Behavioral Differences in the Upper and Lower Visual Hemifields in Shape and Motion Perception

Perceptual accuracy is known to be influenced by stimuli location within the visual field. In particular, it seems to be enhanced in the lower visual hemifield (VH) for motion and space processing, and in the upper VH for object and face processing. The origins of such asymmetries are attributed to attentional biases across the visual field, and in the functional organization of the visual system. In this article, we tested content-dependent perceptual asymmetries in different regions of the visual field. Twenty-five healthy volunteers participated in this study. They performed three visual tests involving perception of shapes, orientation and motion, in the four quadrants of the visual field. The results of the visual tests showed that perceptual accuracy was better in the lower than in the upper visual field for motion perception, and better in the upper than in the lower visual field for shape perception. Orientation perception did not show any vertical bias. No difference was found when comparing right and left VHs. The functional organization of the visual system seems to indicate that the dorsal and the ventral visual streams, responsible for motion and shape perception, respectively, show a bias for the lower and upper VHs, respectively. Such a bias depends on the content of the visual information.

[1]  Tobias Nef,et al.  Higher visual functions in the upper and lower visual fields: A pilot study in healthy subjects , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[2]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  How parallel are the primate visual pathways? , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Sabrina Pitzalis,et al.  The functional role of the medial motion area V6 , 2013, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[5]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Visual inertia in apparent motion , 1987, Vision Research.

[6]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: Visual and attentional factors , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  T. Nef,et al.  A new method to measure higher visual functions in an immersive environment , 2014, Biomedical engineering online.

[8]  Albert O Edwards,et al.  Shape discrimination in age-related macular degeneration. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Jakob T. Valvoda,et al.  Low arousal modulates visuospatial attention in three-dimensional virtual space , 2008, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[10]  Jacqueline S. Rutkowski,et al.  Normal readers have an upper visual field advantage in change detection , 2002, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[11]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[12]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[13]  Karen R Dobkins,et al.  Attentional weighting: a possible account of visual field asymmetries in visual search? , 2004, Spatial vision.

[14]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Matthew Finkbeiner,et al.  The upper-hemifield advantage for masked face processing: Not just an attentional bias , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[16]  K. Willmes,et al.  The effect of low arousal on visuo-spatial attention , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  U. Eysel,et al.  Plasticity Beyond V1: Reinforcement of Motion Perception upon Binocular Central Retinal Lesions in Adulthood , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  T. Nef,et al.  Cathodal HD-tDCS on the right V5 improves motion perception in humans , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[19]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Visual responses of inferior temporal neurons in awake rhesus monkey. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Maryam Vaziri Pashkam,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in the Perception of Face and Form Attributes , 2010, Current Biology.

[21]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[22]  Bruno Fimm,et al.  A test battery for attentional performance , 2002 .

[23]  J. Douglas Crawford,et al.  The role of areas MT+/V5 and SPOC in spatial and temporal control of manual interception: an rTMS study , 2013, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[24]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  The influence of the retinal inhomogeneity on the perception of spatial patterns , 1972, Kybernetik.

[25]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The relative weight of shape and non-rigid motion cues in object perception: a model of the parameters underlying dynamic object discrimination. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[26]  M. Goodale,et al.  Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Vertical orienting control: evidence for attentional bias and "neglect" in the intact brain. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Motion perception , 1998 .

[29]  Éva M. Bankó,et al.  Dissociating the Effect of Noise on Sensory Processing and Overall Decision Difficulty , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  How position dependent is visual object recognition? , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  B. de Gelder,et al.  Neural correlates of body and face perception following bilateral destruction of the primary visual cortices , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[32]  R. Vogels,et al.  Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[33]  Fred H. Previc,et al.  Target-tilt and vertical-hemifield asymmetries in free-scan search for 3-D targets , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Johannes Schultz,et al.  A dynamic object-processing network: metric shape discrimination of dynamic objects by activation of occipitotemporal, parietal, and frontal cortices. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  F. Felisberti,et al.  Spatial location in brief, free-viewing face encoding modulates contextual face recognition , 2013, i-Perception.

[38]  David D. Cox,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.8 Untangling invariant object recognition , 2022 .

[39]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Perception of biological motion in visual agnosia , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[40]  Elena Amenedo,et al.  Vertical asymmetries in pre-attentive detection of changes in motion direction. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[41]  Michael W. Levine,et al.  The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields , 2005, Vision Research.

[42]  D. Ts'o,et al.  Specificity of V1–V2 orientation networks in the primate visual cortex , 2015, Cortex.

[43]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[44]  I. Biederman,et al.  High level object recognition without an anterior inferior temporal lobe , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  P. Wurtz,et al.  Linking physiology with behaviour: Functional specialisation of the visual field is reflected in gaze patterns during visual search , 2009, Vision Research.

[46]  R. Saunders,et al.  Unilateral deficits in visual perception and learning after unilateral inferotemporal cortex lesions in macaques. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  George J. Andersen,et al.  Detection of 3D curved trajectories: the role of binocular disparity , 2013, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[49]  Eyal Seidemann,et al.  Uniform spatial spread of population activity in primate parafoveal V1. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Tristan A. Chaplin,et al.  Representation of the visual field in the primary visual area of the marmoset monkey: Magnification factors, point‐image size, and proportionality to retinal ganglion cell density , 2013, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[51]  M. Rand,et al.  Eye–hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation: effects of hemispace and joint coordination , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Perception of movement and shape in Alzheimer's disease. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.