Smart Sticky Widgets: Pseudo-haptic Enhancements for Multi-Monitor Displays

Multi-monitor systems are becoming increasingly popular as a way for users to expand their display surface to facilitate multitasking. However, users may have difficulty accessing user interface elements on the borders of the displays, accidentally crossing over to neighbouring displays. We present a smart pseudo-haptic technique to enhance boundary widgets in multi-monitor systems. Our technique was compared to current desktop behaviour as well as to two other pseudo-haptic approaches. All three techniques significantly reduced crossover errors; however, our smart sticky technique also significantly reduced the time to acquire targets on the secondary monitor over the other sticky techniques and was strongly preferred by users.

[1]  Krishna Bharat,et al.  Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons , 1997, CHI.

[2]  Renaud Blanch,et al.  Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation , 2004, CHI.

[3]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Patrick Baudisch,et al.  Snap-and-go: helping users align objects without the modality of traditional snapping , 2005, CHI.

[5]  Patrick Baudisch,et al.  Mouse ether: accelerating the acquisition of targets across multi-monitor displays , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[6]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  Sticky widgets: pseudo-haptic widget enhancements for multi-monitor displays , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Pseudo-haptic feedback: can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No.00CB37048).

[8]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Improving the Acquisition of Small Targets , 2004 .

[9]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  Quantitative analysis of scrolling techniques , 2002, CHI.

[10]  David Ahlstr Modeling and Improving Selection in Cascading Pull›Down Menus Using Fitts' Law, the Steering Law and Force Fields , 2005 .

[11]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard , 1999, CHI '99.

[12]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Can Isometric Input Devices Simulate Force Feedback , 2000 .

[13]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users , 2004, AVI.

[14]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use , 2001, CHI.

[15]  Laurent Étienne,et al.  Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: the perception of pseudo-haptic textures , 2004, CHI.

[16]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Wideband displays: mitigating multiple monitor seams , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[17]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  "Beating" Fitts' law: virtual enhancements for pointing facilitation , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays , 2003, INTERACT.

[19]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  The large-display user experience , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.