A Four-Participant Group Facilitation Framework for Conversational Robots

In this paper, we propose a framework for conversational robots that facilitates fourparticipant groups. In three-participant conversations, the minimum unit for multiparty conversations, social imbalance, in which a participant is left behind in the current conversation, sometimes occurs. In such scenarios, a conversational robot has the potential to facilitate situations as the fourth participant. Consequently, we present model procedures for obtaining conversational initiatives in incremental steps to engage such four-participant conversations. During the procedures, a facilitator must be aware of both the presence of dominant participants leading the current conversation and the status of any participant that is left behind. We model and optimize these situations and procedures as a partially observable Markov decision process. The results of experiments conducted to evaluate the proposed procedures show evidence of their acceptability and feeling of groupness.

[1]  Steve J. Young,et al.  Partially observable Markov decision processes for spoken dialog systems , 2007, Comput. Speech Lang..

[2]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Models for Multiparty Engagement in Open-World Dialog , 2009, SIGDIAL Conference.

[3]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Point-Based POMDP Algorithms: Improved Analysis and Implementation , 2005, UAI.

[4]  K. D. Benne,et al.  Functional Roles of Group Members , 2010 .

[5]  Tetsunori Kobayashi,et al.  MONEA: message-oriented networked-robot architecture , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[6]  Tetsunori Kobayashi,et al.  Conversation Robot Participating in Group Conversation , 2003 .

[7]  Ryuichiro Higashinaka,et al.  Effects of Conversational Agents on Human Communication in Thought-Evoking Multi-Party Dialogues , 2009, SIGDIAL Conference.

[8]  Tetsunori Kobayashi,et al.  SCHEMA: multi-party interaction-oriented humanoid robot , 2009, SIGGRAPH ASIA '09.

[9]  Claire Cardie,et al.  Identifying Expressions of Opinion in Context , 2007, IJCAI.

[10]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Where to look: a study of human-robot engagement , 2004, IUI '04.

[11]  Rohit Kumar,et al.  Conversational Strategies that Support Idea Generation Productivity in Groups , 2011, CSCL.

[12]  Kentaro Inui,et al.  Extracting Subjective and Objective Evaluative Expressions from the Web , 2008, 2008 Second International Symposium on Universal Communication.

[13]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[14]  Wesley H. Osterberg Interaction process analysis. , 1951 .

[15]  Tetsunori Kobayashi,et al.  Designing communication activation system in group communication , 2008, Humanoids 2008 - 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[16]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[17]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[18]  Maxine Eskénazi,et al.  A Finite-State Turn-Taking Model for Spoken Dialog Systems , 2009, NAACL.

[19]  Rohit Kumar,et al.  Conversational Tutors with Rich Interactive Behaviors that support Collaborative Learning , 2010 .

[20]  Tetsunori Kobayashi,et al.  Psychological evaluation of a group communication activation robot in a party game , 2010, INTERSPEECH.

[21]  Crystal Chao,et al.  Timing in multimodal turn-taking interactions , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[22]  Yuji Matsumoto,et al.  Opinion mining from web documents: extraction and structurization (論文特集:データマイニングと統計数理) , 2007 .