans.

[1]  J. Colsher,et al.  Fully-three-dimensional positron emission tomography , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  D Delbeke,et al.  Prospective investigation of positron emission tomography in lung nodules. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[4]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  D. Vozza,et al.  Simulating the performances of an LSO based position encoding detector for PET , 1996 .

[6]  Y. Koide,et al.  Evaluation of esophageal cancers using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  B. C. Grabmaier Crystal Scintillators , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  M. Defrise,et al.  Three dimensional reconstruction of PET data from a multi-ring camera , 1989 .

[9]  S Grootoonk,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Positron Scanner ECAT EXACT , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  R. Wahl,et al.  Triple-head SPECT with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG): initial evaluation in oncology and comparison with FDG PET. , 1995, Radiology.

[11]  M Dahlbom,et al.  Hybrid Mercuric Iodide (HgI2) - Gadolinium Orthosilicate (GSO) Detector for PET , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  T. J. Paulus Timing Electronics and Fast Timing Methods with Scintillation Detectors , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  R. Nutt,et al.  A Multicrystal Two Dimensional BGO Detector System for Positron Emission Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  Roberto A. Isoardi,et al.  Volume Imaging Tomographs , 1998 .

[15]  P. Cutler,et al.  Local threshold for segmented attenuation correction of PET imaging of the thorax , 1993 .

[16]  S Grootoonk,et al.  A rotating PET scanner using BGO block detectors: design, performance and applications. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Bernard Bendriem,et al.  Investigation of noise equivalent count rate in positron imaging using a dual head gamma camera , 1997 .

[18]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  NECR analysis of 3D brain PET scanner designs , 1995 .

[19]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  J. Kuperus,et al.  Technology for FDG SPECT with a relatively inexpensive gamma camera. Work in progress. , 1994, Radiology.

[21]  M. Greco,et al.  Prospective evaluation of fluorine-18-FDG PET in presurgical staging of the axilla in breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  C Nahmias,et al.  Attenuation correction in PET using single photon transmission measurement. , 1994, Medical physics.

[23]  M P Sandler,et al.  FDG-SPECT: correlation with FDG-PET. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  J. G. Rogers,et al.  A count rate model for PET and its application to an LSO HR PLUS scanner , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[25]  A Geissbuhler,et al.  Rotating positron tomographs revisited. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.