Iterative image reconstruction in MRI with separate magnitude and phase regularization

Iterative methods for image reconstruction in MRI are useful in several applications, including reconstruction from non-Cartesian k-space samples, compensation for magnetic field inhomogeneities, and imaging with multiple receive coils. Existing iterative MR image reconstruction methods are either unregularized, and therefore sensitive to noise, or have used regularization methods that smooth the complex valued image. These existing methods regularize the real and imaginary components of the image equally. In many MRI applications, including T/sub 2/*-weighted imaging as used in fMRI BOLD imaging, one expects most of the signal information of interest to be contained in the magnitude of the voxel value, whereas the phase values are expected to vary smoothly spatially. This paper proposes separate regularization of the magnitude and phase components, preserving the spatial resolution of the magnitude component while strongly regularizing the phase component. This leads to a non-convex regularized least-squares cost function. We describe a new iterative algorithm that monotonically decreases this cost function. The resulting images have reduced noise relative to conventional regularization methods.

[1]  D. Hunter,et al.  Optimization Transfer Using Surrogate Objective Functions , 2000 .

[2]  D. Noll,et al.  Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[3]  A. Macovski,et al.  Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding [computerised tomography application]. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[4]  Kenneth Lange,et al.  Numerical analysis for statisticians , 1999 .

[5]  J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Medical image processing and analysis , 2000 .

[6]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Nonuniform fast Fourier transforms using min-max interpolation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[7]  Hakan Erdogan,et al.  Monotonic algorithms for transmission tomography , 2002, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[8]  Alvaro R. De Pierro,et al.  A modified expectation maximization algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Fast, iterative image reconstruction for MRI in the presence of field inhomogeneities , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k‐space trajectories , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  W. Clem Karl,et al.  Feature-enhanced synthetic aperture radar image formation based on nonquadratic regularization , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[13]  Douglas C Noll,et al.  Dynamic field map estimation using a spiral‐in/spiral‐out acquisition , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Fessler Statistical Image Reconstruction Methods for Transmission Tomography , 2000 .

[15]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.