DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF A CAMERA NETWORK ACROSS AN ELEVATION GRADIENT FOR HABITAT ASSESSMENT

Developments in distributed sensing, web camera image databases, and automated data visualization and analysis, among other emerging opportunities, have resulted in a suite of new techniques for monitoring habitat at many different scales. Data from these networks can provide important information on the timing of plant phenology with implications for habitat status and condition. In this article, we describe the design and deployment of a small network of cameras established along an elevation gradient in western Alberta, Canada, with the purpose of developing a more comprehensive understanding of seasonal phenophases and the reproductive timing of understory forest vegetation. During an eight-month period in 2009, over 6,700 images were acquired across seven sites throughout the growing season, providing a rich dataset documenting phenological activity of both the under- and overstory forest components. Strong elevation and climate responses were observed. A mathematical function was fitted to the data to demonstrate the capacity to capture phenological trends. This article demonstrates the utility of these types of relatively inexpensive, portable systems for monitoring seasonal vegetation development and change at high temporal resolutions across landscapes.

[1]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Canopy duration has little influence on annual carbon storage in the deciduous broad leaf forest , 2003 .

[2]  William W. Hargrove,et al.  A continental strategy for the National Ecological Observatory Network , 2008 .

[3]  Douglas A. Frank,et al.  The ecology of the earth's grazing ecosystems: Profound functional similarities exist between the Serengeti and Yellowstone , 1998 .

[4]  Steven W. Running,et al.  A regional phenology model for detecting onset of greenness in temperate mixed forests, Korea: an application of MODIS leaf area index , 2003 .

[5]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Linking ground-based to satellite-derived phenological metrics in support of habitat assessment , 2012 .

[6]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  SEASONAL AND DIEL PATTERNS OF GRIZZLY BEAR DIET AND ACTIVITY IN WEST-CENTRAL ALBERTA , 2006 .

[7]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Habitat selection by an Alpine ungulate: the significance of forage characteristics varies with scale and season , 2009 .

[8]  Edward M. Barnes,et al.  Method for Using Images from a Color Digital Camera to Estimate Flower Number , 2000 .

[9]  Robert Pless,et al.  The global network of outdoor webcams: properties and applications , 2009, GIS.

[10]  Aaron Moody,et al.  Photosynthetic activity of US biomes: responses to the spatial variability and seasonality of precipitation and temperature , 2004 .

[11]  J. Bakker,et al.  Surfing on a green wave - how plant growth drives spring migration in the Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis , 2006 .

[12]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Structural complexity in digital images as an ecological indicator for monitoring forest dynamics across scale, space and time , 2009 .

[13]  J. Abatzoglou,et al.  Tracking the rhythm of the seasons in the face of global change: phenological research in the 21st century. , 2009 .

[14]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing satellite‐derived start‐of‐season measures in the conterminous USA , 2002 .

[15]  Jesslyn F. Brown,et al.  Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery , 1994 .

[16]  D. Mattson,et al.  Coefficients of Productivity for Yellowstone's Grizzly Bear Habitat , 2004 .

[17]  D. Hamer,et al.  Grizzly Bear Food and Habitat in the Front Ranges of Banff National Park, Alberta , 1987 .

[18]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Development and testing of phenologically driven grizzly bear habitat models , 2003 .

[19]  D. Hollinger,et al.  Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest , 2007, Oecologia.

[20]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  A generalized, bioclimatic index to predict foliar phenology in response to climate , 2004 .

[21]  Steeve D. Côté,et al.  Spring Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) predicts annual variation in timing of peak faecal crude protein in mountain ungulates , 2009 .

[22]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Public Internet‐connected cameras used as a cross‐continental ground‐based plant phenology monitoring system , 2010 .

[23]  Andrew D Richardson,et al.  Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  M. Boyce,et al.  Estimation of green herbaceous phytomass from Landsat MSS data in Yellowstone National Park. , 1993 .

[25]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  A global prognostic scheme of leaf onset using satellite data , 2000 .

[26]  Larry C. Purcell,et al.  Soybean Canopy Coverage and Light Interception Measurements Using Digital Imagery , 2000 .

[27]  S. Running,et al.  The impact of growing-season length variability on carbon assimilation and evapotranspiration over 88 years in the eastern US deciduous forest , 1999, International journal of biometeorology.

[28]  Reiko Ide,et al.  Use of digital cameras for phenological observations , 2010, Ecol. Informatics.

[29]  J. Mustard,et al.  Green leaf phenology at Landsat resolution: Scaling from the field to the satellite , 2006 .

[30]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  A MULTI-SCALE TEST OF THE FORAGE MATURATION HYPOTHESIS IN A PARTIALLY MIGRATORY UNGULATE POPULATION , 2008 .

[31]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Using digital time-lapse cameras to monitor species-specific understorey and overstorey phenology in support of wildlife habitat assessment , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[32]  Hella Ellen Ahrends,et al.  Quantitative phenological observations of a mixed beech forest in northern Switzerland with digital photography , 2008 .

[33]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  MODIS enhanced vegetation index predicts tree species richness across forested ecoregions in the contiguous U.S.A , 2006 .

[34]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Increased activity of northern vegetation inferred from atmospheric CO2 measurements , 1996, Nature.

[35]  A. Strahler,et al.  Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS , 2003 .

[36]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Grizzly bears and forestry I: Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta, Canada , 2004 .

[37]  J. Schaber,et al.  Responses of spring phenology to climate change , 2004 .

[38]  Michael Hamilton,et al.  Use of a Networked Digital Camera to Estimate Net CO2 Uptake of a Desiccation‐Tolerant Moss , 2006, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[39]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Measures of structural complexity in digital images for monitoring the ecological signature of an old-growth forest ecosystem , 2008 .

[40]  G. Meyer,et al.  Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions , 1994 .