Analysis of relationships among vegetation condition indices and multiple-time scale SPI of grassland in growing season

Drought is one of the important environmental disasters in various parts of the world which has an impact on many aspects of society, and it is the most complex but least understood of all natural hazards. The present study is an attempt to improve our understanding of characteristics and relationships between vegetation condition and meteorological factors that cause drought. Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) and phenology metric called Percent of Average Seasonal Greenness (PASG) which are based on 10 years (1999–2008) time-series SPOT VGT-S NDVI were used to monitor grass growing condition. Multiple-time scale (1-month, 2-month, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month) Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) was used to detect drought. By analyzing the changes of correlation coefficients among VCI, PASG and SPIs, the 3-month SPI was found to have the best correlation with VCI and PASG, but the relationship varies significantly during different periods of the grass growing season. Correlation coefficients between VCI, PASG vs. SPIs reached 0.695 and 0.725 respectively at the last ten days of September and the first ten days of October. Compared with PASG, VCI shows more sensitive to precipitation on the whole, but the results of grass condition monitoring caused by drought is more stable using PASG than VCI. Both of them have a certain complementary for each other.

[1]  L. Ji,et al.  Assessing vegetation response to drought in the northern Great Plains using vegetation and drought indices , 2003 .

[2]  A. Huete,et al.  A review of vegetation indices , 1995 .

[3]  T. McKee,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF DROUGHT FREQUENCY AND DURATION TO TIME SCALES , 1993 .

[4]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[5]  Yasushi Yamaguchi,et al.  Vegetation, water and thermal stress index for study of drought in Nepal and central northeastern India , 2010 .

[6]  F. Kogan Remote sensing of weather impacts on vegetation in non-homogeneous areas , 1990 .

[7]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[8]  K. Price,et al.  Temporal responses of NDVI to precipitation and temperature in the central Great Plains, USA , 2003 .

[9]  Donald A. Wilhite,et al.  Drought : a global assessment , 2000 .

[10]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[11]  C. Tucker,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of primary production , 1986 .

[12]  Thian Yew Gan,et al.  Drought indices and their application to East Africa , 2003 .

[13]  D. Wilhite,et al.  Monitoring the 1996 Drought Using the Standardized Precipitation Index , 1999 .

[14]  N. Guttman ACCEPTING THE STANDARDIZED PRECIPITATION INDEX: A CALCULATION ALGORITHM 1 , 1999 .

[15]  Jin Chen,et al.  A simple method for reconstructing a high-quality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky-Golay filter , 2004 .

[16]  F. Kogan Application of vegetation index and brightness temperature for drought detection , 1995 .

[17]  Limin Yang,et al.  An analysis of relationships among climate forcing and time-integrated NDVI of grasslands over the U.S. northern and central Great Plains , 1998 .

[18]  T. Tadesse,et al.  The Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI): A New Integrated Approach for Monitoring Drought Stress in Vegetation , 2008 .

[19]  A. Strahler,et al.  Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS , 2003 .