Comparison of methods for individualized astronaut organ dosimetry: Morphometry-based phantom library versus body contour autoscaling of a reference phantom.

One of the hazards faced by space crew members in low-Earth orbit or in deep space is exposure to ionizing radiation. It has been shown previously that while differences in organ-specific and whole-body risk estimates due to body size variations are small for highly-penetrating galactic cosmic rays, large differences in these quantities can result from exposure to shorter-range trapped proton or solar particle event radiations. For this reason, it is desirable to use morphometrically accurate computational phantoms representing each astronaut for a risk analysis, especially in the case of a solar particle event. An algorithm was developed to automatically sculpt and scale the UF adult male and adult female hybrid reference phantom to the individual outer body contour of a given astronaut. This process begins with the creation of a laser-measured polygon mesh model of the astronaut's body contour. Using the auto-scaling program and selecting several anatomical landmarks, the UF adult male or female phantom is adjusted to match the laser-measured outer body contour of the astronaut. A dosimetry comparison study was conducted to compare the organ dose accuracy of both the autoscaled phantom and that based upon a height-weight matched phantom from the UF/NCI Computational Phantom Library. Monte Carlo methods were used to simulate the environment of the August 1972 and February 1956 solar particle events. Using a series of individual-specific voxel phantoms as a local benchmark standard, autoscaled phantom organ dose estimates were shown to provide a 1% and 10% improvement in organ dose accuracy for a population of females and males, respectively, as compared to organ doses derived from height-weight matched phantoms from the UF/NCI Computational Phantom Library. In addition, this slight improvement in organ dose accuracy from the autoscaled phantoms is accompanied by reduced computer storage requirements and a more rapid method for individualized phantom generation when compared to the UF/NCI Computational Phantom Library.

[1]  John W. Norbury,et al.  Transport Methods and Inter-actions for Space Radiations , 2003 .

[2]  Perry B. Johnson,et al.  The impact of anthropometric patient-phantom matching on organ dose: a hybrid phantom study for fluoroscopy guided interventions. , 2011, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Valentin.  Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values , 2002, Annals of the ICRP.

[4]  Hiroshi Nakashima,et al.  Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System, PHITS, version 2.52 , 2013 .

[5]  M. P. Billings,et al.  The Computerized Anatomical Man (CAM) model , 1973 .

[6]  Wesley E. Bolch,et al.  Hybrid Patient-Dependent Phantoms Covering Statistical Distributions of Body Morphometry in the U.S. Adult and Pediatric Population , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Tony C. Slaba,et al.  Faster and more accurate transport procedures for HZETRN , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  The UF/NCI family of hybrid computational phantoms representing the current US population of male and female children, adolescents, and adults—application to CT dosimetry , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Daniel Lodwick,et al.  The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  M. J. Berger.  ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer programs for calculating stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions , 1992 .

[11]  W. Bolch,et al.  Dosimetric impacts of microgravity: an analysis of 5th, 50th and 95th percentile male and female astronauts , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  W. T. Lawrence,et al.  HZETRN: Description of a Free-Space Ion and Nucleon Transport and Shielding Computer Program , 1995 .

[13]  W. Bolch,et al.  The effect of anatomical modeling on space radiation dose estimates: a comparison of doses for NASA phantoms and the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentile male and female astronauts , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.