Hybrid PET/MR Imaging in Neurology: Present Applications and Prospects for the Future

Since the first prototypes (1,2) and the first commercial scanner (3), PET has developed to multiring systems permitting highresolution and 3-dimensional imaging of various physiologic, functional, and molecular targets. The first applications of PET were in brain research, and despite the many other diagnostic indications, particularly in oncology and cardiology, brain imaging remains a stronghold of PET. Despite the development of multiring systems covering the whole brain, PET images still suffered from limited spatial resolution (2.3 and 2.5 mm in the transaxial and axial directions, respectively, with the High Resolution Research Tomograph (4)), low sensitivity, and insufficient attenuation and scatter correction. Multimodal imaging of physiologic and metabolic variables by PET requires coregistration to CT or MRI for accurate correspondence to the anatomic structures and to pathologic changes. MRI is the best method to image the morphology of the brain in health and disease, and various MR modalities can additionally be used to assess physiologic and metabolic parameters such as vascular supply (contrast-enhanced MRI), perfusion (perfusion-weighted imaging), edema (diffusion-weighted imaging), functional activation (functional MRI), and concentration of defined substrates (MR spectroscopy). Pooling information obtained with MRI and PET has long been performed through a parallel analysis of the sequentially acquired data and, more commonly today, using software coregistration techniques. However, underlying such studies is the assumption that no significant changes in physiologic or cognitive conditions have occurred between the 2 examinations. Although a good assumption for some studies, this may not be the case more generally. For example, a subject’s mental state may change on time frames from minutes to even seconds, whereas physiologic and metabolic changes can occur on the order of minutes in some disease conditions such as acute ischemic stroke or migraine. Likewise, rapid changes in baseline physiology can occur with some therapeutic interventions. One means to address such potential pitfalls is through the simultaneous collection of MRI and PET data. The feasibility of simultaneous PET and MRI data acquisition for human studies was first demonstrated in 2007, and proof-of-principle brain data were collected using a prototype MRI-compatible PET insert—called BrainPET—positioned inside a commercially available 3-TMRI Trio system (Siemens Medical Solutions) (5). In 2010, a fully integrated PET/MR scanner also became available for human whole-body imaging (Biograph mMR) (6). Simultaneous PET/MR allows spatial and temporal correlation of the signals from both modalities, creating opportunities impossible to realize using sequentially acquired data. The features of this new technology may be particularly appealing to applications for translational research in neuroscience, considering that MRI represents the first-line diagnostic imaging modality for numerous indications and that a great number of specific PET tracers are available today to assess functional and molecular processes in the brain. Simultaneous imaging certainly yields benefits with regard to patient management and time saving. Avoiding the repositioning of the patient improves coregistration and localization of anatomic structures and lesions: this is of great advantage in the presurgical diagnosis of patients with focal epilepsy, for which small lesions, hypoplasias, or heterotopies can be delineated (7,8). Improved differentiation of different tissue types by combined metabolic and morphologic imaging is of great importance in the differential diagnosis of brain tumors, for grading of gliomas, for the assessment of progression and the distinction between necrosis and recurrence; it also helps in the selection of the most promising place for biopsies and in the evaluation of treatment effects (7,9–14). Further information on effects of tumors on morphology, function, and metabolism of the surrounding brain may be obtained by adding diffusion tensor imaging/fiber tracking, functional MRI, perfusion-weighted imaging, MR spectroscopy, and activation PET to the multimodal imaging (15–17), by which anaerobic changes in energy metabolism in tumor and peritumor tissue, alterations in efferent and connecting fiber tracts, and task-related activation patterns within functional networks can be visualized. Coregistration of structure and metabolism together with simultaneous assessment of synaptic function are important for early recognition and differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment and for understanding the pathophysiology—for example, deposition of amyloid, tau, or other abnormal proteins—of degenerative disorders. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer dementia and even detection of prestates of this devastating disorder can be achieved by MRI (hippocampal atrophy) combined to PET for measurement of glucose consumption and accumulation of amyloid and tau, which should be used for the selection of patients in treatment trials; the multimodal imaging permits also the differential diagnosis to other degenerative diseases (18–22). Further insights into the development of cognitive disturbances will be obtained by adding PET studies of synaptic function, for example, cholinergic and serotoninergic transmission (18,23). Synergistic measurement of different physiologic parameters can explain functional impairment and predicts the development of Received Mar. 7, 2016; revision accepted Mar. 8, 2016. For correspondence and reprints contact: Wolf-Dieter Heiss, Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research, Gleueler Strasse 50, Cologne, 50931, Germany. E-mail: wdh@sf.mpg.de Published online Apr. 7, 2016. COPYRIGHT © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.175208